Hound vs SwiftLint

Overview

Hound

Stacks41

Followers47

Votes14

SwiftLint

Stacks156

Followers105

Votes0

GitHub Stars19.3K

Forks2.3K

Hound vs SwiftLint: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

License: Hound is open-source and free to use, while SwiftLint requires a license fee for commercial use.
Language Support: Hound supports multiple programming languages such as Ruby, Go, and JavaScript, while SwiftLint is specifically designed for Swift programming language.
Configuration Options: Hound offers limited configuration options compared to the extensive customization options available in SwiftLint.
Integration: Hound can be seamlessly integrated with GitHub repositories for automated code review, whereas SwiftLint requires additional setup for integration with version control systems.
Rule Set: Hound has a predefined set of rules for code styling and formatting, whereas SwiftLint allows users to define custom rules based on their specific requirements.
Community Support: SwiftLint benefits from a larger community of Swift developers contributing to its development and enhancement, while Hound may have a smaller user base and community support.

In Summary, Hound and SwiftLint have key differences in terms of licensing, language support, configuration options, integration, rule set, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Hound	SwiftLint
Automated code review for GitHub pull requests. It comments on code quality and style issues, allowing you and your team to better review and maintain a clean codebase.	It is a tool to enforce Swift style and conventions, loosely based on GitHub's Swift Style Guide.It hooks into Clang and SourceKit to use the AST representation of your source files for more accurate results.
Open source; Free for public repos; Automated reviews of GitHub pull requests;GitHub App	automatically correct certain violations; supports nesting configuration files
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 19.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.3K
Stacks 41	Stacks 156
Followers 47	Followers 105
Votes 14	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Comments on style so I don't have to 3 Easy configuration 3 Fast 2 Free for OSS 2 Inline comments	No community feedback yet
Integrations
ESLint GitHub RuboCop Credo	Xcode Jenkins macOS

What are some alternatives to Hound, SwiftLint?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

Hound vs SwiftLint: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

License: Hound is open-source and free to use, while SwiftLint requires a license fee for commercial use.
Language Support: Hound supports multiple programming languages such as Ruby, Go, and JavaScript, while SwiftLint is specifically designed for Swift programming language.
Configuration Options: Hound offers limited configuration options compared to the extensive customization options available in SwiftLint.
Integration: Hound can be seamlessly integrated with GitHub repositories for automated code review, whereas SwiftLint requires additional setup for integration with version control systems.
Rule Set: Hound has a predefined set of rules for code styling and formatting, whereas SwiftLint allows users to define custom rules based on their specific requirements.
Community Support: SwiftLint benefits from a larger community of Swift developers contributing to its development and enhancement, while Hound may have a smaller user base and community support.

In Summary, Hound and SwiftLint have key differences in terms of licensing, language support, configuration options, integration, rule set, and community support.

Hound vs SwiftLint

Overview