Galen vs Lucet | What are the differences? | StackShare

Galen vs Lucet

Overview

Galen

Stacks11

Followers14

Votes0

GitHub Stars1.4K

Forks163

Lucet

Stacks3

Followers9

Votes0

Lucet vs Galen: What are the differences?

Developers describe Lucet as "The Sandboxing WebAssembly Compiler". A native WebAssembly compiler and runtime. It is designed to safely execute untrusted WebAssembly programs inside your application. On the other hand, Galen is detailed as "Automated testing of responsive design and html layout for web applications". It is a tool for testing layout of responsive web apps. It is based on Selenium and has a special language for testing page layout.

Lucet can be classified as a tool in the "Code Automation Tools" category, while Galen is grouped under "Browser Testing".

Lucet and Galen are both open source tools. It seems that Lucet with 2.42K GitHub stars and 80 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Galen with 1.33K GitHub stars and 143 GitHub forks.

🔥 Trending in Testing Frameworks on StackShare

Skyvern Testing Frameworks

Browser automation using LLMs and computer vision

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

Detailed Comparison

Galen	Lucet
It is a tool for testing layout of responsive web apps. It is based on Selenium and has a special language for testing page layout	A native WebAssembly compiler and runtime. It is designed to safely execute untrusted WebAssembly programs inside your application.
Responsive; Cross-browser layout testing; Functional testing	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 1.4K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 163	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 11	Stacks 3
Followers 14	Followers 9
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
BrowserStack Java Selenium C#	Rust Linux

What are some alternatives to Galen, Lucet?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

Telosys

It is an Open Source code generator. It generates the plumbing and repetitive code for any kind of language. It has been designed to be light and very simple to use.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.