Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Hexo

351
384
+ 1
70
MkDocs

121
149
+ 1
14
Add tool

Hexo vs MkDocs: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Hexo and MkDocs

  1. Static Site Generator: Hexo is a static site generator written in Node.js, whereas MkDocs is a static site generator built with Python. While both tools serve the purpose of generating static websites, the underlying programming language can be a deciding factor based on the developer's familiarity and preferences.

  2. Documentation Generation: MkDocs is primarily designed for creating project documentation with a focus on simplicity and ease of use. On the other hand, Hexo is more versatile and can be used for creating a wide range of websites beyond just documentation. Depending on the specific requirements of the project, the choice between MkDocs and Hexo can be influenced by the focus on documentation versus general website generation.

  3. Theming and Customization: Hexo provides a wide array of themes and plugins for customizing the appearance and functionality of the generated website. In contrast, MkDocs offers a simpler theming system with limited customization options compared to Hexo. If extensive theming and customization are essential for the project, developers may lean towards Hexo for its flexibility.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Hexo has a larger and more active community compared to MkDocs, resulting in a broader range of plugins, themes, and community support. This can be advantageous when seeking help, troubleshooting issues, or finding resources to enhance the functionality of the static site generator. Developers who prioritize community support and a rich ecosystem may opt for Hexo over MkDocs.

  5. Development Speed and Performance: MkDocs is known for its rapid setup and straightforward workflow, making it a suitable choice for quick documentation projects. Hexo, with its Node.js foundation, offers efficient performance and speed during the development and generation process. Depending on the project's emphasis on development speed or runtime performance, developers can choose between MkDocs and Hexo accordingly.

  6. Markdown Support: Both Hexo and MkDocs rely on Markdown for content creation, but they may have differences in Markdown extensions and rendering capabilities. Developers should consider the Markdown features required for their project, such as support for tables, syntax highlighting, or mathematical expressions, to determine which static site generator aligns better with their needs.

In Summary, the key differences between Hexo and MkDocs lie in their programming language, focus on documentation, theming flexibility, community support, development speed, and Markdown support.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Hexo
Pros of MkDocs
  • 18
    Ease of deployment
  • 13
    Uses NodeJS and npm
  • 12
    Easy GitHub Pages publishing
  • 10
    Powerful templating
  • 7
    Useful tools and plugins
  • 4
    Easy intergrating with js
  • 3
    Open source
  • 3
    Blazing Fast
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Gitlab integration
  • 3
    Extensibility
  • 2
    Themes

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Hexo
Cons of MkDocs
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 1
      Build time increases exponentially as site grows

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Hexo?

    Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

    What is MkDocs?

    It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Hexo?
    What companies use MkDocs?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Hexo or MkDocs.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Hexo?
    What tools integrate with MkDocs?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Hexo and MkDocs?
    Jekyll
    Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.
    Ghost
    Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.
    Hugo
    Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.
    Apache Aurora
    Apache Aurora is a service scheduler that runs on top of Mesos, enabling you to run long-running services that take advantage of Mesos' scalability, fault-tolerance, and resource isolation.
    WordPress
    The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.
    See all alternatives