StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Service Discovery
  5. Eureka vs Traefik

Eureka vs Traefik

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Eureka
Eureka
Stacks291
Followers779
Votes70
GitHub Stars12.7K
Forks3.8K
Traefik
Traefik
Stacks965
Followers1.2K
Votes93

Eureka vs Traefik: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Load Balancing: Eureka primarily focuses on server-side load balancing, where the client side is responsible for determining which instance to call based on metadata provided by the server. In contrast, Traefik provides a built-in load balancing mechanism that includes several load-balancing algorithms such as round-robin, random, and least connections.
  2. Service Discovery: Eureka is a service registry and discovery tool that allows services to register themselves and discover other services. On the other hand, Traefik is a modern reverse proxy that integrates well with orchestration platforms like Kubernetes to automatically discover services and route traffic to them.
  3. Configuration: Eureka relies on the configuration provided by the services during registration, which may lead to potential inconsistencies. Traefik uses dynamic configuration through a centralized configuration file or API, allowing for real-time adjustments without requiring service redeployment.
  4. Support for Protocols: Eureka supports communication over HTTP and integrates well with Spring Cloud services. Traefik, being a reverse proxy, supports a wider range of protocols including HTTP, TCP, gRPC, and WebSocket, making it suitable for diverse networking requirements.
  5. Resilience: Eureka's architecture is based on an eventual consistency model, which may introduce delays in propagating changes across instances. Traefik, with its distributed nature and built-in health checks, offers better resilience and faster recovery in the event of failures.
  6. Extensibility: Eureka provides limited extensibility options, primarily focusing on Java-based customizations. In contrast, Traefik offers a plugin system that allows users to extend its functionalities using languages like Golang, enabling a more diverse set of customizations and integrations.
In Summary, Eureka and Traefik differ in their approach to load balancing, service discovery, configuration, protocol support, resilience, and extensibility options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Eureka
Eureka
Traefik
Traefik

Eureka is a REST (Representational State Transfer) based service that is primarily used in the AWS cloud for locating services for the purpose of load balancing and failover of middle-tier servers.

A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.

-
Continuously updates its configuration (No restarts!); Supports multiple load balancing algorithms; Provides HTTPS to your microservices by leveraging Let's Encrypt (wildcard certificates support); Circuit breakers, retry; High Availability with cluster mode; See the magic through its clean web UI; Websocket, HTTP/2, GRPC ready; Provides metrics; Keeps access logs; Fast; Exposes a Rest API
Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
291
Stacks
965
Followers
779
Followers
1.2K
Votes
70
Votes
93
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 21
    Easy setup and integration with spring-cloud
  • 9
    Web ui
  • 8
    Health checking
  • 8
    Monitoring
  • 7
    Circuit breaker
Cons
  • 1
    Nada
Pros
  • 20
    Kubernetes integration
  • 18
    Watch service discovery updates
  • 14
    Letsencrypt support
  • 13
    Swarm integration
  • 12
    Several backends
Cons
  • 7
    Complicated setup
  • 7
    Not very performant (fast)
Integrations
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Marathon
Marathon
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
gRPC
gRPC
Let's Encrypt
Let's Encrypt
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Consul
Consul
StatsD
StatsD
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm

What are some alternatives to Eureka, Traefik?

HAProxy

HAProxy

HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.

Consul

Consul

Consul is a tool for service discovery and configuration. Consul is distributed, highly available, and extremely scalable.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

With Elastic Load Balancing, you can add and remove EC2 instances as your needs change without disrupting the overall flow of information. If one EC2 instance fails, Elastic Load Balancing automatically reroutes the traffic to the remaining running EC2 instances. If the failed EC2 instance is restored, Elastic Load Balancing restores the traffic to that instance. Elastic Load Balancing offers clients a single point of contact, and it can also serve as the first line of defense against attacks on your network. You can offload the work of encryption and decryption to Elastic Load Balancing, so your servers can focus on their main task.

Zookeeper

Zookeeper

A centralized service for maintaining configuration information, naming, providing distributed synchronization, and providing group services. All of these kinds of services are used in some form or another by distributed applications.

etcd

etcd

etcd is a distributed key value store that provides a reliable way to store data across a cluster of machines. It’s open-source and available on GitHub. etcd gracefully handles master elections during network partitions and will tolerate machine failure, including the master.

Fly

Fly

Deploy apps through our global load balancer with minimal shenanigans. All Fly-enabled applications get free SSL certificates, accept traffic through our global network of datacenters, and encrypt all traffic from visitors through to application servers.

Envoy

Envoy

Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures.

Keepalived

Keepalived

The main goal of this project is to provide simple and robust facilities for loadbalancing and high-availability to Linux system and Linux based infrastructures.

Hipache

Hipache

Hipache is a distributed proxy designed to route high volumes of http and websocket traffic to unusually large numbers of virtual hosts, in a highly dynamic topology where backends are added and removed several times per second. It is particularly well-suited for PaaS (platform-as-a-service) and other environments that are both business-critical and multi-tenant.

node-http-proxy

node-http-proxy

node-http-proxy is an HTTP programmable proxying library that supports websockets. It is suitable for implementing components such as proxies and load balancers.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana