Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Google BigQuery vs Google Cloud SQL: What are the differences?
Introduction: Google BigQuery and Google Cloud SQL are both cloud-based database services offered by Google Cloud Platform. While they both provide managed database solutions, they have several key differences in terms of functionality and use cases.
Scalability Google BigQuery is designed for large-scale data analytics and can handle massive datasets efficiently. It is a serverless data warehouse that allows for seamlessly scaling compute and storage resources as needed. On the other hand, Google Cloud SQL is a fully managed relational database service that is more suitable for smaller workloads and traditional database applications. It operates as a traditional SQL database, offering horizontal autoscaling for read-intensive workloads, but vertical scaling is limited.
Data Structure BigQuery uses a columnar storage format, which is optimized for querying and analyzing structured and semi-structured data. It can handle nested and repeated fields, making it suitable for handling complex data models. In contrast, Cloud SQL is based on traditional SQL databases like MySQL and PostgreSQL, which are designed for structured data with predefined schemas.
Query Language BigQuery uses its own query language called BigQuery SQL, which is similar to standard SQL but also includes extensions for handling nested and repeated fields. It supports advanced analytics functions and can execute complex queries efficiently. On the other hand, Cloud SQL supports standard SQL for querying, as it is based on traditional SQL databases.
Pricing Model BigQuery pricing is based on a combination of storage and query execution costs. It charges for the amount of data you store in tables and the amount of data processed by queries. The pricing is optimized for analytical workloads, where storing and querying large datasets is more common. In contrast, Cloud SQL pricing is primarily based on the size of the database instance and additional costs for storage and network egress.
Availability and Durability BigQuery offers high availability and durably stores data across multiple locations, with built-in replication and backup features. It automatically handles infrastructure failures and ensures data durability. Cloud SQL also provides high availability with automatic failover, but the durability relies on the underlying storage system, which might vary depending on the database engine used.
Use Cases BigQuery is well-suited for organizations that need to process and analyze large datasets for business intelligence, data warehousing, and machine learning purposes. It is commonly used for ad hoc analytics, data exploration, and running complex analytical queries on massive datasets. Cloud SQL, on the other hand, is more suitable for traditional database applications, such as web applications, content management systems, and e-commerce platforms, where structured data and transactional processing are the primary focus.
Summary: In summary, Google BigQuery is a serverless data warehouse optimized for large-scale data analytics, while Google Cloud SQL is a managed relational database service designed for smaller workloads and traditional database applications. BigQuery is ideal for processing massive datasets and running complex analytical queries, while Cloud SQL is more suitable for structured data and transactional processing.
Cloud Data-warehouse is the centerpiece of modern Data platform. The choice of the most suitable solution is therefore fundamental.
Our benchmark was conducted over BigQuery and Snowflake. These solutions seem to match our goals but they have very different approaches.
BigQuery is notably the only 100% serverless cloud data-warehouse, which requires absolutely NO maintenance: no re-clustering, no compression, no index optimization, no storage management, no performance management. Snowflake requires to set up (paid) reclustering processes, to manage the performance allocated to each profile, etc. We can also mention Redshift, which we have eliminated because this technology requires even more ops operation.
BigQuery can therefore be set up with almost zero cost of human resources. Its on-demand pricing is particularly adapted to small workloads. 0 cost when the solution is not used, only pay for the query you're running. But quickly the use of slots (with monthly or per-minute commitment) will drastically reduce the cost of use. We've reduced by 10 the cost of our nightly batches by using flex slots.
Finally, a major advantage of BigQuery is its almost perfect integration with Google Cloud Platform services: Cloud functions, Dataflow, Data Studio, etc.
BigQuery is still evolving very quickly. The next milestone, BigQuery Omni, will allow to run queries over data stored in an external Cloud platform (Amazon S3 for example). It will be a major breakthrough in the history of cloud data-warehouses. Omni will compensate a weakness of BigQuery: transferring data in near real time from S3 to BQ is not easy today. It was even simpler to implement via Snowflake's Snowpipe solution.
We also plan to use the Machine Learning features built into BigQuery to accelerate our deployment of Data-Science-based projects. An opportunity only offered by the BigQuery solution
Pros of Google BigQuery
- High Performance28
- Easy to use25
- Fully managed service22
- Cheap Pricing19
- Process hundreds of GB in seconds16
- Big Data12
- Full table scans in seconds, no indexes needed11
- Always on, no per-hour costs8
- Good combination with fluentd6
- Machine learning4
- Easy to manage1
- Easy to learn0
Pros of Google Cloud SQL
- Fully managed13
- Backed by Google10
- SQL10
- Flexible4
- Encryption at rest and transit3
- Automatic Software Patching3
- Replication across multiple zone by default3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Google BigQuery
- You can't unit test changes in BQ data1
- Sdas0