Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Google Meet

496
547
+ 1
155
WebRTC

316
525
+ 1
6
Add tool

Google Meet vs WebRTC: What are the differences?

Introduction

Google Meet and WebRTC are both technologies used for video conferencing and real-time communication over the internet. While they have some similarities, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Video and Audio Quality: One key difference between Google Meet and WebRTC is their video and audio quality. Google Meet offers high-definition video and audio quality, ensuring a clear and crisp communication experience for users. On the other hand, WebRTC's video and audio quality can vary depending on the network conditions and the capabilities of the devices being used.

  2. Browser Support: Another difference lies in the browser support. Google Meet is a web-based video conferencing tool that is supported on multiple browsers, including Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, and Microsoft Edge. In contrast, WebRTC is a technology that is natively supported by modern web browsers, allowing developers to directly utilize it for real-time communication without the need for additional plugins or extensions.

  3. Features and Functionality: Google Meet offers a range of features and functionalities tailored for online meetings and collaboration, including screen sharing, chat, and the ability to integrate with other Google services. WebRTC, being a technology, provides the foundation for real-time communication and collaboration but does not offer these additional features out of the box. Developers can build their own applications using WebRTC and customize the features based on their specific requirements.

  4. User Interface: The user interface of Google Meet is designed to be intuitive and user-friendly, allowing participants to easily join meetings, access shared content, and interact with others. WebRTC does not have a specific user interface as it is a technology that can be integrated into different applications. The user interface for WebRTC-based applications can vary depending on the developer's design choices.

  5. Administration and Management: Google Meet provides extensive administration and management capabilities, allowing administrators to control meeting settings, manage participants, and monitor usage. WebRTC, being a technology, does not offer these administrative features by default. The administration and management of WebRTC-based applications need to be implemented separately by the developers or integrated with existing management systems.

  6. Integration and Ecosystem: Google Meet is part of the broader Google Workspace ecosystem, which includes various other productivity and collaboration tools. This integration allows for seamless integration and interoperability between different Google services. WebRTC, being an open-source technology, can be integrated into different applications and platforms, providing developers with the flexibility to build customized communication solutions tailored to their specific needs.

In summary, Google Meet and WebRTC differ in terms of video and audio quality, browser support, features and functionality, user interface, administration and management capabilities, and integration and ecosystem. While Google Meet is a fully developed video conferencing tool with a comprehensive set of features, WebRTC serves as a technology foundation for real-time communication applications that can be customized and integrated into various platforms.

Advice on Google Meet and WebRTC
Needs advice
on
Amazon ChimeAmazon Chime
and
WebRTCWebRTC

Hello. So, I wanted to make a decision on whether to use WebRTC or Amazon Chime for a conference call (meeting). My plan is to build an app with features like video broadcasting, and the ability for all the participants to talk and chat. I have used Agora's web SDK for video broadcasting, and Socket.IO for chat features. As I read the comparison between Amazon Chime and WebRTC, it further intrigues me on what I should use given my scenario? Is there any way that so many related technologies could be a hindrance to the other? Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks. Ritwik Neema

See more
Replies (1)
Edwin Ifionu
Software Developer at Sproft Media Inc · | 4 upvotes · 51.6K views
Recommends
on
Amazon ChimeAmazon Chime

I would recommend Amazon Chime. If I were you, I would eventually look into working with WebRTC as it is very interesting and teaches you a lot. I dove deep into webRTC recently building a webinar broadcasting application (one-to-many) and I can say it is difficult to understand how things actually work and to get it stable. I mean you can vaguely read up on it and get some things to work by copying code on StackOverflow or using a library but that wouldn't teach you much.

In short, go with Chime because it is easy to get started especially if you have a time constraint. But look into webRTC in the future as it enables you to build your own "Chime". Hope this helped!

See more
Needs advice
on
Google MeetGoogle Meet
and
ZoomZoom

I have a google account and use google classroom. I want to give classes online, including screen-sharing, and going in and out of multiple documents on screen.

Even though I am paying for my google account, I still want to explore which of these two tools is best for what I want to do. My classes vary from 5 to 20 persons per class, three times per week, and have a duration of 2 times 45 min.

See more
Replies (1)
Recommends
on
ZoomZoom

I’m in the same boat as a teacher. I researched both, used both, I like Zoom much better. I like to compare it to Google having the lite version of an app while Zoom is the paid version. Zoom allows the “Host” to control every aspect from password protecting your room to the host admitting people in individually. I know Zoom is normally paid but has a limited free version. Hope this helps but Zoom seems much further ahead.

