Google Kubernetes Engine vs Red Hat OpenShift

Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine

697
439
+ 1
63
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift

667
644
+ 1
468
Add tool

Google Kubernetes Engine vs OpenShift: What are the differences?

Developers describe Google Kubernetes Engine as "Deploy, manage, and scale containerized applications on Kubernetes, powered by Google Cloud". Container Engine takes care of provisioning and maintaining the underlying virtual machine cluster, scaling your application, and operational logistics like logging, monitoring, and health management. On the other hand, OpenShift is detailed as "Red Hat's free Platform as a Service (PaaS) for hosting Java, PHP, Ruby, Python, Node.js, and Perl apps". OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Google Kubernetes Engine can be classified as a tool in the "Containers as a Service" category, while OpenShift is grouped under "Platform as a Service".

Some of the features offered by Google Kubernetes Engine are:

  • Docker support - Improve the predictability of your deployments with Docker containers. Containers make it easy to deploy applications across environments.
  • Better ops - Give ops a better system, starting with a managed compute cluster. Container Engine takes care of provisioning and maintaining the underlying virtual machines and operational logistics like logging, monitoring, and health management.
  • Declarative management - Use declarative syntax to define your application requirements. Container Engine will actively manage your application, ensuring your containers are running and scheduling additional as needed.

On the other hand, OpenShift provides the following key features:

  • Built-in support for Node.js, Ruby, Python, PHP, Perl, and Java (the standard in today's Enterprise)
  • OpenShift is extensible with a customizable cartridge functionality that allows developers to add any other language they wish. We've seen everything from Clojure to Cobol running on OpenShift.
  • OpenShift supports frameworks ranging from Spring, to Rails, to Play

"Powered by kubernetes" is the top reason why over 15 developers like Google Kubernetes Engine, while over 95 developers mention "Good free plan" as the leading cause for choosing OpenShift.

OpenShift is an open source tool with 913 GitHub stars and 561 GitHub forks. Here's a link to OpenShift's open source repository on GitHub.

According to the StackShare community, Google Kubernetes Engine has a broader approval, being mentioned in 248 company stacks & 252 developers stacks; compared to OpenShift, which is listed in 76 company stacks and 358 developer stacks.

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Google Kubernetes Engine?

Container Engine takes care of provisioning and maintaining the underlying virtual machine cluster, scaling your application, and operational logistics like logging, monitoring, and health management.

What is Red Hat OpenShift?

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Google Kubernetes Engine?
Why do developers choose Red Hat OpenShift?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    Be the first to leave a con
    Jobs that mention Google Kubernetes Engine and Red Hat OpenShift as a desired skillset
    What companies use Google Kubernetes Engine?
    What companies use Red Hat OpenShift?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Google Kubernetes Engine?
    What tools integrate with Red Hat OpenShift?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Google Kubernetes Engine and Red Hat OpenShift?
    Google App Engine
    Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.
    Google Compute Engine
    Google Compute Engine is a service that provides virtual machines that run on Google infrastructure. Google Compute Engine offers scale, performance, and value that allows you to easily launch large compute clusters on Google's infrastructure. There are no upfront investments and you can run up to thousands of virtual CPUs on a system that has been designed from the ground up to be fast, and to offer strong consistency of performance.
    Amazon EC2 Container Service
    Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles.
    Amazon EKS
    Amazon Elastic Container Service for Kubernetes (Amazon EKS) is a managed service that makes it easy for you to run Kubernetes on AWS without needing to install and operate your own Kubernetes clusters.
    AWS Fargate
    AWS Fargate is a technology for Amazon ECS and EKS* that allows you to run containers without having to manage servers or clusters. With AWS Fargate, you no longer have to provision, configure, and scale clusters of virtual machines to run containers.
    See all alternatives
    Decisions about Google Kubernetes Engine and Red Hat OpenShift
    Heroku
    Heroku
    Red Hat OpenShift
    Red Hat OpenShift
    Docker
    Docker

    Heroku vs OpenShift. I've never decided which one is better. Heroku is easier to configure. Openshift provide a better machine for free. Heroku has many addons for free. I've chosen Heroku because of easy initial set-up. I had deployment based on git push. I also tried direct deployment of jar file. Currently Heroku runs my Docker image. Heroku has very good documentation like for beginners. So if you want to start with something, let's follow Heroku. On the other hand OpenShift seems like a PRO tool supported by @RedHat.

