Fugue vs Hashicorp Sentinel

Overview

Fugue

Stacks6

Followers8

Votes0

Hashicorp Sentinel

Stacks25

Followers28

Votes0

Fugue vs Hashicorp Sentinel: What are the differences?

Integration with Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) Tools: Fugue seamlessly integrates with common IaC tools like Terraform, CloudFormation, and others, allowing users to enforce infrastructure security and compliance policies during the development and deployment process. On the other hand, Hashicorp Sentinel is a policy as code framework that works directly with HashiCorp Terraform Enterprise, providing policy enforcement capabilities within the Terraform workflow.
Policy Authoring Languages: Fugue enables users to define infrastructure policies using Rego, a query language used in the Open Policy Agent (OPA) project, offering rich policy modeling capabilities. In contrast, Hashicorp Sentinel leverages the HashiCorp Configuration Language (HCL), allowing users to write policies in a human-readable format that aligns closely with Terraform configuration syntax.
Policy Enforcement Workflow: Fugue enforces policies in real-time during the infrastructure deployment process, providing immediate feedback to developers and operators about policy violations. Hashicorp Sentinel, on the other hand, integrates policy checks into the Terraform plan and apply workflow, allowing users to review and remediate policy failures before infrastructure changes are applied.
Community and Ecosystem Support: Fugue has a growing community and ecosystem, providing users with resources, plugins, and integrations to extend the platform's capabilities. Hashicorp Sentinel benefits from the broader HashiCorp ecosystem, including support for Terraform modules, shared workspaces, and integration with other HashiCorp tools like Vault and Consul.
Scalability and Enterprise Readiness: Fugue is designed for enterprise-scale environments, offering capabilities for multi-account and multi-cloud management, RBAC, and audit trails. Hashicorp Sentinel, while powerful for policy enforcement in Terraform Enterprise, may require additional customization for large-scale deployment scenarios and multi-cloud environments.
Granular Policy Control: Fugue provides granular control over policy definitions, allowing users to define complex policies based on resource attributes, metadata, and dependencies. In comparison, Hashicorp Sentinel focuses on policy as code for Terraform configurations, providing a more targeted approach to policy enforcement within the Terraform workflow.

In Summary, Fugue and Hashicorp Sentinel differ in their integration with IaC tools, policy authoring languages, policy enforcement workflows, community support, scalability for enterprise environments, and granular policy control.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Fugue	Hashicorp Sentinel
It is a venture-backed software company that ensures cloud infrastructure stays in continuous compliance with enterprise security policies. Its an automation tool for enterprise cloud operations and DevOps. Build, enforce, and deploy faster without human error. Control your cloud with Fugue.	Sentinel is an embeddable policy as code framework to enable fine-grained, logic-based policy decisions that can be extended to source external information to make decisions.
CI/CD Pipelines; Log Management and SIEM Tools; Digital Workflow Tools Cloud Security	policy as code;Fine-grained, condition-based policy; Multiple enforcement levels; Multi-cloud compatible
Statistics
Stacks 6	Stacks 25
Followers 8	Followers 28
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
DigitalOcean CloudFlare Consul Heroku OpenStack DNSimple Scaleway SecretHub Gradient°	Nomad Vault Terraform Consul

What are some alternatives to Fugue, Hashicorp Sentinel?

AWS CloudFormation

You can use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create your own templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run your application. You don’t need to figure out the order in which AWS services need to be provisioned or the subtleties of how to make those dependencies work.

Packer

Packer automates the creation of any type of machine image. It embraces modern configuration management by encouraging you to use automated scripts to install and configure the software within your Packer-made images.

Scalr

Scalr is a remote state & operations backend for Terraform with access controls, policy as code, and many quality of life features.

Pulumi

Pulumi is a cloud development platform that makes creating cloud programs easy and productive. Skip the YAML and just write code. Pulumi is multi-language, multi-cloud and fully extensible in both its engine and ecosystem of packages.

Azure Resource Manager

It is the deployment and management service for Azure. It provides a management layer that enables you to create, update, and delete resources in your Azure subscription. You use management features, like access control, locks, and tags, to secure and organize your resources after deployment.

Habitat

Habitat is a new approach to automation that focuses on the application instead of the infrastructure it runs on. With Habitat, the apps you build, deploy, and manage behave consistently in any runtime — metal, VMs, containers, and PaaS. You'll spend less time on the environment and more time building features.

Google Cloud Deployment Manager

Google Cloud Deployment Manager allows you to specify all the resources needed for your application in a declarative format using yaml.

AWS Cloud Development Kit

It is an open source software development framework to model and provision your cloud application resources using familiar programming languages. It uses the familiarity and expressive power of programming languages for modeling your applications. It provides you with high-level components that preconfigure cloud resources with proven defaults, so you can build cloud applications without needing to be an expert.

Yocto

It is an open source collaboration project that helps developers create custom Linux-based systems regardless of the hardware architecture. It provides a flexible set of tools and a space where embedded developers worldwide can share technologies, software stacks, configurations, and best practices that can be used to create tailored Linux images for embedded and IOT devices, or anywhere a customized Linux OS is needed.

GeoEngineer

GeoEngineer uses Terraform to plan and execute changes, so the DSL to describe resources is similar to Terraform's. GeoEngineer's DSL also provides programming and object oriented features like inheritance, abstraction, branching and looping.

Related Comparisons

Fugue vs Hashicorp Sentinel: What are the differences?

Integration with Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) Tools: Fugue seamlessly integrates with common IaC tools like Terraform, CloudFormation, and others, allowing users to enforce infrastructure security and compliance policies during the development and deployment process. On the other hand, Hashicorp Sentinel is a policy as code framework that works directly with HashiCorp Terraform Enterprise, providing policy enforcement capabilities within the Terraform workflow.
Policy Authoring Languages: Fugue enables users to define infrastructure policies using Rego, a query language used in the Open Policy Agent (OPA) project, offering rich policy modeling capabilities. In contrast, Hashicorp Sentinel leverages the HashiCorp Configuration Language (HCL), allowing users to write policies in a human-readable format that aligns closely with Terraform configuration syntax.
Policy Enforcement Workflow: Fugue enforces policies in real-time during the infrastructure deployment process, providing immediate feedback to developers and operators about policy violations. Hashicorp Sentinel, on the other hand, integrates policy checks into the Terraform plan and apply workflow, allowing users to review and remediate policy failures before infrastructure changes are applied.
Community and Ecosystem Support: Fugue has a growing community and ecosystem, providing users with resources, plugins, and integrations to extend the platform's capabilities. Hashicorp Sentinel benefits from the broader HashiCorp ecosystem, including support for Terraform modules, shared workspaces, and integration with other HashiCorp tools like Vault and Consul.
Scalability and Enterprise Readiness: Fugue is designed for enterprise-scale environments, offering capabilities for multi-account and multi-cloud management, RBAC, and audit trails. Hashicorp Sentinel, while powerful for policy enforcement in Terraform Enterprise, may require additional customization for large-scale deployment scenarios and multi-cloud environments.
Granular Policy Control: Fugue provides granular control over policy definitions, allowing users to define complex policies based on resource attributes, metadata, and dependencies. In comparison, Hashicorp Sentinel focuses on policy as code for Terraform configurations, providing a more targeted approach to policy enforcement within the Terraform workflow.

Fugue vs Hashicorp Sentinel

Overview