StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Realtime Backend API
  5. GoInstant vs SocketCluster

GoInstant vs SocketCluster

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GoInstant
GoInstant
Stacks0
Followers3
Votes14
SocketCluster
SocketCluster
Stacks47
Followers168
Votes47
GitHub Stars6.2K
Forks322

GoInstant vs SocketCluster: What are the differences?

### GoInstant vs. SocketCluster

GoInstant and SocketCluster are both real-time communication platforms that offer unique features for developers. Below are the key differences between GoInstant and SocketCluster:

1. **Architecture**: GoInstant utilizes a centralized architecture where the server is responsible for managing all real-time communications, while SocketCluster uses a distributed architecture where each node in the cluster can handle real-time events independently, offering better scalability and fault tolerance.

2. **Scalability**: SocketCluster is designed to scale horizontally by adding more nodes to the cluster, making it suitable for high traffic applications. In contrast, GoInstant may face scalability limitations due to its centralized nature.

3. **Ease of Use**: GoInstant is known for its simplicity and ease of integration, making it a great choice for developers looking to quickly add real-time features to their applications. SocketCluster, on the other hand, provides more flexibility and customization options, which can be advantageous for complex projects.

4. **Community Support**: SocketCluster has a larger and more active community compared to GoInstant, leading to more resources, plugins, and support available for developers using the platform.

5. **Performance**: SocketCluster is known for its high performance due to its use of WebSockets and the ability to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently. GoInstant may not be as optimized for performance in comparison.

6. **Customization**: SocketCluster offers more customization options and control over low-level features, allowing developers to fine-tune their real-time applications for specific requirements. GoInstant, while user-friendly, may have limitations in terms of customization capabilities.

In Summary, GoInstant and SocketCluster differ in architecture, scalability, ease of use, community support, performance, and customization options, catering to different needs and preferences of developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GoInstant
GoInstant
SocketCluster
SocketCluster

It is a service for building web and mobile realtime apps easily. Simply add its library to your application to gain access to shared data storage, pub/sub messaging and more.

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

Shared data storage; Pub/sub messaging; REST API; Client-side widgets; Angular integration (GoAngular)
Resilient on both the client and backend - Process crashes, lost connections and other failures are handled seamlessly.;Scales linearly as you add more CPU cores and workers (assuming a decent OS) - Tested with up to 16 cores.;Also designed to scale horizontally across multiple machines. See sc-redis sample.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
6.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
322
Stacks
0
Stacks
47
Followers
3
Followers
168
Votes
14
Votes
47
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to integrate
  • 4
    Client side only applications without server hassle
  • 2
    Great documentation
  • 1
    Quick and simple storage with realtime sync
  • 1
    Heroku Add-on
Pros
  • 12
    Cluster mode is awesome
  • 8
    WebSockets
  • 7
    Scalability
  • 4
    Real-time
  • 4
    JWT based Authentication
Integrations
Postman
Postman
GitHub
GitHub
Rekognition API
Rekognition API
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to GoInstant, SocketCluster?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

deepstream.io

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

8base

8base

A cloud service designed to power enterprise-grade web and mobile applications that require support for large numbers of users, complex data and transactional requirements, comprehensive role-based security and a modern look-and-feel.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase