Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Foundation vs mini.css: What are the differences?
Developers describe Foundation as "The most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world". Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices. On the other hand, mini.css is detailed as "Responsive, style-agnostic CSS framework". mini.css is a lightweight CSS framework (under 7KB gzipped) designed with mobile devices and modern browsers in mind. Responsiveness, ease of use and customization are some of the main features of the framework, while accessibility and extensive documentation are some of the secondary focuses of the project.
Foundation and mini.css can be categorized as "Front-End Frameworks" tools.
"Responsive grid" is the primary reason why developers consider Foundation over the competitors, whereas "Works great on mobile and loads very fast" was stated as the key factor in picking mini.css.
Foundation and mini.css are both open source tools. It seems that Foundation with 28.2K GitHub stars and 5.77K forks on GitHub has more adoption than mini.css with 2.67K GitHub stars and 143 GitHub forks.
Pros of Foundation
- Responsive grid160
- Mobile first93
- Open source80
- Semantic75
- Customizable72
- Quick to prototype52
- Simple ui50
- Fast45
- Best practices44
- Easy setup39
- Neutral style6
- HTML, SCSS and JS6
- Accessibility support5
- Professional5
- Xy grid3
- Sass2
- Every new version is smaller, smarter & more efficient2
- Robust1
Pros of mini.css
- Works great on mobile and loads very fast4
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Foundation
- Requires jQuery5
- Awful site4