StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. FortiAuthenticator vs Keycloak

FortiAuthenticator vs Keycloak

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Keycloak
Keycloak
Stacks780
Followers1.3K
Votes102
FortiAuthenticator
FortiAuthenticator
Stacks4
Followers11
Votes0

FortiAuthenticator vs Keycloak: What are the differences?

Key Differences between FortiAuthenticator and Keycloak

FortiAuthenticator and Keycloak are both authentication systems used to secure access to applications and resources. While they have similarities, there are several key differences between the two:

  1. User Management: FortiAuthenticator provides a centralized user management system that allows administrators to create and manage user accounts. Keycloak, on the other hand, delegates user management to external identity providers, allowing for more flexibility in user authentication and authorization.

  2. Scalability: FortiAuthenticator is designed for small and medium-sized enterprises, with a maximum limit on the number of users it can handle. Keycloak, on the other hand, is highly scalable and can support a large number of users, making it more suitable for enterprise-level deployments.

  3. Support for Identity Federation: Keycloak provides built-in support for identity federation, allowing users to authenticate using external identity providers such as social media accounts or enterprise identity systems. FortiAuthenticator, on the other hand, does not have native support for identity federation and requires additional configurations to enable this functionality.

  4. Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): FortiAuthenticator has built-in support for multi-factor authentication, allowing administrators to enforce additional layers of security, such as one-time passwords or biometric authentication. Keycloak also supports MFA but requires additional configuration and integration with external MFA providers.

  5. Integration with other Fortinet products: FortiAuthenticator seamlessly integrates with other Fortinet security products, such as FortiGate firewall and FortiAnalyzer, providing a unified authentication and security infrastructure. Keycloak, being an open-source solution, can integrate with various platforms and systems but may require additional customization and development efforts.

  6. Commercial Support: FortiAuthenticator is a commercial product and comes with vendor support and maintenance agreements. Keycloak, being an open-source project, relies on community support and may require additional resources and expertise to ensure proper operation and support.

In Summary, FortiAuthenticator provides centralized user management, limited scalability, and seamless integration with other Fortinet products, while Keycloak offers more flexibility in user management, scalability, and built-in support for identity federation and MFA.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Keycloak, FortiAuthenticator

sindhujasrivastava
sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

  1. Keycloak
  2. Okta
  3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Keycloak
Keycloak
FortiAuthenticator
FortiAuthenticator

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

It provides services which are key in creating effective security policy, strengthening security by ensuring only the right person at the right time can access your sensitive networks and data.

-
Ability to transparently identify network users and enforce identity-driven policy on a Fortinet-enabled enterprise network; Seamless secure two-factor/OTP authentication across the organization in conjunction with FortiToken; Certificate management for enterprise wireless and VPN deployment; Guest management for wired and wireless network security; Single Sign On capabilities for both internal and cloud networks
Statistics
Stacks
780
Stacks
4
Followers
1.3K
Followers
11
Votes
102
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    It's a open source solution
  • 24
    Supports multiple identity provider
  • 17
    OpenID and SAML support
  • 12
    Easy customisation
  • 10
    JSON web token
Cons
  • 7
    Okta
  • 6
    Poor client side documentation
  • 5
    Lack of Code examples for client side
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Keycloak, FortiAuthenticator?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope