Fedora vs OpenBSD

Overview

OpenBSD

Stacks46

Followers55

Votes0

Fedora

Stacks623

Followers515

Votes97

Fedora vs OpenBSD: What are the differences?

User Base: Fedora is designed for general desktop use and is more user-friendly with frequent updates and newer software packages, making it a popular choice for individual users and developers. On the other hand, OpenBSD focuses on security and stability, attracting users who prioritize these aspects over having the latest features.
Security Focus: OpenBSD has a reputation for its stringent security measures, with the OpenBSD team focusing heavily on code auditing, exploit mitigation, and providing secure default configurations. Fedora, while having security as a priority, may not offer the same level of security hardening out of the box as OpenBSD does.
Package Management: Fedora uses DNF (Dandified Yum) as its package manager, which enables users to install, update, and remove packages efficiently. In contrast, OpenBSD employs the pkg_add tool for package management and emphasizes a more minimalistic approach to software installation and maintenance.
Philosophy: Fedora follows the principles of the Fedora Project, which values free and open-source software while also striving to provide cutting-edge technologies to users. OpenBSD, on the other hand, adheres to the OpenBSD philosophy, focusing on code correctness, simplicity, and security above all else.
Community Support: Fedora boasts a larger and more vibrant community compared to OpenBSD, offering extensive documentation, forums, and user groups for support. OpenBSD, while having a dedicated user base, may not have the same level of community engagement or resources available to users seeking help or guidance.
System Performance: OpenBSD is known for its efficiency and optimized codebase, making it a lightweight and resource-friendly operating system suitable for older hardware or systems with limited resources. Fedora, being more feature-rich and visually appealing, may require more system resources to run smoothly and provide a seamless user experience.

In Summary, Fedora and OpenBSD differ in their user base, security focus, package management, philosophy, community support, and system performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenBSD	Fedora
It is a free and secure UNIX-like operating system that emphasizes portability, standardization, correctness, proactive security & integrated cryptography.	Fedora is a Linux-based operating system that provides users with access to the latest free and open source software, in a stable, secure and easy to manage form. Fedora is the largest of many free software creations of the Fedora Project. Because of its predominance, the word "Fedora" is often used interchangeably to mean both the Fedora Project and the Fedora operating system.
API and build changes;Kernel randomization;Memory protection;Cryptography and randomization;X11	-
Statistics
Stacks 46	Stacks 623
Followers 55	Followers 515
Votes 0	Votes 97
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 23 Great for developers 10 Good release schedule 10 Great integration with system tools 10 Represents the future of rhel/centos 8 Reliable Cons 3 Bugs get fixed slowly from kernel side 2 Boring 2 Systemd 2 Much less support from Wiki 1 Learning curve for new users
Integrations
HTML5 C++	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to OpenBSD, Fedora?

Ubuntu

Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning ‘humanity to others’. It also means ‘I am what I am because of who we all are’. The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers.

Debian

Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software.

Arch Linux

A lightweight and flexible Linux distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.

Linux Mint

The purpose of Linux Mint is to produce a modern, elegant and comfortable operating system which is both powerful and easy to use.

CentOS

The CentOS Project is a community-driven free software effort focused on delivering a robust open source ecosystem. For users, we offer a consistent manageable platform that suits a wide variety of deployments. For open source communities, we offer a solid, predictable base to build upon, along with extensive resources to build, test, release, and maintain their code.

Linux

A clone of the operating system Unix, written from scratch by Linus Torvalds with assistance from a loosely-knit team of hackers across the Net. It aims towards POSIX and Single UNIX Specification compliance.

CoreOS

It is designed for security, consistency, and reliability. Instead of installing packages via yum or apt, it uses Linux containers to manage your services at a higher level of abstraction. A single service's code and all dependencies are packaged within a container that can be run on one or many machines.

Gentoo Linux

It is a free operating system based on either Linux or FreeBSD that can be automatically optimized and customized for just about any application or need.

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux is a security-oriented, lightweight Linux distribution based on musl libc and busybox.

Manjaro

It is an accessible, friendly, open-source Linux distribution and community. Based on Arch Linux, it provides all the benefits of cutting-edge software combined with a focus on getting started quickly, automated tools to require less manual intervention, and help readily available when needed.

Related Comparisons

Fedora vs OpenBSD: What are the differences?

User Base: Fedora is designed for general desktop use and is more user-friendly with frequent updates and newer software packages, making it a popular choice for individual users and developers. On the other hand, OpenBSD focuses on security and stability, attracting users who prioritize these aspects over having the latest features.
Security Focus: OpenBSD has a reputation for its stringent security measures, with the OpenBSD team focusing heavily on code auditing, exploit mitigation, and providing secure default configurations. Fedora, while having security as a priority, may not offer the same level of security hardening out of the box as OpenBSD does.
Package Management: Fedora uses DNF (Dandified Yum) as its package manager, which enables users to install, update, and remove packages efficiently. In contrast, OpenBSD employs the pkg_add tool for package management and emphasizes a more minimalistic approach to software installation and maintenance.
Philosophy: Fedora follows the principles of the Fedora Project, which values free and open-source software while also striving to provide cutting-edge technologies to users. OpenBSD, on the other hand, adheres to the OpenBSD philosophy, focusing on code correctness, simplicity, and security above all else.
Community Support: Fedora boasts a larger and more vibrant community compared to OpenBSD, offering extensive documentation, forums, and user groups for support. OpenBSD, while having a dedicated user base, may not have the same level of community engagement or resources available to users seeking help or guidance.
System Performance: OpenBSD is known for its efficiency and optimized codebase, making it a lightweight and resource-friendly operating system suitable for older hardware or systems with limited resources. Fedora, being more feature-rich and visually appealing, may require more system resources to run smoothly and provide a seamless user experience.

In Summary, Fedora and OpenBSD differ in their user base, security focus, package management, philosophy, community support, and system performance.

Fedora vs OpenBSD

Overview