StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Google Kubernetes Engine vs OpenShift

Google Kubernetes Engine vs OpenShift

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Stacks1.6K
Followers1.4K
Votes517
GitHub Stars885
Forks510
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Stacks1.1K
Followers814
Votes78

Google Kubernetes Engine vs OpenShift: What are the differences?

Introduction

Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) and OpenShift are both popular platforms for managing containerized applications. While they share similarities, there are key differences that make each platform unique. This Markdown code provides a concise summary of the differences between GKE and OpenShift.

  1. Managed vs Self-Managed: GKE is a managed Kubernetes service provided by Google Cloud, which means Google manages the underlying infrastructure, including the control plane. On the other hand, OpenShift is a self-managed platform that requires the user to set up and manage the control plane themselves.

  2. Vendor Lock-in: GKE is tightly integrated with Google Cloud services, which can be beneficial for organizations already using Google Cloud or planning to do so. However, this can create vendor lock-in, as GKE may not be as compatible with other cloud providers. OpenShift, being an open-source platform, offers more flexibility and can be deployed on various cloud providers or on-premises.

  3. Pricing Model: GKE has a pay-as-you-go pricing model where users pay for the resources they use. This can be advantageous for organizations with fluctuating workloads. OpenShift, being self-managed, often requires a subscription or license agreement, which may involve fixed costs. This can be more suitable for organizations with predictable workloads.

  4. Ease of Deployment: GKE provides a streamlined and user-friendly deployment process, making it easier for users to set up and manage Kubernetes clusters. OpenShift, with its additional features and customization options, may have a steeper learning curve and more complex deployment process. It is better suited for organizations that require fine-grained control over their containerized applications.

  5. Integrated Tools and Services: GKE leverages Google Cloud's extensive ecosystem of tools and services, such as monitoring, logging, load balancing, and auto-scaling, which are seamlessly integrated with the platform. OpenShift also provides similar capabilities but may require additional configuration or integration with external services.

  6. Enterprise Support and Community: Both GKE and OpenShift have active communities and offer enterprise support options. However, GKE benefits from Google's reputation and resources, providing robust support and a large community of users. OpenShift, being an open-source project primarily supported by Red Hat, offers support through Red Hat's enterprise-level services.

In summary, GKE is a fully managed Kubernetes service with tight integration to Google Cloud, while OpenShift is a self-managed and more flexible platform that can be deployed across cloud providers. GKE offers a streamlined deployment process and Google Cloud integration, while OpenShift provides additional customization options and a broader range of deployment possibilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Container Engine takes care of provisioning and maintaining the underlying virtual machine cluster, scaling your application, and operational logistics like logging, monitoring, and health management.

Built-in support for Node.js, Ruby, Python, PHP, Perl, and Java (the standard in today's Enterprise);OpenShift is extensible with a customizable cartridge functionality that allows developers to add any other language they wish. We've seen everything from Clojure to Cobol running on OpenShift;OpenShift supports frameworks ranging from Spring, to Rails, to Play;Autoscaling- OpenShift can scale your application by adding additional instances of your application and enabling clustering. Alternatively, you can manually scale the amount of resources with which your application is deployed when needed;OpenShift by Red Hat is built on open-source technologies (Red Hat Enterprise Linux- RHEL);One Click Deployment- Deploying to the OpenShift platform is as easy a clicking a button or entering a "Git push" command
Docker support - Improve the predictability of your deployments with Docker containers. Containers make it easy to deploy applications across environments.; Better ops - Give ops a better system, starting with a managed compute cluster. Container Engine takes care of provisioning and maintaining the underlying virtual machines and operational logistics like logging, monitoring, and health management.;Declarative management - Use declarative syntax to define your application requirements. Container Engine will actively manage your application, ensuring your containers are running and scheduling additional as needed.;Scalable - Run multiple containers in a single virtual machine, or scale to many as your application grows. Container Engine makes it easy to manage your containers across a group of virtual machines.;Powered by Kubernetes - Container Engine is powered by the open source Kubernetes technology. Join the discussion on Kubernetes and be part of the growing community.;Decoupled apps - Let developers focus on code, with very few constraints. Create loosely coupled microservice apps that are more robust and easier to maintain and extend.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
885
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
510
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.6K
Stacks
1.1K
Followers
1.4K
Followers
814
Votes
517
Votes
78
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 99
    Good free plan
  • 63
    Open Source
  • 47
    Easy setup
  • 43
    Nodejs support
  • 42
    Well documented
Cons
  • 2
    Decisions are made for you, limiting your options
  • 2
    License cost
  • 1
    Behind, sometimes severely, the upstreams
Pros
  • 18
    Backed by Google
  • 18
    Powered by kubernetes
  • 13
    Docker
  • 12
    Scalable
  • 7
    Open source
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Red Hat OpenShift, Google Kubernetes Engine?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot