StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Cloud Content Management System
  5. GraphCMS vs Sanity

GraphCMS vs Sanity

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GraphCMS
GraphCMS
Stacks56
Followers99
Votes11
Sanity
Sanity
Stacks180
Followers298
Votes81
GitHub Stars5.9K
Forks497

GraphCMS vs Sanity: What are the differences?

Comparison: GraphCMS vs Sanity

GraphCMS and Sanity are two popular headless CMS (Content Management Systems) that provide a range of features for managing and delivering content. While they share similarities in terms of being API-driven and offering customization options, there are key differences that set them apart. Here are the top six differences between GraphCMS and Sanity:

  1. Data Modeling Approach: GraphCMS follows a schema-based approach where content models are defined upfront using a visual interface. This allows for a structured and controlled data model. On the other hand, Sanity follows a schema-less approach, offering more flexibility and agility in data modeling. Developers can define and change the data structure on the fly, making it suitable for projects with evolving requirements.

  2. Content Editor Experience: GraphCMS provides a user-friendly and intuitive content editor experience with a clean interface. It offers editing capabilities directly within the web application, making it easy for non-technical users to manage content. In contrast, Sanity focuses on providing a customizable and extensible editing environment. It allows developers to create tailored authoring experiences with the flexibility to choose different text editing tools, plugins, and workflows.

  3. Rich Text Editing: GraphCMS has a built-in WYSIWYG editor that enables users to create and format rich text content easily. It offers a range of text formatting options, such as headings, lists, and hyperlinks. Conversely, Sanity takes a modular approach to rich text editing. It uses a block-based approach, where each piece of content is a structured block, enabling greater flexibility and control over content presentation.

  4. Deployment Options: GraphCMS provides a hosted solution, allowing users to leverage their infrastructure and take care of scaling and maintenance. It also offers the option for self-hosting for those who prefer full control. Meanwhile, Sanity offers a cloud-hosted service with built-in CDN (Content Delivery Network), taking care of infrastructure and scaling. Additionally, Sanity can also be self-hosted if desired.

  5. Querying and Retrieving Data: GraphCMS utilizes GraphQL as its query language and provides an intuitive GraphQL API for retrieving data. It allows users to easily define complex queries and retrieve only the required data. In contrast, Sanity uses GROQ (Graph-Relational Object Queries), a custom query language. GROQ provides powerful querying capabilities, allowing users to deeply query and combine data from different content types.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: GraphCMS has a growing community and a range of pre-built integrations, plugins, and extensions. It offers a marketplace where users can find additional tools to enhance their projects. Conversely, Sanity has a vibrant community and an open-source ecosystem. It provides a collection of open-source tools, plugins, and libraries contributed by the community, extending the functionality of Sanity.

In summary, GraphCMS and Sanity differ in their data modeling approach, content editor experience, rich text editing options, deployment options, querying and retrieving data, and the community and ecosystem they offer. These differences allow users to choose the CMS that best aligns with their project's requirements and development preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GraphCMS, Sanity

Maxim
Maxim

Web developer

Apr 14, 2020

Needs adviceonSanitySanity

Hi Community, Would like to ask for advice from people familiar with those tools. We are a small self-funded startup and initial cost for us is very important at that stage. That's why we are leaning towards Sanity. The CMS will be used to power our website and flutter cross-platform mobile applications.

108k views108k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GraphCMS
GraphCMS
Sanity
Sanity

GraphCMS is a GraphQL Based Headless Content Management System. It lets you build a hosted GraphQL backend for your applications and gives you all the tools you need to manage your content.

Sanity is a headless, real-time CMS where the editor is an open source React-based construction kit and the backend is a graph-oriented cloud datastore with a globally distributed CDN.

Localization;Webhooks;GraphQL API;GraphQL Mutations;Audit Logs;GraphQL;Content Management;CMS;i18n;DAM
Open source editing environment; Hosted & scalable APIs; Rich, precise data model; Graph oriented query language; Global asset and query CDN
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
5.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
497
Stacks
56
Stacks
180
Followers
99
Followers
298
Votes
11
Votes
81
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    GraphQL
  • 2
    Speeds up time to market Easily create & consume conten
  • 1
    Much better than REST
  • 1
    Reliable and scales
  • 1
    API first
Pros
  • 12
    Headless
  • 11
    Hosted
  • 7
    Realtime
  • 7
    Powerful read + write API
  • 7
    Free for small projects
Integrations
Next.js
Next.js
GraphQL
GraphQL
Gatsby
Gatsby
Algolia
Algolia
JavaScript
JavaScript
React Native
React Native
Vue.js
Vue.js
React
React
Next.js
Next.js

What are some alternatives to GraphCMS, Sanity?

Contentful

Contentful

With Contentful, you can bring your content anywhere using our APIs, completely customize your content structure all while using your preferred programming languages and frameworks.

Tipe

Tipe

All your Apps have text and your developers don't want to manage it. Create and manage your text or assets with powerful editing tools and access it from anywhere with a GraphQL or REST API.

prismic.io

prismic.io

Prismic is a Content Management System, a tool for editing online content, also known as a headless CMS, an API CMS, a content platform, a disruptive content-as-a-service digital experience.

Cockpit

Cockpit

An API-driven CMS without forcing you to make compromises in how you implement your site. The CMS for developers. Manage content like collections, regions, forms and galleries which you can reuse anywhere on your website.

Cloud CMS

Cloud CMS

Easily Create, Upload and Edit;Use Simple Content Forms;Full Text Search and Query; Workspaces

Scrivito

Scrivito

Scrivito is a cloud-based JavaScript CMS, built for digital agencies and medium to large-sized businesses. Scrivito is based on ReactJS and 100% serverless, so you'll never have to patch your CMS.

Osmek

Osmek

Build your site in any programming language, or framework, on any server. Distribute your content to one site, or fifty, in JSON or RSS, as custom templates, or XML. With your content tucked snuggly in the cloud, you're free to develop your way.

PushTable

PushTable

Flexible data structure, direct data table inputs and serverless support makes PushTable the perfect data management tool for front-end developers and development agencies. PushTable easily integrates with static site generators, and mobile SDK.

Nuxeo

Nuxeo

It is a platform for rich and structured content management. Its cloud-native, modular platform plugs easily into legacy infrastructure, scales with your team, and your progress.

CloudCannon

CloudCannon

CloudCannon is the fast, intuitive solution for your Jekyll needs. Build, update, and deliver content to your customers.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack