Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Firebase vs Zeit Now: What are the differences?
Introduction
Firebase and Zeit Now are both popular web development platforms that offer a range of features and tools. However, there are several key differences between the two platforms that should be considered when deciding which one to use for your project.
Hosting and deployment flexibility: Firebase provides an all-in-one hosting and deployment solution, allowing developers to easily deploy their web applications with just a few commands. On the other hand, Zeit Now offers a more flexible approach to hosting and deployment, supporting a wide range of deployment configurations and offering integrations with popular deployment tools like Docker. This makes Zeit Now a better choice for projects that require more control over the deployment process or have unique hosting requirements.
Backend functionality: Firebase is primarily known for its powerful backend services, which include features like real-time database, user authentication, cloud functions, and cloud messaging. These services are tightly integrated with the Firebase platform and provide a seamless experience for developers. In contrast, Zeit Now focuses more on frontend deployment and doesn't offer the same level of backend functionality as Firebase. If your project heavily relies on backend services, Firebase would be a better fit.
Serverless architecture: Firebase is built on a serverless architecture, which means that developers don't need to worry about managing servers or scaling infrastructure. This allows for easier development and deployment of applications, as the infrastructure is automatically provisioned and managed by Firebase. Zeit Now also supports serverless deployments, but it also offers the flexibility to deploy applications on traditional servers if needed. If you prefer the simplicity and scalability of serverless architecture, Firebase is the way to go.
Pricing structure: Firebase offers a freemium pricing model, with a generous free tier that includes many of its core features. This makes it a cost-effective option for small projects or startups with limited budgets. Zeit Now, on the other hand, offers a pay-as-you-go pricing structure, where you only pay for the resources you use. This can be advantageous for projects that have unpredictable or fluctuating traffic patterns, as you only pay for what you need. Consider your project's budget and resource requirements when choosing between the two platforms.
Third-party integrations: Firebase has a wide range of third-party integrations, including popular services like Google Analytics, Crashlytics, and AdMob. These integrations can be seamlessly integrated into your Firebase project, providing additional functionality and insights for your application. While Zeit Now does not offer the same level of built-in integrations, it does provide extensive support for custom integrations and workflows through its API and CLI, allowing you to connect and extend your application with other services.
Community and support: Firebase has a large and active community of developers, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available. This makes it easier to get support and find solutions to common problems. Zeit Now also has a growing community, but it may not have the same level of resources and community support as Firebase. Consider the availability of community support and resources when choosing a platform, as it can greatly impact your development experience.
In summary, Firebase and Zeit Now differ in terms of hosting and deployment flexibility, backend functionality, serverless architecture, pricing structure, third-party integrations, and community support. Choose the platform that aligns with your project's specific needs and requirements.
We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.
I would recommend looking hard into Firebase
for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.
The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore
. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.
Node.js
Express
MongoDB
Socket.IO
and Apollo
are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.
Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React
application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase
is a great way to do that.
Hello Noam 👋,
I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.
Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase
Hey Noam,
I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.
Thanks, Ilya
Pros of Firebase
- Realtime backend made easy371
- Fast and responsive270
- Easy setup242
- Real-time215
- JSON191
- Free134
- Backed by google128
- Angular adaptor83
- Reliable68
- Great customer support36
- Great documentation32
- Real-time synchronization25
- Mobile friendly21
- Rapid prototyping19
- Great security14
- Automatic scaling12
- Freakingly awesome11
- Super fast development8
- Angularfire is an amazing addition!8
- Chat8
- Firebase hosting6
- Built in user auth/oauth6
- Awesome next-gen backend6
- Ios adaptor6
- Speed of light4
- Very easy to use4
- Great3
- It's made development super fast3
- Brilliant for startups3
- Free hosting2
- Cloud functions2
- JS Offline and Sync suport2
- Low battery consumption2
- .net2
- The concurrent updates create a great experience2
- Push notification2
- I can quickly create static web apps with no backend2
- Great all-round functionality2
- Free authentication solution2
- Easy Reactjs integration1
- Google's support1
- Free SSL1
- CDN & cache out of the box1
- Easy to use1
- Large1
- Faster workflow1
- Serverless1
- Good Free Limits1
- Simple and easy1
Pros of Vercel
- Simple deployment23
- Free tier17
- Free SSL13
- Simple setup12
- Easy custom domain setup8
- Build and deploy via git push4
- One tap build4
- SSR3
- Student1
- SSG1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Firebase
- Can become expensive31
- No open source, you depend on external company16
- Scalability is not infinite15
- Not Flexible Enough9
- Cant filter queries7
- Very unstable server3
- No Relational Data3
- Too many errors2
- No offline sync2
Cons of Vercel
- Pricing Unclear1