StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Analytics
  4. Programming And Code Analytics
  5. GitHub Enterprise vs WakaTime

GitHub Enterprise vs WakaTime

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

WakaTime
WakaTime
Stacks156
Followers158
Votes52
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Stacks500
Followers627
Votes10

GitHub Enterprise vs WakaTime: What are the differences?

## Introduction 

GitHub Enterprise and WakaTime are two tools commonly used in the software development industry. Here are the key differences between GitHub Enterprise and WakaTime:

1. **Integration Scope**: GitHub Enterprise primarily focuses on code management, version control, and collaboration among developers within a private, secure environment. In contrast, WakaTime is a time tracking tool that integrates with various Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) to provide insights on how developers spend their time coding, giving a detailed view of productivity and focus.

2. **Collaboration vs. Productivity**: While GitHub Enterprise emphasizes team collaboration through features like pull requests, code reviews, and issue tracking, WakaTime aims to enhance individual productivity by tracking coding activity, analyzing habits, and providing metrics that help users understand their workflow and optimize time management.

3. **Client Usage**: GitHub Enterprise is primarily used by development teams within organizations that require a scalable, self-hosted solution for secure code management, whereas WakaTime is more commonly used by individual developers or freelancers seeking to understand their coding habits and improve productivity on a personal level.

4. **Data Insights**: GitHub Enterprise provides detailed insights into team performance, project health, and code quality through features like GitHub Actions, GitHub Insights, and repository analytics. On the other hand, WakaTime offers personal metrics such as coding hours, daily goals, programming languages used, and project allocation to help developers track their progress and make informed decisions.

5. **Security and Compliance**: GitHub Enterprise ensures data security, compliance, and access control through features like protected branches, organization-level permissions, and self-hosted infrastructure, making it suitable for enterprises with strict security requirements. WakaTime, while focused on individual productivity, also maintains data privacy and security by allowing users to control the sharing of their coding activity and metrics.

6. **Scalability and Pricing**: GitHub Enterprise offers scalable solutions for large organizations with pricing based on the number of users and features required, making it ideal for enterprise-level deployments. In contrast, WakaTime provides affordable pricing plans tailored to individual developers or small teams, offering flexibility and cost-effectiveness for users looking to enhance their productivity without the need for enterprise-scale features. 

In Summary, GitHub Enterprise is geared towards team collaboration and secure code management, whereas WakaTime focuses on individual productivity tracking and insights for developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

WakaTime
WakaTime
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise

Quantify your coding - open source plugins for automatic time tracking & insights into your programming.

GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.

Fully automatic, with reports via email;Find the time you spend per feature/commit;See time spent in each language;Branch-level stats; File-level stats;Slack integration for team collaboration
Compliance and auditing;Hundreds of integrations;Flexible deployment;Centralized permissions;Powerful dashboards;Technical support
Statistics
Stacks
156
Stacks
500
Followers
158
Followers
627
Votes
52
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    Automatic time tracking per project
  • 12
    It's a great way to manage my time
  • 8
    Time log next to each commit on GitHub
  • 5
    Productivity
  • 5
    Big choice of supported IDEs
Cons
  • 1
    Slow down the IDE
Pros
  • 4
    Expensive - $$$
  • 2
    CDCI with Github Actions
  • 2
    Code security
  • 1
    Draft Pull Request
  • 1
    Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available
Cons
  • 2
    $$$
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Slack
Slack
Eclipse
Eclipse
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Vim
Vim
GitLab
GitLab
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Atom
Atom
NetBeans IDE
NetBeans IDE
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to WakaTime, GitHub Enterprise?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana