Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Finagle

69
99
+ 1
10
RxJS

4.3K
623
+ 1
21
Add tool

Finagle vs RxJS: What are the differences?

Developers describe Finagle as "An extensible RPC system for the JVM". Finagle is an extensible RPC system for the JVM, used to construct high-concurrency servers. Finagle implements uniform client and server APIs for several protocols, and is designed for high performance and concurrency. On the other hand, RxJS is detailed as "The Reactive Extensions for JavaScript". RxJS is a library for reactive programming using Observables, to make it easier to compose asynchronous or callback-based code. This project is a rewrite of Reactive-Extensions/RxJS with better performance, better modularity, better debuggable call stacks, while staying mostly backwards compatible, with some breaking changes that reduce the API surface.

Finagle and RxJS belong to "Concurrency Frameworks" category of the tech stack.

Finagle and RxJS are both open source tools. It seems that RxJS with 19.7K GitHub stars and 2.26K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Finagle with 7.16K GitHub stars and 1.27K GitHub forks.

According to the StackShare community, RxJS has a broader approval, being mentioned in 57 company stacks & 44 developers stacks; compared to Finagle, which is listed in 11 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Finagle
Pros of RxJS
  • 4
    Fast
  • 3
    HTTP-friendly
  • 3
    Open Source
  • 6
    Easier async data chaining and combining
  • 3
    Steep learning curve, but offers predictable operations
  • 2
    Observable subjects
  • 2
    Ability to build your own stream
  • 2
    Works great with any state management implementation
  • 2
    Easier testing
  • 1
    Lot of build-in operators
  • 1
    Simplifies state management
  • 1
    Great for push based architecture
  • 1
    Documentation

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Finagle
Cons of RxJS
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 3
      Steep learning curve

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Finagle?

    Finagle is an extensible RPC system for the JVM, used to construct high-concurrency servers. Finagle implements uniform client and server APIs for several protocols, and is designed for high performance and concurrency.

    What is RxJS?

    RxJS is a library for reactive programming using Observables, to make it easier to compose asynchronous or callback-based code. This project is a rewrite of Reactive-Extensions/RxJS with better performance, better modularity, better debuggable call stacks, while staying mostly backwards compatible, with some breaking changes that reduce the API surface.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Finagle?
    What companies use RxJS?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Finagle or RxJS.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Finagle?
    What tools integrate with RxJS?
      No integrations found
      What are some alternatives to Finagle and RxJS?
      Finatra
      At Twitter, Finagle provides the building blocks for most of the code written on the JVM. It has long-served as Twitter's extensible, protocol-agnostic, highly-scalable RPC framework.
      gRPC
      gRPC is a modern open source high performance RPC framework that can run in any environment. It can efficiently connect services in and across data centers with pluggable support for load balancing, tracing, health checking...
      Akka
      Akka is a toolkit and runtime for building highly concurrent, distributed, and resilient message-driven applications on the JVM.
      Spring Boot
      Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.
      Play
      Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications.
      See all alternatives