Foundation vs Skeleton

Overview

Foundation

Stacks1.2K

Followers1.2K

Votes740

Skeleton

Stacks54

Followers100

Votes24

GitHub Stars19.7K

Forks3.1K

Foundation vs Skeleton: What are the differences?

1. **Grid System:** Foundation offers a more customizable and flexible grid system with the ability to create complex layouts with ease, while Skeleton provides a simpler and more lightweight grid system suitable for basic projects. 2. **Component Library:** Foundation comes with a more extensive collection of pre-designed components and plugins, offering a wider range of functionality out of the box compared to Skeleton, which has a more minimalistic set of components. 3. **Customization Options:** Foundation provides more options for customization and theming, allowing developers to fine-tune every aspect of their design, whereas Skeleton is more opinionated and limited in terms of customization. 4. **Community Support:** Foundation has a larger and more active community, with more resources, tutorials, and community-driven plugins available, compared to Skeleton, which has a smaller community and fewer resources for support and extension. 5. **JavaScript Integration:** Foundation has more robust JavaScript integration with a built-in JavaScript library for enhanced interactivity and functionality, while Skeleton focuses more on lightweight and CSS-centric design, requiring additional JavaScript frameworks for advanced features. 6. **Browser Compatibility:** Foundation places a stronger emphasis on cross-browser compatibility, ensuring that designs work seamlessly across different browsers, while Skeleton focuses on a mobile-first approach and may not prioritize certain older browsers.

In Summary, Foundation and Skeleton differ in their grid systems, component libraries, customization options, community support, JavaScript integration, and browser compatibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Foundation	Skeleton
Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.	Skeleton is a small collection of CSS files that can help you rapidly develop sites that look beautiful at any size, be it a 17" laptop screen or an iPhone.
Semantic: Everything is semantic. You can have the cleanest markup without sacrificing the utility and speed of Foundation.;Mobile First: You can build for small devices first. Then, as devices get larger and larger, layer in more complexity for a complete responsive design.;Customizable: You can customize your build to include or remove certain elements, as well as define the size of columns, colors, font size and more.;Professional: Millions of designers and developers depend on Foundation. Now we have business support, training and consulting to help grow your product or service.	Responsive Grid Down To Mobile;Fast to Start;Style Agnostic;
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 19.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 3.1K
Stacks 1.2K	Stacks 54
Followers 1.2K	Followers 100
Votes 740	Votes 24
Pros & Cons
Pros 160 Responsive grid 93 Mobile first 80 Open source 75 Semantic 72 Customizable Cons 5 Requires jQuery 4 Awful site	Pros 9 Minimalist 6 Responsive 4 Simple 2 Fantastically straight forward 1 Lightweight, clean syntax Cons 0 Have to make design decisions

What are some alternatives to Foundation, Skeleton?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Foundation vs Skeleton: What are the differences?

In Summary, Foundation and Skeleton differ in their grid systems, component libraries, customization options, community support, JavaScript integration, and browser compatibility.

Foundation vs Skeleton

Overview