See more
Needs advice
on
Google MeetGoogle Meet
and
ZoomZoom

I own an Escape Room. Since right now everyone is practicing social distancing, I would like to run my Escape Room games virtually. I would like to allow approx 4 users to log in to play. They can chitchat a few minutes before their game to get to know each other. Then once the game begins, I will introduce myself and give them the plot to their escape game. I will have a wide-angle camera mounted to the wall to show the room, and as the game master, carry a tablet or webcam around as players talk to me and direct me to show them certain items in the room, move in for closeups in certain areas, try lock combinations, etc. I will be their hands while they solve the puzzles. I am not sure if Google Hangouts Google Meet or Zoom is better for this. I did try it yesterday using google hangout meet and it was good, but I think there may have been a wifi issue where it was choppy. Just trying to figure out the best option. Thank you! Catherine

See more
Replies (4)
Verhaeghe Jonas
Sr. Marketing Technologist at Invisible Puppy · | 3 upvotes · 131.2K views
Recommends
on
ZoomZoom

I would suggest Zoom: - quality sound and audio is great - simple to set up and invite people + it doesn't matter if they have a microsoft, google, etc. email account or operating system - recently it added a couple of security options which could be handy in your situation = for example 'lock meeting' - once all your participants have logged in you can 'lock the meeting' to prevent others from entering. Another on is the enable waiting room, where participants can 'wait' before you allow them in the meeting.

See more
Recommends
on
ZoomZoom

Google meet, as well as zoom are amazing platforms for online meetings. But I will try to explain the pros and cons of both according to your needs.

  1. Network requirements: Google meet requires considerably more bandwidth than zoom, and it isn't a great choice if you have poor internet, or if there are more than 25 or 30 participants. While zoom is pretty lightweight and can support large groups (say about 80) with little to no internet instability.

  2. UI: Zoom and google meet have decent UI, but assuming that participants will be using mobiles, they might have a hard time with chatting in zoom as it takes up a lot of space to view all contents.

  3. Security: Even though both zoom and google meet provide 100% encrypted connections, I personally think google meet is somewhat better due to the flaws in the recent zoom security patches.

  4. Battery consumption: Google meet hogs up your battery when uploading your video and also your video quality, unlike zoom will not be adjusted based on your network, meaning, even if you have poor internet, google meet will upload your video in high quality, sometimes leading to lag and hangs.

NOTE: If you are using the free version of zoom, your meeting will automatically end after 40 minutes. So either keep your games small, or buy the premium version.

In the end I think zoom will be a better choice according to your needs, but if you plan on buying zoom, I recommend you read other reviews about zoom. Enjoy and stay safe!

See more
Recommends
on
ZoomZoom

Zoom has lot more features and higher quality. Agree with the other people's advice. Make sure to realize it is 40 min limit for free account - but you can do monthly Zoom subscription and try it out or only use during pandemic and cancel subscription once this is over if you need to.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Google Meet
Pros of WebRTC
  • 35
    Free
  • 15
    Integrated with G Suite
  • 14
    Group video call
  • 10
    Gmail server integration
  • 10
    Good to make phone calls
  • 9
    Instant Messaging
  • 9
    Easy to add and remove contacts
  • 7
    Unlimited Storage (Premium version)
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 6
    User friendly mobile app
  • 6
    Record (Premium Feature)
  • 5
    Accessible from the Browser
  • 5
    Saves the chats for future reference
  • 5
    Browser extension
  • 3
    No pornography
  • 2
    Google Meet is never buggy
  • 2
    Cool emoji extensions
  • 2
    Amazing captions
  • 2
    16 people show at the same time
  • 2
    Meet has the best quality in terms of participant view
  • 3
    OpenSource
  • 2
    No Download
  • 1
    You can write anything around it, because it's a protoc

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Google Meet
Cons of WebRTC
  • 9
    Quality isn't great
  • 5
    Really high CPU utilization during video/screenshare
  • 2
    No client annotation on shared screen
  • 2
    Not great sound quality
  • 2
    Difficult to share video with audio
  • 2
    Needs to take measures to improve the ecosystem
  • 1
    Auto-added to G Cal invites
  • 1
    Needs better support and rollout process
  • 1
    No interactions activities
  • 1
    Overheat cpu on Android
  • 1
    No desktop client
  • 1
    No desktop client
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Google Meet?

    It is the business-oriented version of Google's Hangouts platform and is suitable for businesses of all sizes. It allows users to dial in phone numbers to access meetings, thus enabling users with slow internet connection to call in.

    What is WebRTC?

    It is a free, open project that enables web browsers with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities via simple JavaScript APIs. The WebRTC components have been optimized to best serve this purpose.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Google Meet?
    What companies use WebRTC?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Google Meet or WebRTC.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Google Meet?
    What tools integrate with WebRTC?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Google Meet and WebRTC?
    Hangouts
    It is a communication platform which includes messaging, video chat, and VOIP features.
    Zoom
    Zoom unifies cloud video conferencing, simple online meetings, and cross platform group chat into one easy-to-use platform. Our solution offers the best video, audio, and screen-sharing experience across Zoom Rooms, Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, and H.323/SIP room systems.
    Skype
    Skype’s text, voice and video make it simple to share experiences with the people that matter to you, wherever they are.
    Webex
    Collaborate with colleagues across your organization, or halfway across the planet. Meet online and share files, information, and expertise. Collaborate from wherever you are with Webex mobile apps for IPhone, iPad, Android, or Blackberry. If you can get online, you can work together.
    GoToMeeting
    It is an online meeting, desktop sharing, and video conferencing software package that enables the user to meet with other computer users, customers, clients or colleagues via the Internet in real time.
    See all alternatives