Foundation vs UIkIt

Overview

Foundation

Stacks1.2K

Followers1.2K

Votes740

UIkIt

Stacks791

Followers417

Votes262

GitHub Stars18.5K

Forks2.3K

Foundation vs UIkIt: What are the differences?

Introduction

In web development, Foundation and UIkit are both popular front-end frameworks that provide a set of tools and components to simplify the process of building responsive websites. Despite their similarities, there are key differences that set them apart.

CSS Framework: Foundation primarily uses SASS (Syntactically Awesome Stylesheets) as its CSS preprocessor, which allows for more customizable styling options. On the other hand, UIkit uses the LESS (Leaner CSS) preprocessor, which is known for its simplicity and ease of use.
JavaScript Integration: Foundation relies on jQuery as its primary JavaScript library for various functionalities. This integration with jQuery allows for extensive DOM manipulation and AJAX support. In contrast, UIkit includes its own lightweight JavaScript modular library, reducing the reliance on external libraries and improving overall performance.
Grid System: Both Foundation and UIkit offer grid systems to create responsive layouts, but they have slight differences. Foundation's grid system has a more complex structure, with different classes for various screen sizes, allowing for greater flexibility in designing responsive layouts. UIkit, on the other hand, has a simpler grid system with predefined classes for different breakpoints, making it easier to quickly implement responsive designs.
Component Customization: Foundation provides a wide range of customization options for its components, allowing developers to modify various aspects such as colors, sizes, and styles. UIkit also offers customization options, but they are generally more limited compared to Foundation. However, UIkit provides a modular approach, where components can be easily combined and customized using LESS variables.
Third Party Integration: Foundation has better compatibility with third-party libraries and plugins due to its extensive use of jQuery. This allows for seamless integration with popular JavaScript libraries and frameworks. UIkit, on the other hand, has a more self-contained approach, offering its own set of integrated components and modules without relying heavily on external dependencies.
Community and Documentation: Foundation has a larger and more active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources available. This makes it easier for developers to find help and resources when using Foundation for their projects. While UIkit also has a supportive community, it may have relatively fewer resources and documentation compared to Foundation.

In summary, Foundation and UIkit have different approaches to CSS preprocessing, JavaScript integration, grid systems, component customization, third-party integration, and community support. These differences make each framework suitable for different project requirements and developer preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Foundation, UIkIt

Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceon

New Relic

Next.js

React

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M

Comments

Sai Karun

Jan 30, 2020

Needs advice

We are re-modifying the existing portal to the new one. Looking out for a CSS framework where over-rides are possible, the performance of page loading, extendable, etc Please suggest between tailwind, UIkit and bootstrap frameworks explaining in detail on different factors. I request your help on the same.

595k views595k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Foundation	UIkIt
Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.	UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.
Semantic: Everything is semantic. You can have the cleanest markup without sacrificing the utility and speed of Foundation.;Mobile First: You can build for small devices first. Then, as devices get larger and larger, layer in more complexity for a complete responsive design.;Customizable: You can customize your build to include or remove certain elements, as well as define the size of columns, colors, font size and more.;Professional: Millions of designers and developers depend on Foundation. Now we have business support, training and consulting to help grow your product or service.	LESS - UIkit is developed in LESS to write well-structured, extendable code which is easy to maintain.;Components - A collection of small, responsive components using consistent and conflict-free naming conventions.;Customizer - UIkit's very basic style can be extended with themes and is easy to customize to create your own look.;Responsive - With the mobile-first approach UIkit provides a consistent experience from phones and tablets to desktops.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 18.5K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.3K
Stacks 1.2K	Stacks 791
Followers 1.2K	Followers 417
Votes 740	Votes 262
Pros & Cons
Pros 160 Responsive grid 93 Mobile first 80 Open source 75 Semantic 72 Customizable Cons 5 Requires jQuery 4 Awful site	Pros 39 Complete GUI 29 Easy modify 27 Practical 24 Easy to learn 24 Functional

What are some alternatives to Foundation, UIkIt?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Vuetify

Vuetify is a component framework for Vue.js 2. It aims to provide clean, semantic and reusable components that make building your application a breeze. Vuetify utilizes Google's Material Design design pattern, taking cues from other popular frameworks such as Materialize.css, Material Design Lite, Semantic UI and Bootstrap 4.

Related Comparisons

Foundation vs UIkIt: What are the differences?

Introduction

CSS Framework: Foundation primarily uses SASS (Syntactically Awesome Stylesheets) as its CSS preprocessor, which allows for more customizable styling options. On the other hand, UIkit uses the LESS (Leaner CSS) preprocessor, which is known for its simplicity and ease of use.
JavaScript Integration: Foundation relies on jQuery as its primary JavaScript library for various functionalities. This integration with jQuery allows for extensive DOM manipulation and AJAX support. In contrast, UIkit includes its own lightweight JavaScript modular library, reducing the reliance on external libraries and improving overall performance.
Grid System: Both Foundation and UIkit offer grid systems to create responsive layouts, but they have slight differences. Foundation's grid system has a more complex structure, with different classes for various screen sizes, allowing for greater flexibility in designing responsive layouts. UIkit, on the other hand, has a simpler grid system with predefined classes for different breakpoints, making it easier to quickly implement responsive designs.
Component Customization: Foundation provides a wide range of customization options for its components, allowing developers to modify various aspects such as colors, sizes, and styles. UIkit also offers customization options, but they are generally more limited compared to Foundation. However, UIkit provides a modular approach, where components can be easily combined and customized using LESS variables.
Third Party Integration: Foundation has better compatibility with third-party libraries and plugins due to its extensive use of jQuery. This allows for seamless integration with popular JavaScript libraries and frameworks. UIkit, on the other hand, has a more self-contained approach, offering its own set of integrated components and modules without relying heavily on external dependencies.
Community and Documentation: Foundation has a larger and more active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources available. This makes it easier for developers to find help and resources when using Foundation for their projects. While UIkit also has a supportive community, it may have relatively fewer resources and documentation compared to Foundation.

Foundation vs UIkIt

Overview