Google App Maker vs Open Lowcode

Overview

Google App Maker

Stacks177

Followers237

Votes0

Open Lowcode

Stacks3

Followers24

Votes0

GitHub Stars211

Forks28

Google App Maker vs Open Lowcode: What are the differences?

Deployment Options: Google App Maker provides cloud-based deployment options through Google Cloud Platform, while Open Lowcode allows deployment on-premise, in the cloud, or in a hybrid environment, providing more flexibility to the users.
Customization Flexibility: Google App Maker has limited customization options compared to Open Lowcode, which offers extensive customization capabilities through open-source code and customizable modules, enabling users to tailor applications to their specific needs more effectively.
Support for Different Databases: Google App Maker is primarily designed to work with Google Cloud SQL, while Open Lowcode supports a wide range of databases like MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite, giving users more choices in terms of database integration.
Licensing Model: Google App Maker follows a subscription-based pricing model as part of G Suite Business, contrasting with Open Lowcode, which is available as open-source software, allowing users to use and modify the platform freely without any licensing fees.
Learning Curve: Google App Maker is more user-friendly and has a shorter learning curve compared to Open Lowcode, which requires programming knowledge for advanced customization and development, making it more suitable for experienced developers.
Community Support: Open Lowcode has a dedicated community of developers and users contributing to its development and providing support, while Google App Maker lacks a similar level of community support, limiting resources for troubleshooting and knowledge-sharing.

In Summary, Google App Maker and Open Lowcode differ in deployment options, customization flexibility, database support, licensing model, learning curve, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google App Maker	Open Lowcode
App Maker lets you develop powerful apps with relative ease. Create a model to manage your data, build a UI in the visual editor, use Apps Script to write some scripts, and you're on your way.	It allows organizations develop quickly specific applications, and scale them with a minimum budget.
-	95% of your application built assembling existing bricks; Accessible to digital citizens. You do not need a developer to start; No infrastructure required. Just run the prototype on your PC; Full freedom for your developers to create the crucial power features; Add quickly access control, reports, workflows, import / export; Full open-source. Never be a captive customer again
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 211
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 28
Stacks 177	Stacks 3
Followers 237	Followers 24
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
G Suite Google Cloud SQL	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Google App Maker, Open Lowcode?

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Stamplay

The API-based development platform enabling developers to do 80% of the job in 1% of the time thanks to: out of the box APIs for users and data, one-click integration with any API, scalable infrastructure and SDKs. Build Rome in a day.

Kumologica

It is the first low-code development solution that run your integration and automation services serverlessly on any cloud. It provides drag and drop visual designer and low code approach to ensure the greatest speed and flexibility to support a wide range of integrations compatible with most of the platforms and cloud providers.

Backand

Backand is a powerful backend-as-a-service for AngularJS that provides out-of-the-box social login, push notifications, Ionic integration and much more.

Stacker

Stacker lets you turn your spreadsheets into applications. You plug in your Airtable or Google Sheets and Stacker automatically generates you app with login, forms and buttons. Stacker includes built in permissions, UI and business logic.

Magic xpa

It enables rapid creation of cross-platform business applications for desktop, web and mobile, so you can take advantage of new business opportunities quickly and on-demand.

Knack

Build simple web apps like a member directory, job listings, employee time tracking, business directory, contact directory, product catalogue, or equipment tracker.

Mavo

Mavo helps you turn your static HTML into reactive web applications without a single line of programming code.

iLeap

ILeap is a low-code app development platform to build custom apps and automate workflows visually, helping you speed up digital transformation.

Retool

Retool is the fast way to build internal tools. Drag-and-drop our building blocks and connect them to your databases and APIs to build your own tools, instantly. Built by developers, for developers. Trusted by startups and Fortune 500s.

Related Comparisons

Google App Maker vs Open Lowcode: What are the differences?

Deployment Options: Google App Maker provides cloud-based deployment options through Google Cloud Platform, while Open Lowcode allows deployment on-premise, in the cloud, or in a hybrid environment, providing more flexibility to the users.
Customization Flexibility: Google App Maker has limited customization options compared to Open Lowcode, which offers extensive customization capabilities through open-source code and customizable modules, enabling users to tailor applications to their specific needs more effectively.
Support for Different Databases: Google App Maker is primarily designed to work with Google Cloud SQL, while Open Lowcode supports a wide range of databases like MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite, giving users more choices in terms of database integration.
Licensing Model: Google App Maker follows a subscription-based pricing model as part of G Suite Business, contrasting with Open Lowcode, which is available as open-source software, allowing users to use and modify the platform freely without any licensing fees.
Learning Curve: Google App Maker is more user-friendly and has a shorter learning curve compared to Open Lowcode, which requires programming knowledge for advanced customization and development, making it more suitable for experienced developers.
Community Support: Open Lowcode has a dedicated community of developers and users contributing to its development and providing support, while Google App Maker lacks a similar level of community support, limiting resources for troubleshooting and knowledge-sharing.

In Summary, Google App Maker and Open Lowcode differ in deployment options, customization flexibility, database support, licensing model, learning curve, and community support.

Google App Maker vs Open Lowcode

Overview