StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Javascript Testing Framework
  5. ESLint vs Jest

ESLint vs Jest

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jest
Jest
Stacks15.2K
Followers4.1K
Votes175
ESLint
ESLint
Stacks38.6K
Followers14.0K
Votes28
GitHub Stars26.6K
Forks4.8K

ESLint vs Jest: What are the differences?

Key Differences between ESLint and Jest

ESLint and Jest are both popular tools used in web development. While they serve different purposes, they have key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Purpose: ESLint is a static code analysis tool used to identify and report patterns and problems in JavaScript code. It helps enforce coding standards and best practices. On the other hand, Jest is a testing framework primarily used for testing JavaScript code. It provides a testing environment and tools for writing unit tests, integration tests, and snapshots.

  2. Configuration: ESLint requires a configuration file (.eslintrc) to set rules, environments, and extensions for linting. It offers a wide range of configurable options to customize the linting process. In contrast, Jest requires a configuration file (jest.config.js) to define its behavior and settings for running tests. It provides options to configure test environments, test patterns, and reporter output.

  3. Usage: ESLint can be integrated into various development environments, editors, and build systems. It helps developers catch syntax errors, logical errors, and maintain consistent code style. It can be run as part of a build process or in an integrated development environment (IDE). Jest, on the other hand, is primarily used in the command line interface (CLI) to run tests. It provides a rich set of matchers, assertions, and utilities for testing JavaScript code.

  4. Test Coverage: Jest includes built-in functionality for generating code coverage reports. It can track the lines of code executed during the tests and provide insights into the code coverage percentage. ESLint, however, does not have built-in support for code coverage analysis. Developers would need to use separate tools or plugins to analyze test coverage when using ESLint.

  5. Test Runners: Jest comes with its own test runner, which allows parallel and isolated execution of test cases. It has built-in features like test filtering, test watch mode, and test caching for faster execution. ESLint, on the other hand, is not a test runner and does not have the ability to execute tests. It focuses on analyzing code and providing feedback on potential issues.

  6. Integration with Other Tools: Both ESLint and Jest can be integrated with various other tools and libraries. ESLint has integrations with editors like Visual Studio Code and build systems like Webpack. It can also be extended with plugins to support additional rules and custom configurations. Jest, on the other hand, can be integrated with tools like Babel for transpiling code, Enzyme for testing React components, and Puppeteer for testing web applications.

In summary, ESLint is a code analysis tool used to enforce coding standards and catch potential issues in JavaScript code, while Jest is a testing framework used for writing and running tests. They differ in their purpose, configuration, usage, test coverage, test runners, and integration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jest, ESLint

Dane
Dane

Feb 7, 2020

Needs adviceonCypressCypressJestJest

As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

836k views836k
Comments
Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jest
Jest
ESLint
ESLint

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Familiar Approach: Built on top of the Jasmine test framework, using familiar expect(value).toBe(other) assertions;Mock by Default: Automatically mocks CommonJS modules returned by require(), making most existing code testable;Short Feedback Loop: DOM APIs are mocked and tests run in parallel via a small node.js command line utility
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
26.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.8K
Stacks
15.2K
Stacks
38.6K
Followers
4.1K
Followers
14.0K
Votes
175
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 36
    Open source
  • 32
    Mock by default makes testing much simpler
  • 23
    Testing React Native Apps
  • 20
    Parallel test running
  • 16
    Fast
Cons
  • 4
    Documentation
  • 4
    Ambiguous configuration
  • 3
    Difficult
  • 2
    Bugged
  • 2
    Difficult to run single test/describe/file
Pros
  • 8
    Consistent javascript - opinions don't matter anymore
  • 6
    Free
  • 6
    IDE Integration
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 2
    Broad ecosystem of support & users
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Jest, ESLint?

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

CodeceptJS

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana