Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
GitKraken vs Mercurial: What are the differences?
Introduction
This Markdown provides a comparison of the key differences between GitKraken and Mercurial.
User Interface: GitKraken offers an intuitive and visually appealing user interface that simplifies navigating through repositories and visualizing branch relationships. On the other hand, Mercurial provides a simple command-line interface, which may require advanced knowledge for efficient usage.
Branching Model: GitKraken follows the Git branching model, which allows for multiple branches and supports advanced features like rebasing. Mercurial, on the other hand, follows a simpler and more linear branching model, lacking some of the advanced branching capabilities provided by Git.
Hosting Platforms: GitKraken natively supports popular hosting platforms like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket. It provides seamless integration with these platforms, facilitating repository management and collaboration. Mercurial, however, has less widespread popularity, and its integration with hosting platforms may require additional configuration or third-party tools.
Performance: GitKraken is known for its efficient performance, allowing for faster repository operations due to optimizations in its handling of Git repositories. Mercurial, while still performant, may have slightly slower operations in comparison, especially when dealing with large repositories.
Learning Curve: GitKraken offers a user-friendly interface and provides a smoother learning curve for those new to version control systems, particularly those with limited command-line experience. Mercurial, although straightforward, may require a steeper learning curve as it relies heavily on command-line usage.
Community Support: GitKraken benefits from its large and active community, offering a wealth of support resources like forums, knowledge bases, and video tutorials. Mercurial, while having an active community as well, may have fewer resources available and a comparatively smaller user base.
In Summary, GitKraken provides a visually appealing user interface, seamlessly integrates with popular hosting platforms, and has a more intuitive learning curve compared to the command-line-based Mercurial. Additionally, GitKraken supports advanced branching features and exhibits better performance with larger repositories. However, Mercurial still holds its ground as a simpler alternative with an active community base.
Pros of GitKraken
- Dark theme59
- Best linux git client34
- Great overview29
- Full featured client21
- Gitflow support20
- Beautiful UI19
- Very easy to use18
- Graph16
- Works great on both linux and windows13
- Effortless13
- Easy Merge Conflict Tool6
- Amazing Github and Bitbucket integration5
- Great UX4
- Integration with GitHub3
- Automatic Repo Discovery3
- Submodule support3
- Easy to Learn and Setup3
- Super fast3
- Fuzzy find (CTRL P)2
- Very user friendly1
- Much more stable than source tree1
- Great for non-dev users1
- Because it has Linux client1
- Command palette (CTRL Shift P)1
Pros of Mercurial
- A lot easier to extend than git18
- Easy-to-grasp system with nice tools17
- Works on windows natively without cygwin nonsense13
- Written in python11
- Free9
- Fast8
- Better than Git6
- Best GUI6
- Better than svn4
- Hg inc2
- Good user experience2
- TortoiseHg - Unified free gui for all platforms2
- Consistent UI2
- Easy-to-use2
- Native support to all platforms2
- Free to use1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of GitKraken
- Extremely slow when working with large repositories3
- No edit/fixup in interactive rebase3
- Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree)3
- Not as many features as sourcetree2
- Do not allow to directly edit staging area2
- Does not work like a Mac app2
Cons of Mercurial
- Track single upstream only0
- Does not distinguish between local and remote head0