HAML vs Handlebars.js

Overview

Handlebars.js

Stacks8.3K

Followers3.2K

Votes308

HAML

Stacks600

Followers331

Votes267

GitHub Stars3.8K

Forks580

HAML vs Handlebars.js: What are the differences?

Syntax: HAML uses indentation-based syntax while Handlebars.js uses curly braces and double brackets for templating.
Conditional Statements: HAML supports conditional statements like if/else whereas Handlebars.js primarily focuses on looping through data.
Interpolation: Handlebars.js supports data interpolation using {{ }} whereas HAML uses a combination of !{} and - to output data dynamically.
Helper Functions: Handlebars.js allows the creation and usage of custom helper functions to manipulate data whereas HAML doesn't have a built-in mechanism for this.
Whitespace Control: HAML has significant whitespace control for clean and readable code output whereas Handlebars.js is less strict in this aspect.
Data Binding: Handlebars.js implements a two-way data binding mechanism for synchronizing data between the view and model, a feature not found in HAML.

In Summary, HAML and Handlebars.js differ in syntax, conditional statements, interpolation methods, handling of helper functions, whitespace control, and data binding approaches.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Handlebars.js, HAML

Asad

Software Engineer at Lisec Automation

Jun 15, 2020

Needs adviceon

.NET

Handlebars.js

@All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.

Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?

Thanks In Advance

240k views240k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Handlebars.js	HAML
Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.	Haml is a markup language that’s used to cleanly and simply describe the HTML of any web document, without the use of inline code. Haml functions as a replacement for inline page templating systems such as PHP, ERB, and ASP. However, Haml avoids the need for explicitly coding HTML into the template, because it is actually an abstract description of the HTML, with some code to generate dynamic content.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 3.8K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 580
Stacks 8.3K	Stacks 600
Followers 3.2K	Followers 331
Votes 308	Votes 267
Pros & Cons
Pros 106 Simple 76 Great templating language 50 Open source 36 Logicless 20 Integrates well into any codebase	Pros 68 Clean and simple 49 No html open/close tags 39 Easier to write than ERB 36 Forces clean and readable code 34 Simpler markup language Cons 3 It's not Pug
Integrations
Mustache	Rails

What are some alternatives to Handlebars.js, HAML?

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

HAML vs Handlebars.js: What are the differences?

Syntax: HAML uses indentation-based syntax while Handlebars.js uses curly braces and double brackets for templating.
Conditional Statements: HAML supports conditional statements like if/else whereas Handlebars.js primarily focuses on looping through data.
Interpolation: Handlebars.js supports data interpolation using {{ }} whereas HAML uses a combination of !{} and - to output data dynamically.
Helper Functions: Handlebars.js allows the creation and usage of custom helper functions to manipulate data whereas HAML doesn't have a built-in mechanism for this.
Whitespace Control: HAML has significant whitespace control for clean and readable code output whereas Handlebars.js is less strict in this aspect.
Data Binding: Handlebars.js implements a two-way data binding mechanism for synchronizing data between the view and model, a feature not found in HAML.

In Summary, HAML and Handlebars.js differ in syntax, conditional statements, interpolation methods, handling of helper functions, whitespace control, and data binding approaches.

HAML vs Handlebars.js

Overview