Scrutinizer vs FindBugs | What are the differences? | StackShare

FindBugs vs Scrutinizer

Overview

Scrutinizer

Stacks94

Followers64

Votes20

FindBugs

Stacks625

Followers100

Votes0

FindBugs vs Scrutinizer: What are the differences?

Developers describe FindBugs as "An open-source static code analyser". It detects possible bugs in Java programs. Potential errors are classified in four ranks: scariest, scary, troubling and of concern. This is a hint to the developer about their possible impact or severity. On the other hand, Scrutinizer is detailed as "Continuous inspection platform - improve code quality and find bugs before they hit production". Scrutinizer is a continuous inspection platform helping you to create better software.

FindBugs and Scrutinizer belong to "Code Review" category of the tech stack.

🔥 Trending in Code Review on StackShare

fossabot Code Review

fossabot

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

Detailed Comparison

Scrutinizer	FindBugs
Scrutinizer is a continuous inspection platform helping you to create better software.	It detects possible bugs in Java programs. Potential errors are classified in four ranks: scariest, scary, troubling and of concern. This is a hint to the developer about their possible impact or severity.
Continuously measure and track your code quality;Project quality broken down;Know your problem areas;Works fine with legacy code bases	static analysis of the Java bytecode; early feedback about potential errors in the code
Statistics
Stacks 94	Stacks 625
Followers 64	Followers 100
Votes 20	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 7 Github integration / sync 4 Bitbucket integration / sync 2 Gitlab integration / sync 2 Private Git repo sync 1 Python inspection Cons 1 Pricing	No community feedback yet
Integrations
GitHub Bitbucket	Jenkins Java NetBeans IDE IntelliJ IDEA Eclipse

What are some alternatives to Scrutinizer, FindBugs?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.