StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Firebase Authentication vs OmniAuth

Firebase Authentication vs OmniAuth

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OmniAuth
OmniAuth
Stacks312
Followers150
Votes9
Firebase Authentication
Firebase Authentication
Stacks533
Followers610
Votes55

Firebase Authentication vs OmniAuth: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. User base: Firebase Authentication and OmniAuth cater to different user bases. Firebase Authentication is primarily designed for developers who want a simple and secure way to authenticate users in their applications using pre-built UI components and SDKs. On the other hand, OmniAuth is more suitable for developers who need to integrate multiple authentication providers (OAuth, OpenID, etc.) into their applications.

  2. Integration flexibility: Firebase Authentication offers seamless integration with other Firebase services such as Firestore, Realtime Database, and Cloud Functions, providing a cohesive development experience. OmniAuth, being a versatile authentication solution, allows developers to integrate various third-party authentication providers, giving them more flexibility in choosing the authentication methods that best fit their applications.

  3. Community support: Firebase Authentication is supported by Google's extensive documentation, community forums, and technical support, making it easier for developers to find help and resources when needed. OmniAuth, being an open-source project, relies on its community of developers for support, which can vary in responsiveness and availability compared to Firebase's official support channels.

  4. Customization options: Firebase Authentication offers ready-to-use UI components for login, registration, password reset, and other authentication flows, making it easy for developers to quickly implement these features without much customization. In contrast, OmniAuth provides a more customizable authentication process, allowing developers to tailor the authentication workflow and user experience according to their specific requirements.

  5. Scalability: Firebase Authentication is built on Google's infrastructure, ensuring high availability, reliability, and scalability for applications with a large user base. OmniAuth's scalability, on the other hand, depends on the chosen authentication providers and their capabilities, which may vary in terms of performance and reliability.

  6. Data security: Firebase Authentication handles user authentication securely, providing features like secure token generation, password hashing, and protection against common vulnerabilities such as XSS and CSRF attacks. OmniAuth relies on the security measures implemented by the chosen authentication providers, which may vary in their level of security and compliance with industry standards.

In Summary, Firebase Authentication and OmniAuth differ in terms of user base, integration flexibility, community support, customization options, scalability, and data security.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OmniAuth
OmniAuth
Firebase Authentication
Firebase Authentication

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Multi-provider authentication;Over 200 supported authentication providers (see list at https://github.com/intridea/omniauth/wiki/List-of-Strategies);Open source
-
Statistics
Stacks
312
Stacks
533
Followers
150
Followers
610
Votes
9
Votes
55
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Easy Social Login
  • 3
    Free
Pros
  • 12
    Completely Free
  • 8
    Email/Password
  • 8
    Native App + Web integrations
  • 7
    Passwordless
  • 6
    Works seemlessly with other Firebase Services
Cons
  • 6
    Heavy webpack
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to OmniAuth, Firebase Authentication?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Satellizer

Satellizer

Satellizer is a simple to use, end-to-end, token-based authentication module for AngularJS with built-in support for Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter authentication providers, plus Email and Password sign-in method. You are not limited to the sign-in options above, in fact you can add any OAuth 1.0 or OAuth 2.0 provider by passing provider-specific information during the configuration step.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope