Git-appraise vs Reviewable

Overview

Reviewable

Stacks17

Followers32

Votes23

Git-appraise

Stacks4

Followers27

Votes0

GitHub Stars5.3K

Forks143

Git-appraise vs Reviewable: What are the differences?

Introduction

Git-appraise and Reviewable are two popular tools used for code review in the software development process. Below are the key differences between Git-appraise and Reviewable.

Integration with Git workflow: Git-appraise is tightly integrated with Git, allowing users to easily create, update, and manage code reviews directly from the command line. On the other hand, Reviewable is a web-based code review tool that integrates with GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, providing a more user-friendly interface for code reviews.
Pricing Model: Git-appraise is an open-source tool, meaning it is free to use for all users without any additional costs. In contrast, Reviewable offers both free and paid plans, with additional features and capabilities available in the paid version.
Review Capabilities: Git-appraise primarily focuses on providing a lightweight and efficient code review process within the Git workflow, enabling users to easily track, comment, and approve changes. Conversely, Reviewable offers advanced review capabilities such as inline commenting, side-by-side diffs, and automatic syntax highlighting to enhance the code review experience.
Collaboration Features: Reviewable is known for its robust collaboration features, allowing multiple team members to collaboratively review code, create discussions, and resolve issues in real-time. Git-appraise, while efficient for individual code reviews, lacks some of the advanced collaboration capabilities present in Reviewable.
Performance and Scalability: Reviewable is designed to handle large codebases and complex projects with ease, providing fast and scalable code review functionality. Git-appraise, although efficient for smaller projects, may face performance issues when dealing with larger code repositories and extensive review processes.

In Summary, Git-appraise and Reviewable differ in their integration with Git workflow, pricing model, review capabilities, collaboration features, and performance and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Reviewable	Git-appraise
A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.	This is a distributed code review system for Git. Code reviews are stored inside the repository as git objects that can be pushed and pulled to remote repos. When pulling, updates from the remote are automatically merged by the tool.
See only what changed since last time you looked (even if rebased).;Instantly diff any two revisions of a file, in one or two columns.;Customize code font, syntax highlighting, max line length.;Tracks reviewed files, unreplied / unresolved comments.;Comments map across code changes, never disappear.;Send all comments in one batch, or one at a time.;Open files on the right line directly in your editor.	Code review requests; Continuous integration status; Robot comments (generated by static analysis tool); Review comments (generated by person)
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 5.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 143
Stacks 17	Stacks 4
Followers 32	Followers 27
Votes 23	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Batch commenting 4 Makes me feel organised and in control 4 Easy to use 3 Easy incremental reviewing 3 Efficient comment paging	No community feedback yet
Integrations
GitHub	Git Jenkins Eclipse GitHub Phabricator

What are some alternatives to Reviewable, Git-appraise?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Git-appraise vs Reviewable: What are the differences?

Introduction

Git-appraise and Reviewable are two popular tools used for code review in the software development process. Below are the key differences between Git-appraise and Reviewable.

Integration with Git workflow: Git-appraise is tightly integrated with Git, allowing users to easily create, update, and manage code reviews directly from the command line. On the other hand, Reviewable is a web-based code review tool that integrates with GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, providing a more user-friendly interface for code reviews.
Pricing Model: Git-appraise is an open-source tool, meaning it is free to use for all users without any additional costs. In contrast, Reviewable offers both free and paid plans, with additional features and capabilities available in the paid version.
Review Capabilities: Git-appraise primarily focuses on providing a lightweight and efficient code review process within the Git workflow, enabling users to easily track, comment, and approve changes. Conversely, Reviewable offers advanced review capabilities such as inline commenting, side-by-side diffs, and automatic syntax highlighting to enhance the code review experience.
Collaboration Features: Reviewable is known for its robust collaboration features, allowing multiple team members to collaboratively review code, create discussions, and resolve issues in real-time. Git-appraise, while efficient for individual code reviews, lacks some of the advanced collaboration capabilities present in Reviewable.
Performance and Scalability: Reviewable is designed to handle large codebases and complex projects with ease, providing fast and scalable code review functionality. Git-appraise, although efficient for smaller projects, may face performance issues when dealing with larger code repositories and extensive review processes.

In Summary, Git-appraise and Reviewable differ in their integration with Git workflow, pricing model, review capabilities, collaboration features, and performance and scalability.