Falco Security vs Jib: What are the differences?

# Introduction

1. **Deployment Method**: Falco Security can be deployed as an agent on every node in a Kubernetes cluster, while Jib is used to build container images without the need for a Docker daemon. 
2. **Use Cases**: Falco Security is designed specifically for runtime security and anomaly detection within containers, whereas Jib is focused on simplifying the process of building container images. 
3. **Monitoring Capabilities**: Falco Security provides real-time monitoring and detection of abnormal activities within containers, whereas Jib does not offer any monitoring features. 
4. **Resource Consumption**: Falco Security may consume more resources due to its continuous monitoring and detection capabilities, whereas Jib is lightweight and efficient in building container images. 
5. **Functionality**: Falco Security offers advanced features for detecting and preventing security breaches in real-time, while Jib is primarily focused on building container images quickly and efficiently. 
6. **Integration**: Falco Security seamlessly integrates with Kubernetes environments for enhanced security, whereas Jib can be integrated with common Java build tools like Maven and Gradle for streamlined container image building. 

In Summary, Falco Security and Jib serve different purposes in the containerization ecosystem with Falco focusing on runtime security and anomaly detection while Jib simplifies container image building processes.