Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

GraphQL Mesh

7
22
+ 1
0
graphql-yoga

95
144
+ 1
3
Add tool

GraphQL Mesh vs graphql-yoga: What are the differences?

Introduction:

GraphQL Mesh and graphql-yoga are both tools used for working with GraphQL in different ways. GraphQL Mesh is a library that allows developers to easily generate a GraphQL schema by merging data from various sources, while graphql-yoga is a fully-featured GraphQL server that simplifies the process of building GraphQL APIs. Although they both relate to GraphQL, there are some key differences between the two:

  1. Code Generation: GraphQL Mesh generates a GraphQL schema by merging data from various sources, such as REST APIs, GraphQL endpoints, or databases. It provides a way to generate code automatically, reducing the manual effort required in building a schema. On the other hand, graphql-yoga doesn't provide code generation capabilities and requires manually defining the schema and resolvers.

  2. Data Source Handling: GraphQL Mesh simplifies the process of handling data sources by providing built-in connectors for different APIs and data sources. It abstracts away the complexities of integrating with different systems, making it easier to merge data from these sources into a single GraphQL schema. In contrast, graphql-yoga doesn't provide out-of-the-box data source handling, and developers have to manually handle the integration with different APIs and data sources.

  3. Schema Composition: GraphQL Mesh offers advanced schema composition capabilities, allowing developers to merge data from various sources into a single GraphQL schema seamlessly. It provides a flexible and powerful way to combine data from different systems, making it easier to query and manipulate data. On the other hand, graphql-yoga focuses more on providing a simple and intuitive way to build GraphQL APIs without the complexity of schema composition.

  4. Plugin Ecosystem: GraphQL Mesh has a rich plugin ecosystem that allows developers to extend its functionality and integrate with other tools or frameworks. It provides a way to add custom logic, resolvers, or other features to enhance the capabilities of the generated schema. In contrast, graphql-yoga doesn't have a dedicated plugin ecosystem, and developers have to rely on external libraries or manually implement additional functionality.

  5. Dependency Management: GraphQL Mesh automatically handles the installation and management of dependencies required for generating the GraphQL schema. It simplifies the process of installing and configuring the necessary packages, reducing the setup complexity. On the other hand, graphql-yoga requires developers to manually manage dependencies and handle the installation of required packages.

  6. Community Support: GraphQL Mesh has gained popularity in the GraphQL community and has an active community support, which includes documentation, tutorials, and forums to assist developers in using the tool effectively. graphql-yoga, being a part of the Prisma ecosystem, also has community support but may have a more targeted audience.

In summary, GraphQL Mesh focuses on generating a GraphQL schema by merging data from various sources, providing code generation and data source handling capabilities, while graphql-yoga simplifies the process of building GraphQL APIs without the complexities of schema composition and provides a fully-featured GraphQL server.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of GraphQL Mesh
Pros of graphql-yoga
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 3
      Easy to setup. No boilerplate code

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    What is GraphQL Mesh?

    It allows you to use GraphQL query language to access data in remote APIs that don't run GraphQL (and also ones that do run GraphQL). It can be used as a gateway to other services, or run as a local GraphQL schema that aggregates data from remote APIs.

    What is graphql-yoga?

    Easiest way to run a GraphQL server: Sensible defaults & includes everything you need with minimal setup.;Includes Subscriptions: Built-in support for GraphQL subscriptions using WebSockets.;Compatible: Works with all GraphQL clients (Apollo, Relay...) and fits seamless in your GraphQL workflow.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use GraphQL Mesh?
    What companies use graphql-yoga?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with GraphQL Mesh?
    What tools integrate with graphql-yoga?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to GraphQL Mesh and graphql-yoga?
    GraphQL
    GraphQL is a data query language and runtime designed and used at Facebook to request and deliver data to mobile and web apps since 2012.
    JavaScript
    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
    Python
    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.
    Node.js
    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.
    HTML5
    HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.
    See all alternatives