Fat-Free
Fat-Free

21
21
23
Play
Play

531
274
460
Add tool

Fat-Free vs Play: What are the differences?

Developers describe Fat-Free as "PHP micro-framework designed to help you build dynamic and robust Web applications - fast". Fat-Free Framework makes it easy to build entire Web sites in a jiffy. With the same power and brevity as modern Javascript toolkits and libraries, F3 helps you write better-looking and more reliable PHP programs. On the other hand, Play is detailed as "The High Velocity Web Framework For Java and Scala". Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications.

Fat-Free and Play can be primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.

"Open source" is the top reason why over 5 developers like Fat-Free, while over 73 developers mention "Scala" as the leading cause for choosing Play.

Fat-Free and Play are both open source tools. Play with 11.2K GitHub stars and 3.77K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Fat-Free with 2.3K GitHub stars and 443 GitHub forks.

What is Fat-Free?

Fat-Free Framework makes it easy to build entire Web sites in a jiffy. With the same power and brevity as modern Javascript toolkits and libraries, F3 helps you write better-looking and more reliable PHP programs.

What is Play?

Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications.

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Fat-Free?
Why do developers choose Play?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

What are the cons of using Fat-Free?
What are the cons of using Play?
    Be the first to leave a con
    What companies use Fat-Free?
    What companies use Play?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Fat-Free?
    What tools integrate with Play?
    What are some alternatives to Fat-Free and Play?
    Node.js
    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.
    ASP.NET
    .NET is a developer platform made up of tools, programming languages, and libraries for building many different types of applications.
    Rails
    Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.
    Django
    Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.
    Laravel
    It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.
    See all alternatives
    Decisions about Fat-Free and Play
    No stack decisions found
    Interest over time
    Reviews of Fat-Free and Play
    Review ofFat-FreeFat-Free

    This compact framework provided me flexibility. I can implement my own design pattern either MVC or something else. What caught my attention the most was its built-in ORM that can accommodate SQL and NoSql database. That means I can have my MongoSql and SQL queries written by those compatible raw sql statements but still creates ORM models the same way as nosql. Consider for example: $user=new DB\SQL\Mapper($db,'users');// for sql db $user=new DB\Mongo\Mapper($db,'users'); // for mongo db then $user = $user->load('id = 1');

    Thanks to its high modularity, I can add more fat to my liking. There's also Cortex ORM f3 extension which handles join tables. Also, handles sessions, routing, and config with ease and let you organize them neatly. That's just a few of the handful features without much weight and with fast performance. One drawback is smaller community, but didn't disappoint me.

    How developers use Fat-Free and Play
    Avatar of datapile
    datapile uses PlayPlay

    Play is a central framework/component/library (not sure what to call things these days) in Scala. We <3 Scala, and therefore we <3 Play.

    Play is on of several frameworks we are prototyping and vetting for various public-facing websites, and may ultimately be the framework behind the main datapile.io website.

    Avatar of Stanislaus Madueke
    Stanislaus Madueke uses PlayPlay

    I used Play to build a configuration UI for the service, which let you create and manage the menus (a hierarchical tree of options and actions).

    Avatar of Ascendify
    Ascendify uses PlayPlay

    Moving some micro services to Play Framework with Scala

    Avatar of papaver
    papaver uses PlayPlay

    used play at talenthouse. uber powerful backend.

    Avatar of Jovi Kao
    Jovi Kao uses PlayPlay

    API server framework

    How much does Fat-Free cost?
    How much does Play cost?
    Pricing unavailable
    Pricing unavailable
    News about Fat-Free
    More news
    News about Play
    More news