FullStack Boilerplate vs Node.js

Overview

Node.js

Stacks200.4K

Followers164.5K

Votes8.5K

GitHub Stars114.1K

Forks33.7K

FullStack Boilerplate

Stacks7

Followers30

Votes0

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

FullStack Boilerplate vs Node.js: What are the differences?

## Introduction

1. **Project Structure**: The FullStack Boilerplate is pre-configured with a structured project layout including both front-end and back-end components, while Node.js is a runtime environment that lets you run JavaScript on the server side.
   
2. **Tech Stack**: FullStack Boilerplate includes a variety of technologies and frameworks for both front-end and back-end development, while Node.js is solely a runtime environment that executes JavaScript code on the server side.

3. **Features**: The FullStack Boilerplate provides common features such as authentication, authorization, database integration, and API endpoints, whereas Node.js does not come with built-in features and requires additional frameworks or modules for such functionalities.

4. **Community Support**: FullStack Boilerplate may have community support for common issues and updates, while Node.js has a larger community that provides extensive support, libraries, and resources for a wider range of development needs.

5. **Ease of Use**: FullStack Boilerplate simplifies the process of setting up a new project by providing a ready-to-use template with pre-configured settings, libraries, and dependencies, whereas Node.js requires manual installation and configuration of necessary components.

6. **Extensibility**: FullStack Boilerplate may allow for easy customization and extension through the use of plugins, modules, or additional configurations, which may not be as straightforward in the case of Node.js.

In Summary, the FullStack Boilerplate offers a structured project layout, integrated technologies, common features, community support, ease of use, and extensibility compared to Node.js.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Node.js, FullStack Boilerplate

abderrahmane

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

I am a front-end guy and in the last month I've been trynig to be learn backend in python. I think python is a great language to but when i start to learn django I didn't like it because everythong is already done for you, you dont need to do much make it works and I like coding thing that take me time. I've been thinking about switching to another programing language or just learn Node js and stick with it. I need to know if django is that easy.

136k views136k

Comments

Mohammad

Oct 28, 2019

Needs adviceon

Node.js

Laravel

PHP

I want to create a video sharing service like Youtube, which users can use to upload and watch videos. I prefer to use Vue.js for front-end. What do you suggest for the back-end? @{Node.js}|tool:1011| or @{Laravel}|tool:992| ( @{PHP}|tool:991| ) I need a good performance with high speed, and the most important thing is the ability to handle user's requests if the site's traffic increases. I want to create an algorithm that users who watch others videos earn points (randomly but in clear context) If you have anything else to improve, please let me know. For eg: If you prefer React to Vue.js. Thanks in advance

309k views309k

Comments

Zubair

Director at Aafiyah Technologies

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

Hi Team

I want your suggestions in order for me to decide which stack is suitable for the below-mentioned requirement.

Currently, I am considering building it in Wordpress (Starting with prebuilt plugins and develop on it)

But I am skeptical, so I am considering Laravel.

And recently I found one very good solution built in Angular, Node and MySQL

Here are the high-level goals I am trying to achieve:

The system has 3 modules

Multi-Vendor e-commerce Market Place
Peer to peer Selling of used items
Listing/ Directory kind of portal for the service industry

290k views290k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Node.js	FullStack Boilerplate
Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.	The client was built using react-native-web really easy to turn into a mobile app. The server is written in Node.js.and uses GraphQL with apollo-server for delivering data between client and server and typegoose for interacting with Mongo.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 114.1K	GitHub Stars 0
GitHub Forks 33.7K	GitHub Forks 0
Stacks 200.4K	Stacks 7
Followers 164.5K	Followers 30
Votes 8.5K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1439 Npm 1279 Javascript 1129 Great libraries 1012 High-performance 805 Open source Cons 46 Bound to a single CPU 45 New framework every day 40 Lots of terrible examples on the internet 33 Asynchronous programming is the worst 24 Callback	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	TypeScript Apollo React Native GraphQL MongoDB

What are some alternatives to Node.js, FullStack Boilerplate?

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

FullStack Boilerplate vs Node.js: What are the differences?

## Introduction

1. **Project Structure**: The FullStack Boilerplate is pre-configured with a structured project layout including both front-end and back-end components, while Node.js is a runtime environment that lets you run JavaScript on the server side.
   
2. **Tech Stack**: FullStack Boilerplate includes a variety of technologies and frameworks for both front-end and back-end development, while Node.js is solely a runtime environment that executes JavaScript code on the server side.

3. **Features**: The FullStack Boilerplate provides common features such as authentication, authorization, database integration, and API endpoints, whereas Node.js does not come with built-in features and requires additional frameworks or modules for such functionalities.

4. **Community Support**: FullStack Boilerplate may have community support for common issues and updates, while Node.js has a larger community that provides extensive support, libraries, and resources for a wider range of development needs.

5. **Ease of Use**: FullStack Boilerplate simplifies the process of setting up a new project by providing a ready-to-use template with pre-configured settings, libraries, and dependencies, whereas Node.js requires manual installation and configuration of necessary components.

6. **Extensibility**: FullStack Boilerplate may allow for easy customization and extension through the use of plugins, modules, or additional configurations, which may not be as straightforward in the case of Node.js.

In Summary, the FullStack Boilerplate offers a structured project layout, integrated technologies, common features, community support, ease of use, and extensibility compared to Node.js.

FullStack Boilerplate vs Node.js

Overview