Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Add tool
Hound vs SwiftLint: What are the differences?
<Write Introduction here>
- License: Hound is open-source and free to use, while SwiftLint requires a license fee for commercial use.
- Language Support: Hound supports multiple programming languages such as Ruby, Go, and JavaScript, while SwiftLint is specifically designed for Swift programming language.
- Configuration Options: Hound offers limited configuration options compared to the extensive customization options available in SwiftLint.
- Integration: Hound can be seamlessly integrated with GitHub repositories for automated code review, whereas SwiftLint requires additional setup for integration with version control systems.
- Rule Set: Hound has a predefined set of rules for code styling and formatting, whereas SwiftLint allows users to define custom rules based on their specific requirements.
- Community Support: SwiftLint benefits from a larger community of Swift developers contributing to its development and enhancement, while Hound may have a smaller user base and community support.
In Summary, Hound and SwiftLint have key differences in terms of licensing, language support, configuration options, integration, rule set, and community support.
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn MorePros of Hound
Pros of SwiftLint
Pros of Hound
- Comments on style so I don't have to4
- Easy configuration3
- Fast3
- Free for OSS2
- Inline comments2
Pros of SwiftLint
Be the first to leave a pro
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
- No public GitHub repository available -
What is Hound?
Automated code review for GitHub pull requests. It comments on code quality and style issues, allowing you and your team to better review and maintain a clean codebase.
What is SwiftLint?
It is a tool to enforce Swift style and conventions, loosely based on GitHub's Swift Style Guide.It hooks into Clang and SourceKit to use the AST representation of your source files for more accurate results.
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Hound?
What companies use SwiftLint?
What companies use Hound?
See which teams inside your own company are using Hound or SwiftLint.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn MoreSign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Hound?
What tools integrate with SwiftLint?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+43 18
5236
What are some alternatives to Hound and SwiftLint?
ESLint
A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.
Prettier
Prettier is an opinionated code formatter. It enforces a consistent style by parsing your code and re-printing it with its own rules that take the maximum line length into account, wrapping code when necessary.
TSLint
An extensible static analysis tool that checks TypeScript code for readability, maintainability, and functionality errors. It is widely supported across modern editors & build systems and can be customized with your own lint rules, configurations, and formatters.
SonarQube
SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.
RuboCop
RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.