StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. Handlebars.js vs React Storybook

Handlebars.js vs React Storybook

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js
Stacks8.3K
Followers3.2K
Votes308
React Storybook
React Storybook
Stacks635
Followers355
Votes0

Handlebars.js vs React Storybook: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Handlebars.js and React Storybook. Both Handlebars.js and React Storybook are popular tools used in web development, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features.

  1. Template Rendering: Handlebars.js is primarily a templating engine that allows developers to generate HTML markup by combining templates with data. It provides a way to separate the presentation layer from the logic by using placeholders and helpers. On the other hand, React Storybook is a UI development environment that allows developers to build, test, and showcase UI components in isolation. It focuses on code organization and component reusability rather than generating HTML markup.

  2. JavaScript vs. React: Handlebars.js uses JavaScript as its templating language, allowing developers to write dynamic logic directly within the templates. It provides conditional statements, loops, and other JavaScript constructs to handle data manipulation and rendering. In contrast, React Storybook uses React, a JavaScript library for building user interfaces. React follows a component-based approach where UI elements are treated as reusable and independent units, making it easier to develop complex UIs.

  3. Live Interaction: Handlebars.js generates static HTML on the server-side, meaning that the template is rendered only once with the available data. Any subsequent changes to the data require a page reload. On the other hand, React Storybook allows for live interaction and real-time updates in the browser. Developers can modify the component state or props, and the changes are reflected instantly without reloading the page.

  4. Component Library: Handlebars.js does not have a built-in component library. Developers need to manually create and manage reusable UI components if needed. React Storybook, on the other hand, provides a dedicated environment for building and organizing UI components. It allows developers to create a centralized component library that can be shared across different projects, promoting reusability and consistency.

  5. Developer Experience: Handlebars.js focuses on simplicity and ease of use, providing a straightforward syntax for templating. It does not require any additional build tools or setup, making it accessible to developers of different skill levels. React Storybook, on the other hand, requires setting up a development environment with dependencies such as Node.js and bundling tools like webpack. It offers a more comprehensive development experience with hot module reloading, automatic testing, and other advanced features.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Handlebars.js has been around for a longer time and has a large community of users and contributors. It has a rich ecosystem of plugins and extensions, offering additional functionalities like internationalization and data manipulation. React Storybook, although relatively newer, is gaining popularity rapidly and has an active community. It has its own ecosystem of addons and tools specifically designed for building UI components.

In summary, Handlebars.js is primarily a templating engine focused on generating HTML markup with JavaScript logic, while React Storybook is a development environment for building and showcasing UI components using React. Handlebars.js provides simplicity and easy integration, while React Storybook offers a more comprehensive development experience and promotes component reusability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Handlebars.js, React Storybook

Asad
Asad

Software Engineer at Lisec Automation

Jun 15, 2020

Needs adviceon.NET.NETHandlebars.jsHandlebars.js

@All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.

Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?

Thanks In Advance

240k views240k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js
React Storybook
React Storybook

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

You just load your UI components into the React Storybook and start developing them. This functionality allows you to develop UI components rapidly without worrying about the app. It will improve your team’s collaboration and feedback loop.

-
Isolated environment for your components (with the use of various iframe tactics);Hot module reloading (even for functional stateless components);Works with any app (whether it's Redux, Relay or Meteor);Support for CSS (whether it's plain old CSS, CSS modules or something fancy);Clean and fast user interface;Runs inside your project (so, it uses your app's NPM modules and babel configurations out of the box);Serves static files (if you host static files inside your app);Deploy the whole storybook as a static app;Extendable as necessary (support for custom webpack loaders and plugins)
Statistics
Stacks
8.3K
Stacks
635
Followers
3.2K
Followers
355
Votes
308
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 106
    Simple
  • 76
    Great templating language
  • 50
    Open source
  • 36
    Logicless
  • 20
    Integrates well into any codebase
Cons
  • 5
    Hard dependency to Babel loader
Integrations
Mustache
Mustache
React
React
React Native
React Native
Vue.js
Vue.js

What are some alternatives to Handlebars.js, React Storybook?

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Mustache

Mustache

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

Slim Lang

Slim Lang

Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.

RactiveJS

RactiveJS

Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

EJS

EJS

It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.

PrimeNg

PrimeNg

It has a rich collection of components that would satisfy most of the UI requirements of your application like datatable, dropdown, multiselect, notification messages, accordion, breadcrumbs and other input components. So there would be no need of adding different libraries for different UI requirements.

Structor

Structor

Structor is a visual development environment for node.js Web applications with React UI. The essential part of the builder is a project boilerplate. The boilerplate is a prepacked source code of node.js application in which metainfo included.

Jinja

Jinja

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.

Twig

Twig

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase