StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Cloud Hosting
  4. Static Web Hosting
  5. Forge vs GitHub Pages

Forge vs GitHub Pages

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub Pages
GitHub Pages
Stacks17.7K
Followers13.0K
Votes1.1K
Forge
Forge
Stacks10
Followers24
Votes1

Forge vs GitHub Pages: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will explore the key differences between Forge and GitHub Pages in a concise and specific manner.

  1. Pricing Model: Forge offers a paid subscription model (starting at $15/month) and charges for the number of deployments and team members. On the other hand, GitHub Pages is free for hosting basic static websites and has no limitations on the number of deployments or team members.

  2. Code Collaboration: Forge focuses primarily on collaboration features such as code reviews, pull requests, and project management tools. GitHub Pages, on the other hand, provides a platform for hosting static websites, but lacks comprehensive collaboration tools like those found in Forge.

  3. Native Integrations: Forge provides native integrations with popular tools such as GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, allowing seamless integration with existing workflows. GitHub Pages, being a part of GitHub, offers seamless integration with the repository management features of GitHub itself.

  4. Deployment Options: Forge supports a variety of deployment options, including native integrations with cloud hosting providers like AWS, Azure, and DigitalOcean. GitHub Pages, in contrast, is specifically designed for hosting static websites and provides only limited deployment options.

  5. Customization and Flexibility: Forge offers more flexibility in terms of customization, allowing users to fully modify the appearance and behavior of their applications. GitHub Pages, being primarily a hosting service for static websites, has limited customization options and is more focused on simplicity and ease of use.

  6. Built-in Continuous Integration (CI): Forge includes built-in CI/CD (Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment) features, allowing developers to automate their deployment workflows. GitHub Pages, on the other hand, does not provide built-in CI/CD features and requires external tools or scripts for automating deployments.

In summary, Forge offers a paid subscription model with extensive collaboration tools, native integrations, and flexible deployment options, while GitHub Pages is a free hosting service for static websites with seamless GitHub integration, simplicity in customization, and limited deployment options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub Pages, Forge

Howie
Howie

Full Stack Engineer at Yintrust

Aug 13, 2020

DecidedonNetlifyNetlify

We use Netlify to host static websites.

The reasons for choosing Netlify over GitHub Pages are as follows:

  • Netfily can bind multiple domain names, while GitHub Pages can only bind one domain name
  • With Netfily, the original repository can be private, while GitHub Pages free tier requires the original repository to be public

In addition, in order to use CDN, we use Netlify DNS.

238k views238k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub Pages
GitHub Pages
Forge
Forge

Public webpages hosted directly from your GitHub repository. Just edit, push, and your changes are live.

Fastest possible way to host lighting-fast static websites for small businesses, web startups, and app developers.

Blogging with Jekyll; Custom URLs; Automatic Page Generator
Drag & Drop, or sync with Dropbox or GitHub; Version Based History; Optimized for Speed; Collaborate with Others; Live Site Previews; File differences;
Statistics
Stacks
17.7K
Stacks
10
Followers
13.0K
Followers
24
Votes
1.1K
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 290
    Free
  • 217
    Right out of github
  • 185
    Quick to set up
  • 108
    Instant
  • 107
    Easy to learn
Cons
  • 4
    Not possible to perform HTTP redirects
  • 3
    Limited Jekyll plugins
  • 3
    Supports only Jekyll
  • 1
    Jekyll is bloated
Pros
  • 1
    Fgfgf
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
GitHub
GitHub
Dropbox
Dropbox

What are some alternatives to GitHub Pages, Forge?

DomainRacer

DomainRacer

It is a blazing fast hosting solution that provides Customer Satisfaction driven Web Hosting services since 2016.

Netlify

Netlify

Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.

Vercel

Vercel

A cloud platform for serverless deployment. It enables developers to host websites and web services that deploy instantly, scale automatically, and require no supervision, all with minimal configuration.

Surge

Surge

Surge makes it easy for developers to deploy projects to a production-quality CDN through Grunt, Gulp, npm.

Webflow

Webflow

Webflow is a responsive design tool that lets you design, build, and publish websites in an intuitive interface. Clean code included!

Divshot

Divshot

Divshot makes building and hosting front-end web applications simple. Build locally and deploy using a simple command-line interface. Divshot supports multiple environments, pushState routing, atomic deploys, and more.

GitLab Pages

GitLab Pages

Host your static websites on GitLab.com for free, or on your own GitLab Enterprise Edition instance. Use any static website generator: Jekyll, Middleman, Hexo, Hugo, Pelican, and more

Firebase Hosting

Firebase Hosting

It is production-grade web content hosting for developers. With a single command, you can quickly deploy web apps and serve both static and dynamic content to a global CDN (content delivery network). You can also pair it with Cloud Functions or Cloud Run to build and host microservices.

Runkod

Runkod

It provides decentralized hosting platform and management tools for modern javascript applications and static web publishing.

BitBalloon

BitBalloon

BitBalloon deploys static sites from development to production in one step. Sites are automatically compressed, cached and pushed to a CDN. Any forms on the site will automatically work. BitBalloon is 100% programmable, everything from deployment to form handling can be controlled through the API. White label reseller options are available for using BitBalloon as a site publishing engine inside 3rd party authoring tools.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope