StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Version Control System
  5. Git vs Mercurial vs Perforce

Git vs Mercurial vs Perforce

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Git
Git
Stacks343.7K
Followers184.2K
Votes6.6K
GitHub Stars57.1K
Forks26.9K
Mercurial
Mercurial
Stacks229
Followers219
Votes105
Perforce
Perforce
Stacks83
Followers113
Votes9

Git vs Mercurial vs Perforce: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Git, Mercurial, and Perforce

Git, Mercurial, and Perforce are all version control systems that are widely used in software development. Each of these tools has its own unique features and differences that set them apart from one another. Below are the key differences between Git, Mercurial, and Perforce.

1. **Architecture**: Git is a distributed version control system, meaning each developer has a complete copy of the repository on their local machine. Mercurial also follows a distributed model like Git. On the other hand, Perforce operates on a centralized model, where there is a single central repository that all developers interact with.

2. **Branching and Merging**: Git is known for its powerful branching and merging capabilities, making it easier for developers to work on different features concurrently. Mercurial also provides robust support for branching and merging, similar to Git. In contrast, Perforce has a more restrictive branching and merging process compared to Git and Mercurial.

3. **Performance**: Git is known for its speed and performance, especially when handling large repositories. Mercurial also offers good performance, although it may be slightly slower than Git in certain operations. Perforce, on the other hand, may not be as fast as Git and Mercurial, especially when dealing with large binary files.

4. **Workflow**: Git follows a more flexible and decentralized workflow, with the ability to work offline and push changes to remote repositories when needed. Mercurial also supports a similar workflow to Git, allowing developers to work independently and merge changes when necessary. Perforce, being centralized, requires developers to be online and connected to the central server to perform most operations.

5. **Licensing**: Git is an open-source tool, available for free under the GNU General Public License. Mercurial is also open-source and free to use. Perforce, however, is a commercial tool that requires a paid license for extended features and support.

6. **Learning Curve**: Git is known for its steep learning curve, especially for beginners. Mercurial offers a more user-friendly and intuitive interface, making it easier for new users to get started. Perforce, with its centralized setup, may require some time to adapt to for developers used to distributed version control systems like Git and Mercurial.

In Summary, Git and Mercurial are popular distributed version control systems with strong branching and merging capabilities and open-source licensing, while Perforce is a centralized system that may offer better performance with large binary files but comes with a commercial license.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Git
Git
Mercurial
Mercurial
Perforce
Perforce

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

Visibility, access control, workflow and code management for Git environments. Flexibility of collaborating on the same codebase and code reviews using any combination of Perforce and Git workflows and tools without compromise.

--
Version Control; Application Lifecycle Management; Static Code Analysis for C, C++, C#, and Java; Codeless Selenium Test Automation; Open Source Support; Enterprise PHP Development
Statistics
GitHub Stars
57.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
26.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
343.7K
Stacks
229
Stacks
83
Followers
184.2K
Followers
219
Followers
113
Votes
6.6K
Votes
105
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1429
    Distributed version control system
  • 1053
    Efficient branching and merging
  • 959
    Fast
  • 843
    Open source
  • 726
    Better than svn
Cons
  • 16
    Hard to learn
  • 11
    Inconsistent command line interface
  • 9
    Easy to lose uncommitted work
  • 8
    Worst documentation ever possibly made
  • 5
    Awful merge handling
Pros
  • 18
    A lot easier to extend than git
  • 17
    Easy-to-grasp system with nice tools
  • 13
    Works on windows natively without cygwin nonsense
  • 11
    Written in python
  • 9
    Free
Cons
  • 0
    Track single upstream only
  • 0
    Does not distinguish between local and remote head
Pros
  • 3
    Great for Enterprise level use
  • 3
    Powerful
  • 2
    Robust
  • 1
    Scalable
Integrations
No integrations available
Windows
Windows
Fedora
Fedora
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
Debian
Debian
Gentoo Linux
Gentoo Linux
Mac OS X
Mac OS X
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Git, Mercurial, Perforce?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

SVN (Subversion)

SVN (Subversion)

Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana