Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Gridsome vs Hugo: What are the differences?

  1. 1. Templating Language: One key difference between Gridsome and Hugo is the templating language used. Gridsome uses Vue.js as its templating language, which provides a more dynamic and reactive approach to building websites. On the other hand, Hugo uses its own templating language called Hugo Templates, which is simple and fast.

  2. 2. Build Speed: Another significant difference is the build speed of the websites. Gridsome uses GraphQL to fetch and manage data, which allows for highly efficient data fetching and faster build times. On the contrary, Hugo is known for its incredible build speed, being one of the fastest static site generators available.

  3. 3. Plugin Ecosystem: Gridsome and Hugo also differ in terms of their plugin ecosystems. Gridsome has a growing and active plugin ecosystem with various plugins available to extend its functionality. On the other hand, Hugo has a vast number of highly optimized and well-documented community-created themes and templates.

  4. 4. Content Sources: Gridsome and Hugo differ in the types of content sources they can integrate with. Gridsome excels in pulling data from multiple sources like Markdown files, headless CMSs, APIs, and databases using GraphQL. In contrast, Hugo primarily focuses on static content sources such as Markdown files and JSON/YAML data.

  5. 5. Asset Pipeline: Another difference between Gridsome and Hugo is the way they handle assets like images and stylesheets. Gridsome leverages the power of webpack and allows developers to import and optimize assets effortlessly. In contrast, Hugo follows a simpler approach where developers need to manually handle the assets and place them in the appropriate directories.

  6. 6. Community Support: Gridsome and Hugo also differ in terms of their community support. Gridsome has a growing community with active developers and regular updates, but it is relatively newer compared to Hugo. Hugo, on the other hand, has an extensive and mature community with a vast amount of documentation, forums, and resources available.

In Summary, Gridsome and Hugo differ in their templating language, build speed, plugin ecosystem, content sources, asset pipeline, and community support.

Decisions about
Manuel Feller
Frontend Engineer at BI X · | 4 upvotes · 173.6K views

As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML or Markdown (what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What are some alternatives to ?
Nuxt.js
Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.
VuePress
A minimalistic static site generator with a Vue-powered theming system, and a default theme optimized for writing technical documentation. It was created to support the documentation needs of Vue's own sub projects.
Postman
It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.
Postman
It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.
Stack Overflow
Stack Overflow is a question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers. It's built and run by you as part of the Stack Exchange network of Q&A sites. With your help, we're working together to build a library of detailed answers to every question about programming.