Hound vs PMD

Overview

Hound

Stacks41

Followers47

Votes14

PMD

Stacks46

Followers111

Votes0

GitHub Stars5.2K

Forks1.5K

Hound vs PMD: What are the differences?

# Introduction
When it comes to code analysis tools, Hound and PMD are popular choices among developers. Both tools offer valuable features to help ensure code quality and maintainability. However, there are key differences between Hound and PMD that are important to consider.

1. **Language Support**: One of the significant differences between Hound and PMD is the range of programming languages they support. Hound primarily focuses on Ruby, while PMD supports a broader range of languages such as Java, XML, and JavaScript.
   
2. **Integration with IDEs**: PMD provides seamless integration with popular Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) like Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA, making it easier for developers to incorporate code analysis into their workflow. On the other hand, Hound does not offer the same level of IDE integration.
   
3. **Rule Customization**: Hound is known for its simplicity and predefined set of rules, which can limit the ability to customize rules according to specific project requirements. In contrast, PMD allows users to define custom rules, making it more flexible for different use cases.
   
4. **Community Support**: PMD has a larger and more active community compared to Hound, providing a wealth of resources, plugins, and support for users. This community-driven ecosystem can be beneficial for developers looking to enhance their code analysis process.
   
5. **Static Analysis Capabilities**: While both Hound and PMD perform static code analysis, PMD offers more advanced features such as data flow analysis and metrics calculations. These capabilities can provide deeper insights into code quality and potential issues.
   
6. **Ease of Setup**: Hound is designed to be quick and easy to set up, with minimal configuration required to start analyzing code. In comparison, PMD may have a steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set and customization options.

In Summary, Key differences between Hound and PMD offer insight into language support, IDE integration, rule customization, community support, static analysis capabilities, and ease of setup.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Hound	PMD
Automated code review for GitHub pull requests. It comments on code quality and style issues, allowing you and your team to better review and maintain a clean codebase.	It is a source code analyzer. It finds common programming flaws like unused variables, empty catch blocks, unnecessary object creation, and so forth. It includes CPD, the copy-paste-detector.
Open source; Free for public repos; Automated reviews of GitHub pull requests;GitHub App	supports multiple languages; enforce a coding standard for your codebase; built-in checks
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 5.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.5K
Stacks 41	Stacks 46
Followers 47	Followers 111
Votes 14	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Comments on style so I don't have to 3 Easy configuration 3 Fast 2 Free for OSS 2 Inline comments	No community feedback yet
Integrations
ESLint GitHub SwiftLint RuboCop Credo	Gradle Windows Java Linux macOS

What are some alternatives to Hound, PMD?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

Hound vs PMD: What are the differences?

# Introduction
When it comes to code analysis tools, Hound and PMD are popular choices among developers. Both tools offer valuable features to help ensure code quality and maintainability. However, there are key differences between Hound and PMD that are important to consider.

1. **Language Support**: One of the significant differences between Hound and PMD is the range of programming languages they support. Hound primarily focuses on Ruby, while PMD supports a broader range of languages such as Java, XML, and JavaScript.
   
2. **Integration with IDEs**: PMD provides seamless integration with popular Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) like Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA, making it easier for developers to incorporate code analysis into their workflow. On the other hand, Hound does not offer the same level of IDE integration.
   
3. **Rule Customization**: Hound is known for its simplicity and predefined set of rules, which can limit the ability to customize rules according to specific project requirements. In contrast, PMD allows users to define custom rules, making it more flexible for different use cases.
   
4. **Community Support**: PMD has a larger and more active community compared to Hound, providing a wealth of resources, plugins, and support for users. This community-driven ecosystem can be beneficial for developers looking to enhance their code analysis process.
   
5. **Static Analysis Capabilities**: While both Hound and PMD perform static code analysis, PMD offers more advanced features such as data flow analysis and metrics calculations. These capabilities can provide deeper insights into code quality and potential issues.
   
6. **Ease of Setup**: Hound is designed to be quick and easy to set up, with minimal configuration required to start analyzing code. In comparison, PMD may have a steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set and customization options.

In Summary, Key differences between Hound and PMD offer insight into language support, IDE integration, rule customization, community support, static analysis capabilities, and ease of setup.

Hound vs PMD

Overview