StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. Handlebars.js vs Material Design for Angular

Handlebars.js vs Material Design for Angular

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js
Stacks8.3K
Followers3.2K
Votes308
Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Stacks11.8K
Followers9.6K
Votes522
GitHub Stars16.5K
Forks3.4K

Handlebars.js vs Material Design for Angular: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Handlebars.js and Material Design for Angular

Handlebars.js and Material Design for Angular are two popular web development technologies that are used for different purposes. Handlebars.js is a lightweight JavaScript templating engine that helps in generating dynamic HTML content, while Material Design for Angular is a UI component library based on the Material Design principles created by Google.

  1. Syntax and Usage: Handlebars.js uses a simple and intuitive syntax for creating templates, which are then compiled into HTML. It allows for the insertion of variables, conditionals, and loops to generate dynamic content. On the other hand, Material Design for Angular provides a set of pre-built UI components that can be easily integrated into an Angular application using Angular directives.

  2. Flexibility and Customization: Handlebars.js provides more flexibility by allowing developers to create their own custom helpers and partial templates. This enables more control over the rendering process and customization of the templates. Material Design for Angular, on the other hand, offers a wide range of pre-designed UI components with options for customization, but the level of flexibility is limited compared to Handlebars.js.

  3. Data Binding: Handlebars.js uses data binding to automatically update the HTML content whenever the underlying data changes. It allows for one-way and two-way data binding, where changes in the model are reflected in the view and vice versa. Material Design for Angular also supports data binding, but it is mainly focused on one-way data binding, where changes in the model are propagated to the view.

  4. Rich UI Components: Material Design for Angular provides a comprehensive set of UI components, including buttons, cards, menus, dialogs, and more. These components follow the Material Design guidelines and offer a consistent and visually appealing user interface. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, does not provide any built-in UI components and is primarily focused on generating dynamic HTML content based on templates.

  5. Integration with Angular: Material Design for Angular is specifically designed for use with the Angular framework. It seamlessly integrates with Angular's syntax and features, making it easier for developers to build Angular applications with Material Design. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, is framework-agnostic and can be used with any JavaScript framework or even standalone.

  6. Community and Resources: Handlebars.js has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and libraries available. It is a widely adopted templating engine with support from various web development tools and frameworks. Material Design for Angular also has a strong and growing community, but the available resources may be relatively limited compared to Handlebars.js.

In summary, Handlebars.js is a lightweight templating engine that focuses on generating dynamic HTML content, while Material Design for Angular is a UI component library based on the Material Design principles. Handlebars.js provides more flexibility and customization options, while Material Design for Angular offers a rich set of pre-designed UI components and seamless integration with the Angular framework.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Handlebars.js, Material Design for Angular

Asad
Asad

Software Engineer at Lisec Automation

Jun 15, 2020

Needs adviceon.NET.NETHandlebars.jsHandlebars.js

@All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.

Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?

Thanks In Advance

240k views240k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js
Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
16.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.4K
Stacks
8.3K
Stacks
11.8K
Followers
3.2K
Followers
9.6K
Votes
308
Votes
522
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 106
    Simple
  • 76
    Great templating language
  • 50
    Open source
  • 36
    Logicless
  • 20
    Integrates well into any codebase
Pros
  • 122
    Ui components
  • 63
    Backed by google
  • 51
    Free
  • 51
    Backed by angular
  • 47
    Javascript
Cons
  • 4
    No practical examples
Integrations
Mustache
Mustache
AngularJS
AngularJS

What are some alternatives to Handlebars.js, Material Design for Angular?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase