Flood IO vs LoadNinja

Overview

Flood IO

Stacks20

Followers70

Votes5

LoadNinja

Stacks12

Followers40

Votes0

Flood IO vs LoadNinja: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Flood IO and LoadNinja are both performance testing tools that help in simulating large user loads to test the scalability and robustness of web applications. However, there are significant differences between these two tools, which are highlighted below.

Pricing Model: Flood IO is a cloud-based testing platform that provides on-demand virtual users. It has a pay-per-use pricing model, where users are billed based on the number of virtual users used and the duration of the test. On the other hand, LoadNinja offers a subscription-based pricing model, which allows users to execute unlimited tests with a fixed monthly or yearly fee.
Scripting Language: Flood IO uses a simple and intuitive scripting language called Flood Element, which is based on JavaScript. It provides an easy way to create and execute test scripts without the need for extensive programming knowledge. LoadNinja, on the other hand, uses JavaScript along with an advanced recorder feature that allows users to record their interactions with the application and convert them into test scripts.
Test Execution Environment: Flood IO offers a cloud-based load testing platform that allows users to simulate large user loads from multiple geographic locations. It provides the flexibility to choose from various cloud providers and regions to distribute the load. In contrast, LoadNinja offers a browser-based load testing solution that runs directly in the user's web browser. This allows for closer simulation of real user behavior but may have limitations in terms of the scalability of the load.
Real-Browser Load Testing: LoadNinja offers a unique feature called real-browser load testing, where tests are executed in actual web browsers running on virtual machines. This allows for accurate simulation of end-user experience and interactions with the application, including support for JavaScript-driven functionality. Flood IO, on the other hand, focuses on simulating virtual users at the HTTP/protocol level and does not provide built-in support for executing tests in real web browsers.
Collaboration and Reporting: Flood IO provides comprehensive collaboration and reporting features, allowing users to share test results, collaborate with team members, and generate detailed reports. It offers integrations with popular DevOps tools like Jira, Slack, and GitHub, making it easier to incorporate load testing into the development workflow. LoadNinja also provides collaboration and reporting features but may have fewer integrations compared to Flood IO.
Learning Curve and Ease of Use: Flood IO aims to provide a simple and intuitive user interface that requires minimal setup and configuration. It focuses on lowering the learning curve and enabling users to deploy tests quickly. LoadNinja, on the other hand, offers a more advanced and feature-rich interface, which may have a steeper learning curve but provides greater flexibility and control over test execution.

In summary, Flood IO offers a cloud-based testing platform with a pay-per-use pricing model and simple scripting language, while LoadNinja provides a browser-based load testing solution with a subscription-based pricing model and real-browser load testing capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Flood IO, LoadNinja

Vrashab

QA at Altair

Jun 23, 2020

Needs adviceon

Gatling

Locust

Flood IO

I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

142k views142k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flood IO	LoadNinja
Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk.	It is  a  cloud-based platform for engineers and performance professionals who load test web applications. It makes load testing simple and fast. Test your website and web apps on real browsers, in the cloud, without the need for dynamic correlation.
Browser-based load testing; JMeter load testing; Gatling load testing; Detailed reporting; on-premise; multi-cloud; AWS load testing	Reduce Test Script Creation Time by 60%; Generate Load with 1000s of Real Browsers; Analyze in Real-Time with VU Inspector and Debugger; Manage Your Performance Tests Efficiently & Effectively; Data-Drive Load Tests for Full Test Coverage; Test Applications in Local Network
Statistics
Stacks 20	Stacks 12
Followers 70	Followers 40
Votes 5	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Affordable 2 Great feature set 1 Easy to use	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Travis CI GitHub New Relic Jenkins Slack CircleCI Amazon API Gateway AWS IAM Flowdock	Jenkins Zephyr

What are some alternatives to Flood IO, LoadNinja?

k6

It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.

Locust

Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.

Gatling

Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.

Loader.io

Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections.

BlazeMeter

Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>

Apache JMeter

It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions.

RedLine13

It is a load testing platform that brings the low cost power of the cloud to JMeter and other open source load testing tools.

AWS Device Farm

Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors.

Blitz

Build bulletproof, scalable solutions with Blitz - a simple and fun service for load testing web apps and APIs in the cloud. Blitz offers powerful yet simple capabilities including continuous monitoring, performance testing and remediation. Blitz enables you to instantly burst up to 50,000 concurrent users against your app in seconds from multiple points of presence around the world.

Soundkit

Voice agent QA for teams who can't afford broken calls, compliance gaps, or production failures. Simulate thousands of conversations, validate legal

Related Comparisons

Flood IO vs LoadNinja: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Pricing Model: Flood IO is a cloud-based testing platform that provides on-demand virtual users. It has a pay-per-use pricing model, where users are billed based on the number of virtual users used and the duration of the test. On the other hand, LoadNinja offers a subscription-based pricing model, which allows users to execute unlimited tests with a fixed monthly or yearly fee.
Scripting Language: Flood IO uses a simple and intuitive scripting language called Flood Element, which is based on JavaScript. It provides an easy way to create and execute test scripts without the need for extensive programming knowledge. LoadNinja, on the other hand, uses JavaScript along with an advanced recorder feature that allows users to record their interactions with the application and convert them into test scripts.
Test Execution Environment: Flood IO offers a cloud-based load testing platform that allows users to simulate large user loads from multiple geographic locations. It provides the flexibility to choose from various cloud providers and regions to distribute the load. In contrast, LoadNinja offers a browser-based load testing solution that runs directly in the user's web browser. This allows for closer simulation of real user behavior but may have limitations in terms of the scalability of the load.
Real-Browser Load Testing: LoadNinja offers a unique feature called real-browser load testing, where tests are executed in actual web browsers running on virtual machines. This allows for accurate simulation of end-user experience and interactions with the application, including support for JavaScript-driven functionality. Flood IO, on the other hand, focuses on simulating virtual users at the HTTP/protocol level and does not provide built-in support for executing tests in real web browsers.
Collaboration and Reporting: Flood IO provides comprehensive collaboration and reporting features, allowing users to share test results, collaborate with team members, and generate detailed reports. It offers integrations with popular DevOps tools like Jira, Slack, and GitHub, making it easier to incorporate load testing into the development workflow. LoadNinja also provides collaboration and reporting features but may have fewer integrations compared to Flood IO.
Learning Curve and Ease of Use: Flood IO aims to provide a simple and intuitive user interface that requires minimal setup and configuration. It focuses on lowering the learning curve and enabling users to deploy tests quickly. LoadNinja, on the other hand, offers a more advanced and feature-rich interface, which may have a steeper learning curve but provides greater flexibility and control over test execution.

Flood IO vs LoadNinja

Overview