    See more
    Russel Werner
    Russel Werner
    Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 0 upvotes · 10.3K views
    atStackShareStackShare
    Heroku
    Heroku
    Kubernetes
    Kubernetes
    Amazon EKS
    Amazon EKS
    Google Kubernetes Engine
    Google Kubernetes Engine
    Slack
    Slack
    Helm
    Helm
    CircleCI
    CircleCI
    Amazon EC2 Container Service
    Amazon EC2 Container Service

    We began our hosting journey, as many do, on Heroku because they make it easy to deploy your application and automate some of the routine tasks associated with deployments, etc. However, as our team grew and our product matured, our needs have outgrown Heroku. I will dive into the history and reasons for this in a future blog post.

    We decided to migrate our infrastructure to Kubernetes running on Amazon EKS. Although Google Kubernetes Engine has a slightly more mature Kubernetes offering and is more user-friendly; we decided to go with EKS because we already using other AWS services (including a previous migration from Heroku Postgres to AWS RDS). We are still in the process of moving our main website workloads to EKS, however we have successfully migrate all our staging and testing PR apps to run in a staging cluster. We developed a Slack chatops application (also running in the cluster) which automates all the common tasks of spinning up and managing a production-like cluster for a pull request. This allows our engineering team to iterate quickly and safely test code in a full production environment. Helm plays a central role when deploying our staging apps into the cluster. We use CircleCI to build docker containers for each PR push, which are then published to Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECR). An upgrade-operator process watches the ECR repository for new containers and then uses Helm to rollout updates to the staging environments. All this happens automatically and makes it really easy for developers to get code onto servers quickly. The immutable and isolated nature of our staging environments means that we can do anything we want in that environment and quickly re-create or restore the environment to start over.

    The next step in our journey is to migrate our production workloads to an EKS cluster and build out the CD workflows to get our containers promoted to that cluster after our QA testing is complete in our staging environments.

    See more
    Interest over time
    Reviews of Google Kubernetes Engine and Red Hat OpenShift
    Review ofRed Hat OpenShiftRed Hat OpenShift

    I needed a PaaS provider that didn't drop all the time and it's hard to find a good option for PHP applications. Openshift takes care of it. They are a little behind on PHP versions, but that can be solved with a custom cartridge. It requires a little more elbow grease to get rolling when you want to implement something they don't already have, but their quickstarts are great to get rolling with the basics quickly.

    Review ofGoogle Kubernetes EngineGoogle Kubernetes Engine

    Since it is mostly backed by Kubernetes, GCE looks really promising. I did run into some fuzzy bugs as I did expect with Alpha.

    I recommend giving it a lab-test-try and engage in discussion about Kubernetes.

    How developers use Google Kubernetes Engine and Red Hat OpenShift
    Avatar of kelumkps
    kelumkps uses Red Hat OpenShiftRed Hat OpenShift

    SG-TravelBuddy server application is hosted on Red Hat OpenShift Online (v3). SG-TravelBuddy mobile (Android) app is connecting to this server for data operations.

    Avatar of papaver
    papaver uses Google Kubernetes EngineGoogle Kubernetes Engine

    used this when setting up the kubernetes infrastructure for a client.

    Avatar of Japan Digital Design
    Japan Digital Design uses Google Kubernetes EngineGoogle Kubernetes Engine

    Our developer experience system is on Google Kubernetes Engine.

    Avatar of InApplet
    InApplet uses Red Hat OpenShiftRed Hat OpenShift

    Servidor das aplicações de Back-end

    Avatar of azawisza
    azawisza uses Red Hat OpenShiftRed Hat OpenShift

    Main cloud infrastructure provider

    Avatar of Miyuru Sankalpa
    Miyuru Sankalpa uses Red Hat OpenShiftRed Hat OpenShift

    To host the blog powered by ghost

    Avatar of AyeDeals
    AyeDeals uses Red Hat OpenShiftRed Hat OpenShift

    OpenShift is our PaaS.

    How much does Google Kubernetes Engine cost?
    How much does Red Hat OpenShift cost?
    Pricing unavailable