StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. GraphQL vs Kafka

GraphQL vs Kafka

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kafka
Kafka
Stacks24.2K
Followers22.3K
Votes607
GitHub Stars31.2K
Forks14.8K
GraphQL
GraphQL
Stacks34.9K
Followers28.1K
Votes309

GraphQL vs Kafka: What are the differences?

  1. Key Difference 1: Query Language vs Message Streaming Platform: The first major difference between GraphQL and Kafka is their core purpose and functionality. GraphQL is a query language that allows clients to request and receive specific data from a server, providing a flexible and efficient way to retrieve data. On the other hand, Kafka is a distributed message streaming platform that is designed for handling high-throughput, fault-tolerant, and real-time data pipelines and streaming applications.

  2. Key Difference 2: Data Aggregation vs Data Pub-Sub: Another significant difference between GraphQL and Kafka lies in their data handling approaches. GraphQL focuses on data aggregation, where clients can specify the exact data they need and receive the combined response from the server. In contrast, Kafka follows a data pub-sub model, where messages are published to specific topics and subscribed by one or more consumers, allowing for asynchronous and scalable communication among distributed systems.

  3. Key Difference 3: Flexibility vs Scalability: GraphQL provides great flexibility for clients to define their data requirements and receive a custom-tailored response, which is beneficial for frontend applications with varying data needs. On the other hand, Kafka prioritizes scalability, enabling high-throughput and fault-tolerant data streaming for real-time processing and analysis, making it suitable for handling massive volumes of data across multiple systems.

  4. Key Difference 4: Single Request-Response vs Continuous Stream: GraphQL follows a request-response pattern, where a single request is sent to the server, and the server responds with the requested data. In contrast, Kafka operates on a continuous stream of data, allowing for real-time data processing, stream processing, and event-driven architectures, where data is continuously flowing through the system.

  5. Key Difference 5: Schema-Driven vs Log-Driven: GraphQL relies on a schema-driven approach, where the server defines a schema that describes the available data and operations, enabling clients to query and manipulate data accordingly. On the contrary, Kafka is log-driven, storing all the records (messages) in logs with sequential ordering, providing fault tolerance, durability, and the ability to process past data as well.

  6. Key Difference 6: Point-to-Point vs Distributed Publish-Subscribe: GraphQL operates on a point-to-point communication model, where clients specify the exact data they need, and the server responds with that data alone. In contrast, Kafka follows a distributed publish-subscribe model, where messages are broadcasted to multiple consumers (subscribers) interested in specific topics, enabling a streaming architecture with decoupled and scalable communication channels.

In Summary, GraphQL is a query language focused on providing flexible data retrieval with data aggregation, while Kafka is a message streaming platform emphasizing scalability and real-time data pipelines with data pub-sub and log-driven approach.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Kafka, GraphQL

viradiya
viradiya

Apr 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSASP.NET CoreASP.NET CoreMSSQLMSSQL

We are going to develop a microservices-based application. It consists of AngularJS, ASP.NET Core, and MSSQL.

We have 3 types of microservices. Emailservice, Filemanagementservice, Filevalidationservice

I am a beginner in microservices. But I have read about RabbitMQ, but come to know that there are Redis and Kafka also in the market. So, I want to know which is best.

933k views933k
Comments
Ishfaq
Ishfaq

Feb 28, 2020

Needs advice

Our backend application is sending some external messages to a third party application at the end of each backend (CRUD) API call (from UI) and these external messages take too much extra time (message building, processing, then sent to the third party and log success/failure), UI application has no concern to these extra third party messages.

So currently we are sending these third party messages by creating a new child thread at end of each REST API call so UI application doesn't wait for these extra third party API calls.

I want to integrate Apache Kafka for these extra third party API calls, so I can also retry on failover third party API calls in a queue(currently third party messages are sending from multiple threads at the same time which uses too much processing and resources) and logging, etc.

Question 1: Is this a use case of a message broker?

Question 2: If it is then Kafka vs RabitMQ which is the better?

804k views804k
Comments
Roman
Roman

Senior Back-End Developer, Software Architect

Feb 12, 2019

ReviewonKafkaKafka

I use Kafka because it has almost infinite scaleability in terms of processing events (could be scaled to process hundreds of thousands of events), great monitoring (all sorts of metrics are exposed via JMX).

Downsides of using Kafka are:

  • you have to deal with Zookeeper
  • you have to implement advanced routing yourself (compared to RabbitMQ it has no advanced routing)
10.8k views10.8k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Kafka
Kafka
GraphQL
GraphQL

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

GraphQL is a data query language and runtime designed and used at Facebook to request and deliver data to mobile and web apps since 2012.

Written at LinkedIn in Scala;Used by LinkedIn to offload processing of all page and other views;Defaults to using persistence, uses OS disk cache for hot data (has higher throughput then any of the above having persistence enabled);Supports both on-line as off-line processing
Hierarchical;Product-centric;Client-specified queries;Backwards Compatible;Structured, Arbitrary Code;Application-Layer Protocol;Strongly-typed;Introspective
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
14.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
24.2K
Stacks
34.9K
Followers
22.3K
Followers
28.1K
Votes
607
Votes
309
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 126
    High-throughput
  • 119
    Distributed
  • 92
    Scalable
  • 86
    High-Performance
  • 66
    Durable
Cons
  • 32
    Non-Java clients are second-class citizens
  • 29
    Needs Zookeeper
  • 9
    Operational difficulties
  • 5
    Terrible Packaging
Pros
  • 75
    Schemas defined by the requests made by the user
  • 63
    Will replace RESTful interfaces
  • 62
    The future of API's
  • 49
    The future of databases
  • 12
    Self-documenting
Cons
  • 4
    More code to type.
  • 4
    Hard to migrate from GraphQL to another technology
  • 2
    Takes longer to build compared to schemaless.
  • 1
    No support for caching
  • 1
    No built in security

What are some alternatives to Kafka, GraphQL?

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Prisma

Prisma

Prisma is an open-source database toolkit. It replaces traditional ORMs and makes database access easy with an auto-generated query builder for TypeScript & Node.js.

PostGraphile

PostGraphile

Execute one command (or mount one Node.js middleware) and get an instant high-performance GraphQL API for your PostgreSQL database

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase