Overview

GitLab

Stacks63.4K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

TortoiseSVN

Stacks53

Followers117

Votes3

GitHub Stars43

Forks30

GitLab vs TortoiseSVN: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitLab and TortoiseSVN are both version control systems used for managing and tracking changes in software development projects. However, they have key differences that set them apart.

Integration with different platforms: GitLab is a web-based platform that provides a complete DevOps lifecycle management solution, including code hosting, project management, CI/CD, and more. On the other hand, TortoiseSVN is primarily a Windows client for Subversion (SVN) that integrates with Windows Explorer for file operations. While GitLab is platform-agnostic, TortoiseSVN is limited to Windows-based systems.
Distributed vs. centralized: GitLab uses a distributed version control system (DVCS), which means that every user has a complete copy of the repository locally. This allows for better offline work, faster branching, and merging. In contrast, TortoiseSVN is based on a centralized version control system (CVCS), where there is a central repository and users need to be connected to it for most operations. This can be limiting in terms of flexibility and collaboration.
Branching and merging: GitLab offers robust branching and merging capabilities with features like merge requests, conflict resolution, and branch protection rules. It allows for parallel development of multiple features or bug fixes and easy integration of changes into the main codebase. TortoiseSVN also supports branching and merging, but the process is more complex and less intuitive compared to GitLab.
Community and collaboration: GitLab has a strong open-source community and a large user base, making it easier to find support, documentation, and additional resources. It encourages collaboration and provides features like code review, issue tracking, and project management tools. TortoiseSVN, although widely used, has a smaller community and fewer collaborative features.
Continuous Integration and Deployment: GitLab provides integrated CI/CD pipelines, allowing for automated testing, building, and deployment of software projects. It includes a GitLab Runner for executing jobs on remote machines. TortoiseSVN does not have built-in CI/CD capabilities and would require additional tools or plugins to achieve similar functionality.
License and Cost: GitLab offers a free and open-source Community Edition, as well as a paid Enterprise Edition with additional features and support. TortoiseSVN, being an open-source Windows client for Subversion, is free to use without any added cost.

In Summary, GitLab is a web-based, distributed version control system with extensive features for collaboration and CI/CD, while TortoiseSVN is a Windows client for Subversion, primarily used in centralized version control systems. GitLab has a larger community, more versatile branching and merging capabilities, integrated CI/CD support, while TortoiseSVN is limited to Windows platforms and lacks some advanced collaborative features.

🔥 Trending in Code Collaboration on StackShare

Glide

Code Collaboration

AI-assisted technical design docs

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

8

Advice on GitLab, TortoiseSVN

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab	TortoiseSVN
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.	It is an Apache™ Subversion (SVN)® client, implemented as a Windows shell extension. It's intuitive and easy to use, since it doesn't require the Subversion command line client to run. And it is free to use, even in a commercial environment.
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails	Easy to use. all commands are available directly from the Windows Explorer;Powerful commit dialog. integrated spell checker for log messages;Per project settings;Integration with issue tracking systems; Helpful Tools;Available in many languages
Statistics
GitHub Stars 0	GitHub Stars 43
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks 30
Stacks 63.4K	Stacks 53
Followers 54.5K	Followers 117
Votes 2.5K	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature	Pros 3 Easy to use
Integrations
No integrations available	Windows Visual Studio Code

What are some alternatives to GitLab, TortoiseSVN?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.