Flux CD vs Weave

Overview

Weave

Stacks50

Followers72

Votes7

Flux CD

Stacks81

Followers76

Votes1

GitHub Stars6.9K

Forks1.1K

Flux CD vs Weave: What are the differences?

Architecture Difference: Flux CD follows a GitOps approach, where the desired state of the system is defined in Git repositories and automatically deployed to the cluster. Weave, on the other hand, is focuses on automating the deployment and management of applications on Kubernetes clusters using GitOps principles but uses its own set of controllers for operations.
Community Support and Ecosystem: Flux CD has a larger community support and ecosystem with a more active open-source community contributing to its growth and development. Weave, while also being open source, may not have as extensive a community support as Flux CD, which can impact the availability of resources and features.
Integration Capabilities: Flux CD has strong integration capabilities with other tools in the Kubernetes ecosystem, such as Helm, Kustomize, and other CNCF projects, making it more versatile for different use cases. Weave may have integration capabilities but may not offer the same level of compatibility with various tools and projects.
Ease of Use and Setup: Flux CD is known for its simplicity and ease of use, with clear documentation and straightforward setup processes. Weave, while also user-friendly, may have a steeper learning curve or require more effort in terms of setup and configuration than Flux CD.
Native Kubernetes Support: Flux CD is a native Kubernetes project and closely aligned with the Kubernetes API, making it easier to work with and ensuring compatibility with Kubernetes releases. Weave, while Kubernetes-focused, may not be as closely integrated with the Kubernetes ecosystem as Flux CD.
Maturity and Stability: Flux CD has been around for longer and is considered a more mature and stable solution in the GitOps space, with a track record of consistent updates and improvements. Weave, while a reputable tool, may not have the same level of maturity and stability as Flux CD, which could affect its reliability in production environments.

In Summary, Flux CD and Weave differ in their architectural approach, community support, integration capabilities, ease of use, native Kubernetes support, and maturity/stability, with Flux CD having a stronger foundation in these aspects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Weave	Flux CD
Weave can traverse firewalls and operate in partially connected networks. Traffic can be encrypted, allowing hosts to be connected across an untrusted network. With weave you can easily construct applications consisting of multiple containers, running anywhere.	It is a tool that automatically ensures that the state of your Kubernetes cluster matches the configuration you’ve supplied in Git. It uses an operator in the cluster to trigger deployments inside Kubernetes, which means that you don’t need a separate continuous delivery tool.
Virtual Ethernet Switch;Application isolation;Security;Host network integration;Service export;Service import;Multi-cloud networking;Multi-hop routing;Dynamic topologies;Container mobility;Fault tolerance	Describe the entire desired state of your system in Git. This includes apps, configuration, dashboards, monitoring, and everything else; Use YAML to enforce conformance to the declared system. You don’t need to run kubectl because all changes go through Git. Use diffing tools to detect divergence between observed and desired state and receive notifications; Everything is controlled through pull requests, which means no learning curve for new developers. Just use your standard PR process. Your Git history provides a sequence of transactions, allowing you to recover system state from any snapshot. Fix a production issue via pull request rather than making changes to the running system
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 6.9K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.1K
Stacks 50	Stacks 81
Followers 72	Followers 76
Votes 7	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Easy setup 3 Seamlessly with mesos/marathon 1 Seamless integration with application layer	Pros 1 Open Source
Integrations
Docker boot2docker	Git Kubernetes YAML

What are some alternatives to Weave, Flux CD?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

Flux CD vs Weave: What are the differences?

Architecture Difference: Flux CD follows a GitOps approach, where the desired state of the system is defined in Git repositories and automatically deployed to the cluster. Weave, on the other hand, is focuses on automating the deployment and management of applications on Kubernetes clusters using GitOps principles but uses its own set of controllers for operations.
Community Support and Ecosystem: Flux CD has a larger community support and ecosystem with a more active open-source community contributing to its growth and development. Weave, while also being open source, may not have as extensive a community support as Flux CD, which can impact the availability of resources and features.
Integration Capabilities: Flux CD has strong integration capabilities with other tools in the Kubernetes ecosystem, such as Helm, Kustomize, and other CNCF projects, making it more versatile for different use cases. Weave may have integration capabilities but may not offer the same level of compatibility with various tools and projects.
Ease of Use and Setup: Flux CD is known for its simplicity and ease of use, with clear documentation and straightforward setup processes. Weave, while also user-friendly, may have a steeper learning curve or require more effort in terms of setup and configuration than Flux CD.
Native Kubernetes Support: Flux CD is a native Kubernetes project and closely aligned with the Kubernetes API, making it easier to work with and ensuring compatibility with Kubernetes releases. Weave, while Kubernetes-focused, may not be as closely integrated with the Kubernetes ecosystem as Flux CD.
Maturity and Stability: Flux CD has been around for longer and is considered a more mature and stable solution in the GitOps space, with a track record of consistent updates and improvements. Weave, while a reputable tool, may not have the same level of maturity and stability as Flux CD, which could affect its reliability in production environments.

Flux CD vs Weave

Overview