Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
GitHub Enterprise vs SourceTree: What are the differences?
Key Differences between GitHub Enterprise and SourceTree
Hosting: GitHub Enterprise is a self-hosted version of GitHub, allowing companies to have their own version control system within their infrastructure, while SourceTree is a Git desktop client that helps manage repositories but doesn't provide hosting services.
Cost: GitHub Enterprise requires a paid subscription, and the cost can vary based on the number of users and repositories, whereas SourceTree is free to use for individuals and small teams, making it more cost-effective for small-scale projects.
Features: GitHub Enterprise offers advanced collaboration tools like code review, issue tracking, and project management, making it suitable for large, complex projects with multiple contributors, while SourceTree focuses primarily on providing a user-friendly interface for basic Git operations for individual developers and small teams.
Integration: GitHub Enterprise seamlessly integrates with its cloud services, such as GitHub Actions and GitHub Packages, enhancing automation and CI/CD processes, whereas SourceTree integrates with various Git hosting services but lacks the extensive integration capabilities of GitHub Enterprise.
Security: GitHub Enterprise provides robust security features such as SAML single sign-on, LDAP support, and advanced permission controls, making it suitable for organizations with strict security requirements, whereas SourceTree relies on the security measures implemented by the Git hosting service it is connected to, presenting potential security risks for sensitive projects.
Customization: GitHub Enterprise allows customization through custom branding, integrations with third-party tools, and API access, enabling organizations to tailor the platform to their specific needs, while SourceTree has limited customization options and is more of a standardized Git client tool without many customization capabilities.
In Summary, GitHub Enterprise is a comprehensive, enterprise-grade solution for managing repositories, collaboration, and automation, while SourceTree is a user-friendly desktop client focused on simplifying Git operations for individual developers and small teams.
We are using a Bitbucket server, and due to migration efforts and new Atlassian community license changes, we need to move to a new self-hosted solution. The new data-center license for Atlassian, available in February, will be community provisioned (free). Along with that community license, other technologies will be coming with it (Crucible, Confluence, and Jira). Is there value in a paid-for license to get the GitHub Enterprise? Are the tools that come with it worth the cost?
I know it is about $20 per 10 seats, and we have about 300 users. Have other convertees to Microsoft's tools found it easy to do a migration? Is the toolset that much more beneficial to the free suite that one can get from Atlassian?
So far, free seems to be the winner, and the familiarization with Atlassian implementation and maintenance is understood. Going to GitHub, are there any distinct challenges to be found or any perks to be attained?
These are pretty competitive, and to recommend one over the other would require understanding your usage. Also, what other tools you use: for instance, what do you use for Issue-tracking, or for build pipelines. In your case, since you are already using Bitbucket, the question would be: do you have any current pain-points? And, on the other hand, do you already use Atlassian's JIRA, where you'd benefit from the tight integration? So, though I would not recommend one over the other just in general,. But, if Bitbucket fulfills your current use-cases, then there seems to be little motivation to move.
I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.
It allows * to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie) * it helps to investigate the history * most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.
Pros of GitHub Enterprise
- Expensive - $$$4
- Code security2
- CDCI with Github Actions2
- Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available1
- Draft Pull Request1
- User experience0
Pros of SourceTree
- Visual history and branch view205
- Beautiful UI164
- Easy repository browsing134
- Gitflow support87
- Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines75
- Great branch visualization22
- Ui/ux and user-friendliness18
- Best Git Client UI/Features8
- Search commit messages7
- Available for Windows and macOS5
- Log only one file1
- Search file content1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of GitHub Enterprise
- $$$2
Cons of SourceTree
- Crashes often12
- So many bugs8
- Fetching is slow sometimes7
- No dark theme (Windows)5
- Extremely slow5
- Very unstable5
- Can't select text in diff (windows)4
- Freezes quite frequently3
- Can't scale window from top corners3
- UI blinking2
- Windows version worse than mac version2
- Installs to AppData folder (windows)2
- Diff makes tab indentation look like spaces2
- Windows and Mac versions are very different2
- Diff appears as if space indented even if its tabs2
- Doesn't have an option for git init2
- Useless for merge conflict resolution2
- Doesn't differentiate submodules from parent repos2
- Requires bitbucket account2
- Generally hard to like1
- No reflog support1
- Bases binary check on filesize1
- Can't add remotes by right clicking remotes (windows)1
