Ghost vs Typo3: What are the differences?

1. Architecture: Ghost is a headless CMS, focusing primarily on content creation and delivery, while Typo3 is a traditional CMS with a more complex architecture, offering a wider array of features, including frontend rendering capabilities. 2. User Interface: Ghost has a minimalist, user-friendly interface tailored for writers and bloggers, whereas Typo3 has a more versatile but complex interface that caters to developers and content managers. 3. Community Support: Typo3 has a large and active community that provides extensive resources and support, whereas Ghost has a smaller but dedicated community, focusing on enhancing the core features of the platform. 4. Customization Options: Typo3 offers extensive customization options through extensions and plugins, allowing users to tailor the platform to their specific needs, whereas Ghost has limited customization options, with a focus on simplicity and ease of use. 5. Scalability: Typo3 is highly scalable, suitable for large enterprises with complex content management needs, while Ghost is better suited for smaller websites or blogs with less complex requirements. 6. Hosting Requirements: Ghost is designed to run on a managed hosting environment, while Typo3 can be deployed on a wide range of hosting services, providing more flexibility in hosting options.

In Summary, the key differences between Ghost and Typo3 lie in their architecture, user interface, community support, customization options, scalability, and hosting requirements.