StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. FreeRADIUS vs LDAP

FreeRADIUS vs LDAP

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenLDAP
OpenLDAP
Stacks95
Followers132
Votes0
FreeRADIUS
FreeRADIUS
Stacks28
Followers36
Votes1

FreeRADIUS vs LDAP: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this markdown, we will outline the key differences between FreeRADIUS and LDAP.

1. **Authentication Mechanism**: FreeRADIUS is a widely-used open-source authentication, authorization, and accounting protocol. It is typically used for providing network access control. On the other hand, LDAP (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol) is a protocol used for accessing and maintaining directory services. While FreeRADIUS focuses on authentication services, LDAP is primarily used for directory services.

2. **Protocol Usage**: FreeRADIUS uses the RADIUS protocol for communication between client devices and the authentication server, providing a centralized authentication mechanism for network devices. In contrast, LDAP uses the LDAP protocol for accessing and querying directory services, enabling the retrieval of data stored in directories such as user information and permissions.

3. **Scalability**: FreeRADIUS is known for its scalability, capable of handling a large number of authentication requests efficiently. It can be deployed in networks of varying sizes, making it suitable for both small-scale and enterprise-level deployments. LDAP, on the other hand, may face scalability challenges when dealing with a high volume of directory queries and updates, requiring careful design and optimization for larger deployments.

4. **Security Features**: FreeRADIUS offers extensive security features such as support for various authentication protocols, encryption mechanisms, and access control mechanisms to ensure secure communication between clients and servers. LDAP also provides security features, including authentication mechanisms like Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) for secure data transmission.

5. **Data Structure**: FreeRADIUS stores user authentication data, access policies, and accounting information in its database, using a structured format suitable for network access control. In contrast, LDAP stores data in a hierarchical directory structure, organizing information in a tree-like format with entries representing objects like users, groups, and organizational units.

6. **Use Cases**: FreeRADIUS is commonly used in environments where centralized authentication for network access control is required, such as corporate networks, educational institutions, and service providers. LDAP, on the other hand, is often used for directory services like user authentication, access control, and storing organizational data in a structured manner.

In Summary, the key differences between FreeRADIUS and LDAP lie in their focus on authentication versus directory services, protocol usage, scalability, security features, data structure, and use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenLDAP
OpenLDAP
FreeRADIUS
FreeRADIUS

It is a free, open-source implementation of the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol. Lightweight Directory Access is an application protocol that is used to crosscheck information on the server end.

It is the open source implementation of RADIUS, an IETF protocol for AAA (Authorisation, Authentication, and Accounting).. It is responsible for authenticating one third of all users on the Internet.

Statistics
Stacks
95
Stacks
28
Followers
132
Followers
36
Votes
0
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Very Lightweight
Integrations
No integrations available
PHP
PHP
MySQL
MySQL

What are some alternatives to OpenLDAP, FreeRADIUS ?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope