StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. ESLint vs Stylelint

ESLint vs Stylelint

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ESLint
ESLint
Stacks38.6K
Followers14.0K
Votes28
GitHub Stars26.6K
Forks4.8K
Stylelint
Stylelint
Stacks1.6K
Followers100
Votes6
GitHub Stars11.4K
Forks986

ESLint vs Stylelint: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In modern web development, it is essential to maintain code quality and consistency. Two widely used tools for linting and enforcing coding style are ESLint and Stylelint. While both tools serve similar purposes, there are key differences between them.

  1. Architecture: ESLint is designed to lint and enforce coding style for JavaScript, while Stylelint is specifically built for linting CSS and its pre-processors. This means that ESLint focuses on JavaScript-specific rules and conventions, while Stylelint focuses on CSS-specific rules and conventions.

  2. Configuration: ESLint uses a single configuration file, typically named .eslintrc, which allows developers to define rules and configurations for their entire JavaScript project. On the other hand, Stylelint allows configuration through multiple files, such as .stylelintrc or through package.json. This provides flexibility to configure specific rules for different CSS files or modules.

  3. Supported Rules: ESLint provides a wide range of rules that cover various aspects of JavaScript coding style, including best practices, syntax errors, and possible bugs. Stylelint, on the other hand, focuses on CSS-specific rules, such as indentation, selector specificity, naming conventions, and property orders.

  4. Integration with Build Tools: ESLint integrates seamlessly with popular build tools and editors, such as webpack, Babel, and Visual Studio Code. This enables developers to receive real-time feedback and linting suggestions while writing code. Stylelint also offers similar integrations with popular editors and build tools, enhancing the CSS linting experience.

  5. Plugin Ecosystem: ESLint has a vast plugin ecosystem, allowing developers to extend its functionalities and enforce custom rules specific to their projects. This makes ESLint highly customizable and adaptable. Stylelint also has a plugin ecosystem, providing additional rules and integrations, albeit more focused on CSS and related technologies.

  6. Community and Adoption: ESLint has gained widespread adoption across the JavaScript community, making it the de facto linter for JavaScript projects. It has a large and active community, ensuring regular updates, bug fixes, and improvements. Stylelint, although not as widely adopted as ESLint, has also gained popularity within the CSS community, with an increasing number of developers using it for linting CSS code.

In summary, ESLint and Stylelint differ in their focus on JavaScript and CSS, respectively. ESLint has more extensive JavaScript-related rules, while Stylelint has a narrower focus on CSS-specific rules. Both tools offer flexible configuration options, integrations with popular build tools, and active plugin ecosystems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on ESLint, Stylelint

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Budi
Budi

Programmer

Aug 19, 2020

Review

I think you scan skip MongoDB for now and focussing on creating web component with Reactjs or Vue, I would also recommend to use TypeScript for type hinting support.

For styling, learn CSS first then upgrade to SASS/SCSS or LESS (pick one as mostly same concept) to make CSS more maintainable.

Also to improve your skill on both sectors, install linters if available. For TypeScipt, there are TSLint and for styling, i think there are Stylint. Linter will help you adapt to make a clean code and understand how other peoples usually styled their code.

41.6k views41.6k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

ESLint
ESLint
Stylelint
Stylelint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

A mighty, modern CSS linter that helps you enforce consistent conventions and avoid errors in your stylesheets.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
26.6K
GitHub Stars
11.4K
GitHub Forks
4.8K
GitHub Forks
986
Stacks
38.6K
Stacks
1.6K
Followers
14.0K
Followers
100
Votes
28
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Consistent javascript - opinions don't matter anymore
  • 6
    Free
  • 6
    IDE Integration
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 2
    Broad ecosystem of support & users
Pros
  • 5
    Great way to lint your CSS or SCSS
  • 1
    Only complains about real problems
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to ESLint, Stylelint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana