Overview

Perforce

Stacks83

Followers113

Votes9

Google Cloud Source Repositories

Stacks91

Followers160

Votes0

Google Cloud Source Repositories vs Perforce: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Integration with Google Cloud Platform: Google Cloud Source Repositories seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services, allowing for easy access to additional cloud-based functionalities. On the other hand, Perforce does not provide the same level of integration with cloud platforms, making it less convenient for users who rely heavily on cloud services.
Licensing Model: Perforce operates on a traditional licensing model where users need to purchase licenses for individual users or seats. In contrast, Google Cloud Source Repositories typically follow a pay-as-you-go pricing model, making it more cost-effective for smaller teams or projects with fluctuating user numbers.
Collaboration Features: Google Cloud Source Repositories offer collaboration features such as easy sharing of repositories with project team members and integration with permission management tools. Perforce, while providing collaboration capabilities, may require additional setup and configuration for effective team collaboration.
Version Control System: Google Cloud Source Repositories utilize Git as the primary version control system, which is widely used and familiar to many developers. Perforce, on the other hand, uses its own proprietary version control system called Helix Core, which may require users to learn new commands and workflows.
Scalability and Performance: Google Cloud Source Repositories are designed to scale with the user's needs, offering robust performance even with a large number of users and repositories. Perforce, while scalable, may require additional infrastructure or configurations to handle high levels of traffic and large repositories efficiently.
Support and Maintenance: Google Cloud Source Repositories come with support from Google Cloud, ensuring timely updates, maintenance, and technical assistance. Perforce, while offering support plans, may require additional resources for maintenance and upgrades, especially for on-premise installations.

In Summary, Google Cloud Source Repositories and Perforce differ in terms of integration with cloud platforms, licensing models, collaboration features, version control systems, scalability, and support.

🔥 Trending in Code Collaboration on StackShare

Glide

Code Collaboration

AI-assisted technical design docs

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

8

Detailed Comparison

Perforce	Google Cloud Source Repositories
Visibility, access control, workflow and code management for Git environments. Flexibility of collaborating on the same codebase and code reviews using any combination of Perforce and Git workflows and tools without compromise.	Collaborate easily and securely manage your code on a fully featured, scalable, private Git repository. Extend your Git workflow by connecting to other GCP tools, including Cloud Build, App Engine, Stackdriver, and Cloud Pub/Sub. Get access to fast, indexed powerful code search across all your owned repositories to save time.
Version Control; Application Lifecycle Management; Static Code Analysis for C, C++, C#, and Java; Codeless Selenium Test Automation; Open Source Support; Enterprise PHP Development	Unlimited private Git repositories;Deploy directly from Cloud Source Repositories;Automatically build and test your source code;Versioning and aliasing for serverless requests;Debug in production;Detailed audit logs;
Statistics
Stacks 83	Stacks 91
Followers 113	Followers 160
Votes 9	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Great for Enterprise level use 3 Powerful 2 Robust 1 Scalable	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Git	Git GitLab GitHub Google App Engine Bitbucket Stackdriver Google Cloud Pub/Sub

What are some alternatives to Perforce, Google Cloud Source Repositories?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.