StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Docker Registry
  5. GitLab vs Quay.io

GitLab vs Quay.io

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Quay.io
Quay.io
Stacks64
Followers86
Votes7
GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

GitLab vs Quay.io: What are the differences?

GitLab and Quay.io are two popular platforms used for version control and container registry respectively. While both serve a similar purpose, there are several key differences between GitLab and Quay.io that make them unique and suitable for different use cases.
  1. Integration with CI/CD: GitLab is a comprehensive DevOps platform that offers built-in continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) capabilities. It allows developers to automate the development lifecycle, from code versioning to deployment. On the other hand, Quay.io focuses solely on container registry management and does not provide native CI/CD integration.

  2. Built-in Repository Management: GitLab offers a complete repository management system, providing features like issue tracking, merge requests, and code reviews. It enables seamless collaboration among team members, making it easier to manage and track changes in the codebase. Quay.io, being focused on container registry, does not offer these repository management features.

  3. Scalability and Performance: GitLab is designed to handle large-scale projects and can support a high number of concurrent users. It provides features like load balancing, clustering, and horizontal scaling to ensure optimal performance. Quay.io, while capable of handling container images at scale, does not offer the same level of scalability and performance optimizations as GitLab.

  4. Private Repository Pricing: GitLab offers free unlimited private repositories, making it an attractive choice for organizations that require confidentiality and security for their code. Quay.io, on the other hand, has a tiered pricing model that may incur additional costs for hosting private repositories.

  5. Container Registry Features: Quay.io focuses primarily on container registry management and provides advanced features like vulnerability scanning, image promotion, mirroring, and content trust. These features are specifically tailored for containerized applications and are not available in GitLab's container registry.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: GitLab has a larger and more active community compared to Quay.io. This results in a wider range of resources, documentation, and community support for developers. GitLab also has a thriving ecosystem of integrations with other tools for seamless workflow integration. Quay.io, being more specialized in the container registry domain, has a smaller community and ecosystem.

In summary, GitLab is a comprehensive DevOps platform that offers built-in CI/CD, repository management, and scalability features, making it suitable for large-scale projects. On the other hand, Quay.io is a focused container registry platform with advanced container-specific features like vulnerability scanning and image promotion, making it a preferred choice for containerized applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Quay.io, GitLab

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Quay.io
Quay.io
GitLab
GitLab

Simply upload your Dockerfile (and any additional files it needs) and we'll build your Dockerfile into an image and push it to your repository.

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Secure - Your data is transferred using SSL at all times and encrypted when at rest. More information available in our security guide;Shareable - Have to share a repository? No problem! Share with anyone you choose;Cloud Hosted - Accessible from anywhere, anytime
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
64
Stacks
63.4K
Followers
86
Followers
54.5K
Votes
7
Votes
2.5K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Great UI
  • 1
    API
  • 0
    Docker cloud repositories are public by default. Bad
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Integrations
Docker
Docker
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Quay.io, GitLab?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana