Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Ghost vs Umbraco: What are the differences?
Introduction:
When choosing a CMS for your website, it's important to consider the specific features and functionalities that each platform offers. In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between Ghost and Umbraco to help you make an informed decision for your web development needs.
Hosting and Maintenance: Ghost is a fully managed platform, which means that hosting and maintenance are taken care of by the Ghost team. On the other hand, Umbraco is a self-hosted CMS, giving users more control over their hosting environment and maintenance tasks.
Template Customization: Ghost offers a limited number of themes and customization options compared to Umbraco, which provides more flexibility in terms of template customization and design choices.
User Interface: The user interface of Ghost is more focused on content creation and publishing, with a minimalist design that prioritizes writing. Umbraco, on the other hand, offers a more comprehensive interface with a wider range of features for content management and website administration.
Target Audience: Ghost is primarily designed for bloggers, publishers, and content creators who prioritize writing and storytelling. Umbraco, on the other hand, caters to a wider range of users including developers, marketers, and enterprises looking for a versatile and scalable CMS solution.
Scalability and Extensibility: Umbraco is known for its scalability and extensibility, making it a popular choice for large websites and complex projects that require customizations and integrations. Ghost, while suitable for smaller websites and blogs, may have limitations in terms of scalability and extensibility.
Community and Support: Umbraco has a larger and more active community compared to Ghost, which means users can benefit from a wider range of resources, tutorials, and community support. Ghost, on the other hand, has a smaller but dedicated community that focuses on content creation and best practices for blogging.
In Summary, Ghost and Umbraco offer distinct features and functionalities catering to different user preferences and project requirements. Choose Ghost for a managed platform with a focus on content creation, while Umbraco provides more customization options and scalability for larger websites and complex projects.
So many choices for CMSs these days. So then what do you choose if speed, security and customization are key? Headless for one. Consuming your own APIs for content is absolute key. It makes designing pages in the front-end a breeze. Leaving Ghost and Cockpit. If I then looked at the footprint and impact on server load, Cockpit definitely wins that battle.
Pros of Ghost
- Beautiful45
- Fast35
- Quick/simple post styling29
- Live Post Preview20
- Open source20
- Non-profit19
- Seamless writing16
- Node.js6
- Fast and Performatic5
- Javascript5
- Simplest4
- Wonderful UI3
- Handlebars3
- Full Control3
- Magic2
- Clean2
- Headless CMS1
- Self-hostable1