Hound vs Quantifiedcode: What are the differences?
Hound: A hosted service that comments on Ruby style guide violations in your GitHub pull requests. Take care of pesky code reviews with a trusty Hound. Hound reviews GitHub pull requests for style guide violations; Quantifiedcode: The first platform for automated code review AND repair. QuantifiedCode is an automated, data-driven code review for Python. Our goal is to help developers write better software in less time. Therefore, we make state-of-the-art code analysis available to everyone.
Hound and Quantifiedcode can be primarily classified as "Code Review" tools.
"Comments on style so I don't have to" is the primary reason why developers consider Hound over the competitors, whereas "Github integration" was stated as the key factor in picking Quantifiedcode.
Hound is an open source tool with 1.72K GitHub stars and 393 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Hound's open source repository on GitHub.
What is Hound?
What is Quantifiedcode?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Hound?
What are the cons of using Quantifiedcode?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
There are few things in python you do not learn till it punches you in the face. Mutable data types. I started using python 6 months back and "assumed" arguments are passed by value. One example where this mutable argument can behave in a way that you do not expect it to be is if you have lets say "" as a default argument of function. Example:
def myfunc( input= ) blah blah
This does something bad and Quantified Code detects this. They point out that this is not what you expect. They suggest better ways to achieve the same. This is good stuff.
One piece of advise is to not to try fix everything that QC suggests. Fix the dangerous ones. Do not become a victim if instantaneous gratification QC provides.