StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. Haxe vs MonoGame

Haxe vs MonoGame

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Haxe
Haxe
Stacks151
Followers59
Votes0
GitHub Stars6.6K
Forks688
MonoGame
MonoGame
Stacks33
Followers52
Votes1

Haxe vs MonoGame: What are the differences?

  1. Language Compatibility: Haxe is a multi-platform language that can target various platforms such as JavaScript, C++, Python, and more, while MonoGame is primarily focused on C# and targets platforms supported by the .NET framework.

  2. Development Environment: Haxe provides a complete development environment with its own compiler and tools, whereas MonoGame relies on the Visual Studio IDE for development, which may require additional setup and configuration.

  3. Community and Support: Haxe has a smaller but active community that offers support through forums and documentation, while MonoGame has a larger community and extensive documentation due to its connection with the XNA framework.

  4. Architecture Design: Haxe follows a more flexible architecture design that allows developers to create modular and reusable code, whereas MonoGame follows a more structured architecture that simplifies game development but may limit flexibility in certain cases.

  5. Platform Support: Haxe provides broader platform support for mobile (iOS, Android), web, desktop, and more, while MonoGame primarily targets desktop platforms such as Windows, macOS, and Linux with limited support for mobile and consoles.

  6. Performance Optimization: Haxe offers more optimization options for performance tuning through its compiler settings and targets various platforms efficiently, whereas MonoGame provides optimizations through code-level performance tweaks specific to the .NET framework.

In Summary, Haxe and MonoGame differ in language compatibility, development environments, community support, architecture design, platform support, and performance optimization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Haxe
Haxe
MonoGame
MonoGame

It is an open source toolkit based on a modern, high level, strictly typed programming language, a cross-compiler, a complete cross-platform standard library and ways to access each platform's native capabilities.

It is a free C# framework used by game developers to make games for multiple platforms and other systems. It is also used to make Windows and Windows Phone games run on other systems.

Extension methods; Functional programming; Ability to target alternate platforms such as C#.NET; Ability to target devices that support only C++
Cross-Platform; Open-Source; Managed Code
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
688
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
151
Stacks
33
Followers
59
Followers
52
Votes
0
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 0
    [object Object]
Pros
  • 1
    Cross-platform
Cons
  • 1
    No GUI
  • 1
    Can't working in vs mac 2019
Integrations
C++
C++
HTML5
HTML5
Python
Python
Node.js
Node.js
C#
C#
C#
C#
Linux
Linux
Windows
Windows
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to Haxe, MonoGame?

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Unity

Unity

Unity is the ultimate game development platform. Use Unity to build high-quality 3D and 2D games, deploy them across mobile, desktop, VR/AR, consoles or the Web, and connect with loyal and enthusiastic players and customers.

Mustache

Mustache

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

Slim Lang

Slim Lang

Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.

Godot

Godot

It is an advanced, feature-packed, multi-platform 2D and 3D open source game engine. It is developed by hundreds of contributors from all around the world.

Unreal Engine

Unreal Engine

It is a game engine that helps you make games. It is made up of several components that work together to drive the game. Its massive system of tools and editors allows you to organize your assets and manipulate them to create the gameplay for your game.

Gamemaker Studio 2

Gamemaker Studio 2

It has everything you need to take your idea from concept to finished game. With no barriers to entry and powerful functionality.

RactiveJS

RactiveJS

Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase