StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Hosted Package Repository
  5. Gemfury vs npm

Gemfury vs npm

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gemfury
Gemfury
Stacks21
Followers23
Votes6
npm
npm
Stacks137.4K
Followers82.2K
Votes1.6K
GitHub Stars17.6K
Forks3.0K

Gemfury vs npm: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When it comes to managing and distributing packages in web development, there are several tools available, each with its own set of features and capabilities. Two popular options for managing packages are Gemfury and npm. While both of these tools serve a similar purpose, there are key differences that set them apart from each other.

1. Package Types:

Gemfury is a platform that supports various package types, including RubyGems, npm, Python, and more. This means that you can use Gemfury to manage packages for multiple programming languages, making it a versatile choice for developers working on different projects. On the other hand, npm is mainly focused on JavaScript packages and is specifically designed to work with JavaScript libraries and frameworks.

2. Authentication and Security:

Gemfury provides fine-grained access control and allows you to authenticate and secure your packages using a variety of methods, including OAuth, SSL, and IP whitelisting. This ensures that only authorized users have access to your packages, enhancing the security of your code. In contrast, npm does not provide built-in access control mechanisms, and securing packages is usually done through the use of private registries or other authentication methods.

3. Private Package Hosting:

Gemfury offers a private package hosting feature that allows you to securely host and share your packages with specific users or teams. This is particularly useful if you are developing proprietary code or if you want to limit the distribution of your packages to a select group of people. In contrast, npm does not have built-in support for private package hosting and usually requires the use of private registries or other third-party services.

4. Continuous Integration and Deployment:

Gemfury provides integration with popular continuous integration and deployment tools like Travis CI and Heroku. This allows you to seamlessly integrate your package management workflow with your existing development and deployment processes. On the other hand, npm does not have direct integration with these tools, and you may need to set up additional configurations or scripts to achieve similar functionality.

5. Package Mirroring:

Gemfury allows you to mirror packages from external sources, such as npm, PyPI, or Composer. This means that you can fetch and store packages from these sources on Gemfury, enabling faster and more reliable package installations for your projects. npm, on the other hand, does not offer built-in package mirroring functionality, and package installations are typically done directly from the npm registry.

6. Pricing and Licensing:

Gemfury offers pricing plans that cater to both individual developers and teams, with features such as increased storage limits and team collaboration tools. It also provides a free plan with limited storage and features for developers to get started. npm, on the other hand, is primarily an open-source project and offers the npm registry as a free service. However, npm also offers paid plans for enterprise users that include additional features and support options.

In Summary, Gemfury supports multiple package types, provides fine-grained access control, offers private package hosting, integrates with CI/CD tools, provides package mirroring capabilities, and offers flexible pricing plans. On the other hand, npm focuses primarily on JavaScript packages, lacks built-in access control and private package hosting, requires additional configurations for CI/CD integration, does not support package mirroring, and offers free and enterprise pricing options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Gemfury, npm

StackShare
StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsnpmnpmYarnYarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k
Comments
Mark
Mark

CTO at Gemsotec bvba

Apr 25, 2019

ReviewonReactReactTypeScriptTypeScriptYarnYarn

I use npm because I also mainly use React and TypeScript. Since several typings (from DefinitelyTyped) depend on the React typings, Yarn tends to mess up which leads to duplicate libraries present (different versions of the same type definition), which hinders the Typescript compiler. Npm always resolves to a single version per transitive dependency. At least that's my experience with both.

251k views251k
Comments
Oleksandr
Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Dec 7, 2019

Decided

As we have to build the application for many different TV platforms we want to split the application logic from the device/platform specific code. Previously we had different repositories and it was very hard to keep the development process when changes were done in multiple repositories, as we had to synchronize code reviews as well as merging and then updating the dependencies of projects. This issues would be even more critical when building the project from scratch what we did at Joyn. Therefor to keep all code in one place, at the same time keeping in separated in different modules we decided to give a try to monorepo. First we tried out lerna which was fine at the beginning, but later along the way we had issues with adding new dependencies which came out of the blue and were not easy to fix. Next round of evolution was yarn workspaces, we are still using it and are pretty happy with dev experience it provides. And one more advantage we got when switched to yarn workspaces that we also switched from npm to yarn what improved the state of the lock file a lot, because with npm package-lock file was updated every time you run npm install, frequent updates of package-lock file were causing very often merge conflicts. So right now we not just having faster dependencies installation time but also no conflicts coming from lock file.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Gemfury
Gemfury
npm
npm

Hosted service for your private and custom packages to simplify your deployment story. Once you upload your packages and enable your Gemfury repository, you can securely deploy any package to any host. Your private RubyGems, Python packages, and NPM modules will be safe and within reach on Gemfury. Install them to any machine in minutes without worrying about running and securing your own private repository.<br>

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

Gemfury works with RubyGems, Python packages, NPM modules, and all compatible frameworks and services.;Authenticated Repo-URL keeps your private packages safe and secure during deployment. All management and deployment is done over SSL.;Do everything you need with just a few terminal commands.;Gemfury is designed for teams. Share your account with coworkers and let them easily access your packages.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
17.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.0K
Stacks
21
Stacks
137.4K
Followers
23
Followers
82.2K
Votes
6
Votes
1.6K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Easy Integration
  • 2
    Easy Setup
  • 1
    APT repository
  • 1
    Multiple Repository Types
Pros
  • 648
    Best package management system for javascript
  • 382
    Open-source
  • 327
    Great community
  • 148
    More packages than rubygems, pypi, or packagist
  • 112
    Nice people matter
Cons
  • 5
    Bad at package versioning and being deterministic
  • 5
    Problems with lockfiles
  • 3
    Node-gyp takes forever
  • 1
    Super slow
Integrations
Heroku
Heroku
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Gemfury, npm?

RequireJS

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Yarn

Yarn

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

Component

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

Conan

Conan

Install or build your own packages for any platform. Conan also allows you to run your own server easily from the command line.

Verdaccio

Verdaccio

A simple, zero-config-required local private npm registry. Comes out of the box with its own tiny database, and the ability to proxy other registries (eg. npmjs.org), caching the downloaded modules along the way.

pip

pip

It is the package installer for Python. You can use pip to install packages from the Python Package Index and other indexes.

fpm

fpm

It helps you build packages quickly and easily (Packages like RPM and DEB formats).

Duo

Duo

Duo is a next-generation package manager that blends the best ideas from Component, Browserify and Go to make organizing and writing front-end code quick and painless.

Pika.dev

Pika.dev

It is a new kind of package registry for the modern web. It handles formatting, configuring, building and publishing every package on the registry, so that individual authors don't have to.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana