GitHub Enterprise vs SourceTree

Overview

SourceTree

Stacks10.6K

Followers8.1K

Votes727

GitHub Enterprise

Stacks500

Followers627

Votes10

GitHub Enterprise vs SourceTree: What are the differences?

Key Differences between GitHub Enterprise and SourceTree

Hosting: GitHub Enterprise is a self-hosted version of GitHub, allowing companies to have their own version control system within their infrastructure, while SourceTree is a Git desktop client that helps manage repositories but doesn't provide hosting services.
Cost: GitHub Enterprise requires a paid subscription, and the cost can vary based on the number of users and repositories, whereas SourceTree is free to use for individuals and small teams, making it more cost-effective for small-scale projects.
Features: GitHub Enterprise offers advanced collaboration tools like code review, issue tracking, and project management, making it suitable for large, complex projects with multiple contributors, while SourceTree focuses primarily on providing a user-friendly interface for basic Git operations for individual developers and small teams.
Integration: GitHub Enterprise seamlessly integrates with its cloud services, such as GitHub Actions and GitHub Packages, enhancing automation and CI/CD processes, whereas SourceTree integrates with various Git hosting services but lacks the extensive integration capabilities of GitHub Enterprise.
Security: GitHub Enterprise provides robust security features such as SAML single sign-on, LDAP support, and advanced permission controls, making it suitable for organizations with strict security requirements, whereas SourceTree relies on the security measures implemented by the Git hosting service it is connected to, presenting potential security risks for sensitive projects.
Customization: GitHub Enterprise allows customization through custom branding, integrations with third-party tools, and API access, enabling organizations to tailor the platform to their specific needs, while SourceTree has limited customization options and is more of a standardized Git client tool without many customization capabilities.

In Summary, GitHub Enterprise is a comprehensive, enterprise-grade solution for managing repositories, collaboration, and automation, while SourceTree is a user-friendly desktop client focused on simplifying Git operations for individual developers and small teams.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on SourceTree, GitHub Enterprise

Eric

DevOps at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Dec 15, 2020

Needs adviceon

Bitbucket

Crucible

Confluence

We are using a Bitbucket server, and due to migration efforts and new Atlassian community license changes, we need to move to a new self-hosted solution. The new data-center license for Atlassian, available in February, will be community provisioned (free). Along with that community license, other technologies will be coming with it (Crucible, Confluence, and Jira). Is there value in a paid-for license to get the GitHub Enterprise? Are the tools that come with it worth the cost?

I know it is about $20 per 10 seats, and we have about 300 users. Have other convertees to Microsoft's tools found it easy to do a migration? Is the toolset that much more beneficial to the free suite that one can get from Atlassian?

So far, free seems to be the winner, and the familiarization with Atlassian implementation and maintenance is understood. Going to GitHub, are there any distinct challenges to be found or any perks to be attained?

549k views549k

Comments

Darius

Dec 19, 2020

Review

These are pretty competitive, and to recommend one over the other would require understanding your usage. Also, what other tools you use: for instance, what do you use for Issue-tracking, or for build pipelines. In your case, since you are already using Bitbucket, the question would be: do you have any current pain-points? And, on the other hand, do you already use Atlassian's JIRA, where you'd benefit from the tight integration? So, though I would not recommend one over the other just in general,. But, if Bitbucket fulfills your current use-cases, then there seems to be little motivation to move.

317k views317k

Comments

Stefan

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.

It allows

to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie)
it helps to investigate the history
most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

SourceTree	GitHub Enterprise
Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.	GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.
Full-powered DVCS;Create, clone, commit, push, pull, merge, and more are all just a click away.;Review your outgoing and incoming changesets, cherry-pick between branches, patch handling, rebase, stash, shelve, and much more.;Use Git-flow and Hg-flow with ease. Keep your repositories cleaner and your development more efficient with SourceTree's intuitive interface to Git and Hg's 'branchy' development model.	Compliance and auditing;Hundreds of integrations;Flexible deployment;Centralized permissions;Powerful dashboards;Technical support
Statistics
Stacks 10.6K	Stacks 500
Followers 8.1K	Followers 627
Votes 727	Votes 10
Pros & Cons
Pros 205 Visual history and branch view 164 Beautiful UI 134 Easy repository browsing 87 Gitflow support 75 Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines Cons 12 Crashes often 8 So many bugs 7 Fetching is slow sometimes 5 Extremely slow 5 No dark theme (Windows)	Pros 4 Expensive - $$$ 2 Code security 2 CDCI with Github Actions 1 Draft Pull Request 1 Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available Cons 2 $$$
Integrations
GitHub Git Bitbucket Windows macOS Mercurial	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to SourceTree, GitHub Enterprise?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

GitKraken

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Related Comparisons

GitHub Enterprise vs SourceTree: What are the differences?

Key Differences between GitHub Enterprise and SourceTree

Hosting: GitHub Enterprise is a self-hosted version of GitHub, allowing companies to have their own version control system within their infrastructure, while SourceTree is a Git desktop client that helps manage repositories but doesn't provide hosting services.
Cost: GitHub Enterprise requires a paid subscription, and the cost can vary based on the number of users and repositories, whereas SourceTree is free to use for individuals and small teams, making it more cost-effective for small-scale projects.
Features: GitHub Enterprise offers advanced collaboration tools like code review, issue tracking, and project management, making it suitable for large, complex projects with multiple contributors, while SourceTree focuses primarily on providing a user-friendly interface for basic Git operations for individual developers and small teams.
Integration: GitHub Enterprise seamlessly integrates with its cloud services, such as GitHub Actions and GitHub Packages, enhancing automation and CI/CD processes, whereas SourceTree integrates with various Git hosting services but lacks the extensive integration capabilities of GitHub Enterprise.
Security: GitHub Enterprise provides robust security features such as SAML single sign-on, LDAP support, and advanced permission controls, making it suitable for organizations with strict security requirements, whereas SourceTree relies on the security measures implemented by the Git hosting service it is connected to, presenting potential security risks for sensitive projects.
Customization: GitHub Enterprise allows customization through custom branding, integrations with third-party tools, and API access, enabling organizations to tailor the platform to their specific needs, while SourceTree has limited customization options and is more of a standardized Git client tool without many customization capabilities.

GitHub Enterprise vs SourceTree

Overview

GitHub Enterprise vs SourceTree: What are the differences?