StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Google Cloud Pub/Sub vs NSQ

Google Cloud Pub/Sub vs NSQ

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NSQ
NSQ
Stacks142
Followers356
Votes148
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Stacks550
Followers428
Votes13

Google Cloud Pub/Sub vs NSQ: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Scalability: Google Cloud Pub/Sub is designed to handle massive scale, supporting millions of messages per second, while NSQ is limited to a smaller scale, making it suitable for moderate-sized projects.
  2. Managed Service vs Self-hosted: Google Cloud Pub/Sub is a fully managed service provided by Google Cloud, taking care of infrastructure and maintenance, whereas NSQ requires self-hosting and management, giving more control but requiring additional effort.
  3. Global Availability: Google Cloud Pub/Sub is available in multiple regions worldwide, enabling data processing closer to users, while NSQ deployments are typically limited to specific data centers or regions.
  4. Integration with Cloud Services: Google Cloud Pub/Sub seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services like BigQuery, Dataflow, and more, facilitating a streamlined cloud ecosystem, whereas NSQ may require additional configurations for such integrations.
  5. Feature Set: Google Cloud Pub/Sub offers advanced features like message ordering, dead lettering, event notifications, and more, providing a robust messaging solution, while NSQ offers a simpler feature set focused on basic messaging functionalities.
  6. Pricing Model: Google Cloud Pub/Sub follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on the volume of messages and data transferred, offering flexibility for different usage patterns, whereas NSQ may involve more upfront costs for self-hosting and maintaining infrastructure.
In Summary, Google Cloud Pub/Sub and NSQ differ in terms of scalability, managed service availability, global reach, integration with cloud services, feature set, and pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

NSQ
NSQ
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Cloud Pub/Sub is a fully-managed real-time messaging service that allows you to send and receive messages between independent applications. You can leverage Cloud Pub/Sub’s flexibility to decouple systems and components hosted on Google Cloud Platform or elsewhere on the Internet.

support distributed topologies with no SPOF;horizontally scalable (no brokers, seamlessly add more nodes to the cluster);low-latency push based message delivery (performance);combination load-balanced and multicast style message routing;excel at both streaming (high-throughput) and job oriented (low-throughput) workloads;primarily in-memory (beyond a high-water mark messages are transparently kept on disk);runtime discovery service for consumers to find producers (nsqlookupd);transport layer security (TLS);data format agnostic;few dependencies (easy to deploy) and a sane, bounded, default configuration;simple TCP protocol supporting client libraries in any language;HTTP interface for stats, admin actions, and producers (no client library needed to publish);integrates with statsd for realtime instrumentation;robust cluster administration interface (nsqadmin)
-
Statistics
Stacks
142
Stacks
550
Followers
356
Followers
428
Votes
148
Votes
13
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 29
    It's in golang
  • 20
    Lightweight
  • 20
    Distributed
  • 18
    Easy setup
  • 17
    High throughput
Cons
  • 1
    HA
  • 1
    Long term persistence
  • 1
    Get NSQ behavior out of Kafka but not inverse
Pros
  • 9
    Easy to set-up and start with
  • 2
    Efficient and practical for complex systems
  • 2
    A great choice for microservice architecture
Cons
  • 2
    Need integration with stackdriver for monitoring
Integrations
No integrations available
Google Cloud Functions
Google Cloud Functions
Cloud Functions for Firebase
Cloud Functions for Firebase

What are some alternatives to NSQ, Google Cloud Pub/Sub?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase